Posted on 08/23/2002 7:23:27 PM PDT by rdb3
|
One would think that PR would make MS consider its tactics. Only time will tell.
Want on or off? Just holla!
Family Pack Software License Agreement allows you to install and use one copy of the Apple Software on up to a maximum of five (5) Apple-labeled computers at a time as long as those computers are located in the same household and used by persons who occupy that same household. By "household" we mean a person or persons sharing the same housing unit such as a home, apartment, mobile home or condominium. This license does not extend to students who reside at a separate on-campus location or to business or commercial users.
Today things are not the same as they were for the Ford monopoly of the auto industry of 1915. Monopolys can not exist with out governments to enforce them. When the monopoly starts to mistreat customers, as they always do, the customers go to someone else. Only if Gates is able to use the government to enforce his monopoly can he hold his place. What the world needs is a Windows clone. A UNIX clone will not do it. The Chevie defeated Ford, because if you could drive a Ford, you could drive a Chevie. If the Ford ran on road, the Chevie would run on the same road. But being able to run Windows dosen't mean you can run LINUX. And a network highway that runs windows has to dance the Samba well to work with LINUX. Most guys can't dance well at all.
Windows in not uncloneable. But to defeat Gates some one or group will have to do it. UNIX is a much more complete and complex operating system than Windows. Linus Torvalds, when he was a just a college student, cloned the UNIX kernel. He called it LINUX. He did it while he was a full time student in college.
Windows could be cloned more easily than UNIX. The problem of taking down Gates, is the people are trying to do it with a UNIX clone. A UNIX clone will take down Sun Microsystems UNIX but it will not take down Bill Gates' Windows. It will take a windows clone to do that.
When someone clones windows and sells it at a lower price and in addition operates his business with a more customer friendly attitude, Gates monopoly will be history.
If that is the model, then Microsoft is in fine shape. Consumers like their software. They want their software. Microsoft is, in most consumer's mind, required on their computers. I love Linux but I don't see it taking over in the consumer/business market until there is some "killer app" that it offers and which Microsoft cant or wont offer. Then consumers may demand it. It's time the Linux community started shifting focus from OS stability and performance to ingenious applications (not just emulators of windows apps and scientifinc stuff but rather something that you just dont see in Windows, preferrably something that Windows cannot easily do).
For many years, Microsoft turned a blind eye to unauthorized copying, and their market share (both official and unofficial) grew. They waited and waited, until they had successfully driven all their competition out of the market, and now they seek to collect from all the suckers that fell victim to Windows dominance.
I can't say I blame them. I blame the suckers who couldn't see that alternatives were needed, and that a competitive market is best, instead greedily grabbing their "warez" just to play some stupid game.
Piffle.
For one, most people don't care what OS they use. They want access to their data they way they always have access to it.
They want to use their email, browse the web, write documents, put data into spreadsheets and databases, and share files over the network.
Linux with KDE or Gnome already provides mail clients, browsers, word processors, spreadsheets, databases and NFS, CIFS/Samba, Novell and Mac network access. KDE with the Redmond 95 theme is almost indistinguishable from Windows. For the hard core power Word or Excel users, those applications can be run today using Wine.
To use your analogy, a user with a Linux desktop outfitted with Wine, MS Office, Evolution and Mozilla can access all of the same data that a user can access using Windows. That is, they can drive their data down the same roads.
Most of the comparible Linux apps use the same controls as their Windows counterparts. Evolutions is eerily like Outlook. There is a theme for Mozilla that makes it so much like IE that only viewing the Help function lets you know that it's not IE. Except for the crashes, of course.
Secondly, a company attempting to clone Windows would be met with a massive PR/Legal attack from Microsoft, quickly burying the company under the onslaught.
Look at what happened to Lindows, and it isn't even a Windows clone. If the maker of Lindows didn't have money to burn from his sale of MP3.com, it would have been still-born.
There is little doubt, except among the hard-core "nothing-but-Microsoft" shills, that Linux is technically superior to Windows. But for Linux to succeed, that's not enough.
The key for any company to succeed with a desktop OS is to keep Microsoft from using it's monopoly power to force OEMs to load Windows on every desktop.
Microsoft knows this, that's why they've been trying so hard to do just that. I thought that the article that started this thread pointed that out quite well.
I bet you are.
Have you tried Jaguar?
Zoom zoom zoom.
That logic is absurd and idiotic. It's the same as saying :DEMOCRAP is being taken down by a DEMOCRAP clone named REPUBLICRAT. So liberals will have to be taken down with a liberal clone.
Sheer idiocy, you defeat a bad idea with a BETTER idea and a bad product is replaced by a BETTER product.
Wrong. I'm reading this on a Red Hat 7.3 KDE system using Mozilla, instead of my Win98 system with IE 5.5. Why? KDE is more than sufficient for my purposes, and it doesn't come with Microsoft's obnoxious, noxious and fundamentally dishonest policies as noted in this article.
There are a few Win-based apps I still use, and I'm slowly moving them over to run under Wine. For me, RH7.3 crossed the threshold of preference.
I don't need, or want, a "clone" of Windoze. I do need, and want, similar functionality. Just as some friends prefer Macs to WinPCs, I'm finding I am beginning to prefer LinPCs to WinPCs.
And Microsoft has only itself to thank for this.
Eala: a Linux user in Redmond, WA.
You mean like when Gates Cloned CP/M and called it MS-DOS. Or like when he Cloned OS/2 and called it Windows. Or like when he Cloned Netscape and called it IE. Or..... Well you get the point.
Try OSX. It's much better than desktop Linux. Chimera (COCOA browser based on Mozilla rendering engine) owns regular Mozilla. It is so much faster on my G3 desktop (Blue and White G3 350 soon to be G4500). BeOS aside, there is no geekier OS than OSX. It might as well be called NeXTSTEP 5.1.5/5.2
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.