Posted on 08/20/2002 1:14:00 PM PDT by JohnathanRGalt
This week we're featuring images and movies from www.qassam.net, in honor of the ISP's attempt to block us from accessing the site. Today's 'episode' is The Road Bomb. It goes like this: first they bury a bomb in a road. Then they retreat to a nearby hillside with a video camera. When an Israel truck drives over the bomb, they blow it to pieces, killing the occupants, and capturing the whole thing on tape. The tape is broadcase on Arab television, and then is uploaded to their webside, so they can share it with the rest of the world. Qassam is the military wing of Hamas. They are the people who killed 5 Americans when they set off a bomb at the cafeteria at Hebrew University in Jerusalem. Their website is served up from Houston, Texas. The movie is 1.4MB, and will open in a new window. Click the still image (above) to view the movie. Then say a prayer for the dead...
A fair number of the sites we've identified have wound up being hosted by BurstNET (aka Network Operations Center, Inc.) or Everyone's Internet. Both these companies claim to be hosting these sites because the US government is forcing them to do so . We have no way of verifying that claim.
These are the brochure sites of terrorist organizations. Their purpose is to incite, to inflame, to encourage people to either join the organization or to go off and commit some act of violence on their own. The modern terrorist organization doesn't care about publicity. They simply want to kill. I don't think it makes a damn bit of difference to them who, if anyone, claims credit. At this point, the line between a hate crime and a terrorist act becomes blurred. The attack on the El Al counter at LAX is a good example of what I'm talking about . I'm beginning to think that the people we need to write letters to are not the ISPs, but our Representatives and Senators. I don't think the intelligence gathered by watching people access these sites is worth the lives lost when one such visitor goes on a killing spree.
The US law that seems to apply to these sites seems to be interpreted pretty narrowly by Federal law enforcement. They see 'material support or resources' as meaning money -- fundraising activity. I interpret it more generally, and see these sites as a resource, as part of the communications infrastructure of an enemy force, i.e. a legitimate target. It would be worthwhile to see what the intent of the Congress was when they passed the Patriot Act of 2002. I suspect their view was more like mine than not.
Whether these sites remain up because the authorities want them to, or because they are 'too busy' dealing with other matters, the way forward for us seems to be the same: to make a political issue out of it. The constant incitement to commit acts of violence against Jews and Americans must end.
No, not even blatent fundraising by Qassam will induce the authorities to take action. By the way, their fundraising link is still up on the Martyrs Brigade site five months after it was reported to the FBI.
Could it be that they are forcing the ISPs to host the sites because they enjoy watching videos of Jews getting killed.?
I've never bought this explanation for the authorities not taking down some of the more virulent sites. I suppose one could make a First Amendment arguement here but that's pretty thin under the circumstances. I don't think we'd have allowed a German SS site to operate during WWII even if we thought we could glean some info from it.
Bad analogy I think, at least prior to 07 December 1941 while we still maintained diplomatic relations with Germany. I believe a better comparison is with the producers and distributors of snuff films and videos, in which presumably unwilling actors are killed onscreen for entertainment purposes.
-archy-/-
This is true - we did not allow the Germans to do what the Islamists are now doing.
In 1938, the Foreign Agents Registration Act was Congress' response to the large number of German propaganda agents in the pre-WWII U.S. It's purpose was to insure that the American public and its law makers know the source of information (propaganda) intended to sway public opinion, policy, and laws. All of the owners of the Islamic terrorist websites should have been registered and the information must be made public.
FARA is one of those federal bureaucracies that were instituted and then someone forgot what the purpose was for - but still continues to exist on for decades sucking up millions of dollars without serving the original purpose. The only foreign agents that register are the ones who follow the law. I went to the FARA site and did a search for HAMAS -- the only agents returned were the BaHAMAS Tourist Council Agency.
Interesting site - thanks for the link.
At the very least, muslim fifth columnists in the US who raise money for islamist causes and terrorism and/or spread muslim supremacist lies and disinformation should be made to register!!!!
Incidently this isn't a first amendment issue. These sites are undoubtably violating the ISPs terms of service agreement. No privately owned business is ever compelled to publish material that it deems offensive.
The fact that these sites are still up is proof positive that the Federal gov't is requesting they remain up. The small fees paid to the ISPs would never make up for the amount of negative publicity that continuing to host these sites is generating.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.