Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Voter Harassment: Officials Try to Prohibit Woman Wearing Pro-life Shirt From Voting [Wayne County]
witness account

Posted on 08/07/2002 12:11:37 PM PDT by Notwithstanding

Yesterday a woman had to call her attorney in order to vote. Election officials in a Wayne County precinct refused to let the woman vote because she was wearing a pro-life t-shirt. After her attorney explained the law, she was allowed to vote. Meanwhile, the attorney also convinced the officials to require union poll watchers (who were sitting on polling place premises wearing candidate t-shirts and parking their cars with candidate stickers on site) to move to another are and park their cars offsite.

[NB: The law prohibits any form of campaigning for individual candidates or specific ballot measures, but does NOT prohibit other first amendment activity such as wearing things like union, environmental or pro-life t-shirts or buttons]


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 08/07/2002 12:11:37 PM PDT by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
Forgive my ignorance, but where is Wayne Co.? What state?
2 posted on 08/07/2002 12:14:24 PM PDT by Double Tap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Double Tap
MICHIGAN (Detroit and surrounding area)
3 posted on 08/07/2002 12:15:53 PM PDT by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
I'm just shocked... SHOCKED I tell you!

Did they have 110% registered voter turnout too?

4 posted on 08/07/2002 12:21:57 PM PDT by michigander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: michigander
Vote early, vote often, even after you are dead.
5 posted on 08/07/2002 12:23:30 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
I'll insert the obligatory and all-too-common comment...

"If the political roles were reversed, ABCNBCCBSCNNMSNBC would be all over this."

6 posted on 08/07/2002 12:28:03 PM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
Thanks for this account. Amazing but true. As in the Clinton years - the chief enemy of this country was not the Terrorists who want to kill us all - but prolifers who only want to save the lives of children!

Corrupt Criminal Union Thugs and others who tow the HillaryClintonLedDemonratic Party line....are more than willing to deny All our Constitutional RIGHTS if they can get away with it.

God bless this woman for having the courage to speak up for unborn babies despite the intimidation she received and God bless her attorney who was at the ready to stop this outrage! (Attorneys ARE GOOD GUYS when they take stands like this!)

7 posted on 08/07/2002 12:30:02 PM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: michigander
How much did Conyer's win by with such a high turnout?
8 posted on 08/07/2002 12:31:04 PM PDT by DrDavid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DrDavid
Votes

Candidate Name

Party

Votes - Detroit

Votes - Out-County

Total Votes - Wayne County

% of Total Votes Cast

CONYERS, JR., JOHN

DEM

61490

20863

82353

93.14%

STONE, DAVE

REP

752

5311

6063

6.85%


9 posted on 08/07/2002 12:41:34 PM PDT by michigander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
This lady should sue Wayne County but good. Any idiot knows that you can wear anything you want if all you are doing is voting! It's the First Amendment, stupid!!! You can even wear a candidate button, hat, t-shirt, etc. if you are just voting and leaving. I've done it in every election. The law only prohibits electioneering, i.e. standing around with a candidate's name on you or handing out partisan literature or putting up signs, within a certain distance of the polling place. Of course, even the latter is routinely violated by Democrats and their union thugs.
10 posted on 08/07/2002 12:41:51 PM PDT by Dems_R_Losers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
I had to run the gauntlet of at least 100 people from dem campaigns in the parking lot. It looked like a rally. You have to be at least 100 feet away from the polling center with your literature. No signs allowed but this place was a circus of signs, t shirts and kids chasing me. I had to RUN not walk, to get away from them.

Yes, this was in Wayne County.
11 posted on 08/07/2002 12:47:46 PM PDT by Hillary's Lovely Legs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: michigander
So it looks like while stuffing the boxes for Algore, they added a few for John "In doing my job as a Congressman, I lie all the time" Coyners too!

Thanks...

It looks like Stone got 6061 more votes than W did in Wayne County!

12 posted on 08/07/2002 12:53:12 PM PDT by DrDavid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
Sheesh. We may have to send Jimmy Carter there to observe elections like he does in Third World countries. On second thought . . .
13 posted on 08/07/2002 12:59:24 PM PDT by The Energizer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
Well well well. Wayne County. Why am I not surprised. I used to live in Ann Arbor, over in neighboring Washtenaw county, the nerve center for Communist thought in the US. Not surprised a bit...
14 posted on 08/07/2002 1:16:45 PM PDT by WyldKard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WyldKard
Why doesn't someone get the federal election people involved in this lawbreaking activity by the Rats.
15 posted on 08/07/2002 1:29:07 PM PDT by Pushi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Pushi
The question you should be asking is why didn't the Bush Justice Department have observers in all of the places they suspected voter fraud in the 2000 election. Or are they going to just let this fraud slide and get cheated again in 2004?
16 posted on 08/07/2002 1:42:01 PM PDT by CdMGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers
Of course, even the latter is routinely violated by Democrats and their union thugs

In our neighborhood the same goes for the Republicans...

17 posted on 08/07/2002 2:10:42 PM PDT by Eowyn-of-Rohan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

bttt
18 posted on 08/07/2002 2:26:16 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Sara Of Earth †
ping
19 posted on 08/07/2002 2:35:03 PM PDT by martian_22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson