Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran Would Answer U.S. Strikes in Minimum Time: Minister
Islam Online ^ | July 23 2002

Posted on 07/23/2002 10:18:35 AM PDT by knighthawk

TEHRAN, July 23 (IslamOnline & News Agencies) - Iran would repulse a U.S. military strike in a swift and powerful fashion, Defense Minister Rear Admiral Ali Shamkhani said in remarks published Tuesday, July 23, amid U.S. hostility towards the Islamic regime.

"Iran would answer in minimum time, reciprocally and in a powerful manner any military attack against its political, military, media and social bodies," Shamkhani was quoted saying by the Jam-e-Jam daily.

"Any fast and short term action by the United States against the Islamic republic will receive multiple and varied responses," he warned.

The Defense Minister cited a number of factors which he said added up to a growing threat to Iran from the United States.

The two are longtime foes who severed ties after the 1979 hostage-taking of the U.S. Embassy staff in Tehran, but their relations deteriorated further this year after U.S. President George W. Bush labeled Iran part of an "axis of evil" along with Iraq and North Korea.

On July 13, Bush was accused of brazen intervention by Iranians of all factions when he urged Tehran in a statement to abandon "uncompromising, destructive policies" and pledged that a reforming, modernizing Iran would have "no better friend" than the United States.

President Mohammad Khatami had earlier dismissed Bush’s offer of U.S. support for democratic changes in the Islamic republic.

“I want to assure you there are no differences in Iran on the idea of defending the territorial integrity of the country and safeguarding its independence,” Khatami said, urging U.S. leaders to “apologize to the people and government (of Iran).”

He called for U.S. leaders “to apologize to the people and government (of Iran) and thus breach the wall of mistrust which separates the two countries.”

Khatami said Iran was “determined to follow the path towards progress, freedom and independence without any consideration for threats.”

Meanwhile, Iran's elite Revolutionary Guards have accused reformists of being "pawns" in a possible U.S. plan to invade Iran, claims that enraged reformists on Monday, July 22, news agencies reported.

The guards, who are under the direct control of supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, have said reformists are "challenging values of the (1979 Islamic) revolution" and are "being pawns at the time of possible military invasion" of the United States against Iran.

Reformist lawmaker Rajabali Mazrouei on Monday reacted angrily to the guards' claims, which were made in a statement Saturday, July 20.

"Intervention of the guards in factional politics in favor of conservatives is illegal, irresponsible and harmful to the country's interests," Mazrouei told The Associated Press.

Mazrouei defended Iran's reformist movement, which despite the election of reformist President Mohammad Khatami has been stifled by conservative clerics who rule key state institutions, including the judiciary.

"We (reformists) oppose comments by foreign governments in support or opposition to any political faction in Iran. Foreign governments should not interfere in Iran's internal affairs," Mazrouei said.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iran; shamkhani; us
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Iran: Revolutionary Guards issue an unprecedented warning
1 posted on 07/23/2002 10:18:35 AM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; rebdov; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; keri; Turk2; ...
Ping
2 posted on 07/23/2002 10:19:12 AM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Yeah, they sure kicked Iraq's butt.
3 posted on 07/23/2002 10:20:06 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
We need to play chicken with this A-hole
4 posted on 07/23/2002 10:22:10 AM PDT by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
"Iran would answer in minimum time, reciprocally and in a powerful manner any military attack against its political, military, media and social bodies," Shamkhani was quoted saying by the Jam-e-Jam daily.

Couldn't say "we will fight back". Nope. Have to have some long winded sentence.

And what is "Jam-e-Jam"? A new rap DJ or Smuckers product?

5 posted on 07/23/2002 10:26:08 AM PDT by isthisnickcool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
"TEHRAN, July 23 (IslamOnline & News Agencies) - Iran would repulse a U.S. military strike in a swift and powerful fashion, Defense Minister Rear Admiral Ali Shamkhani said in remarks published Tuesday, July 23, amid U.S. hostility towards the Islamic regime."

With what? Camels?

6 posted on 07/23/2002 10:26:14 AM PDT by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
Yeah, they sure kicked Iraq's butt.

Yeah, and it only cost them 1 million people and 10 years to do it

7 posted on 07/23/2002 10:26:22 AM PDT by marvlus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
My bet is that they've already moved several disassembled nukes across the border from Mexico and have them stored in rental storage units, ready to be put together and detonated. Targets are probably pretty isolated, the object is not to kill a lot of people, merely to demonstrate that they can. Other bad guys moving dangerous stuff from Mexico with ease, may not share the Iranian objective.

So long as the border is so porous that 800,000 people and 200,000 tons of drugs can cross it each year without the ability of the US GOVERNMENT (Meixco could stop this traffic but then the Mexican politicians and drug lords, assuming they are different people, would take a financial hit) to stop it, bad guys and their property can cross, as well. Homeland security must start by securing the homeland.

8 posted on 07/23/2002 10:34:17 AM PDT by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Shakin in my Jam-e-Jams.
9 posted on 07/23/2002 10:34:56 AM PDT by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
And what happens when you poke a stick into the lion's cage? (especially when the cage is open)
10 posted on 07/23/2002 10:38:03 AM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
"Any fast and short term action by the United States against the Islamic republic will receive multiple and varied responses," he warned.

So make it fast and LONG-term.

11 posted on 07/23/2002 10:39:02 AM PDT by steveegg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
Cage? What cage? More like poking a stick into a lion's den, and it's just about feeding time.
12 posted on 07/23/2002 10:40:01 AM PDT by steveegg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
"Any fast and short term action by the United States against the Islamic republic will receive multiple and varied responses," he warned.

BAHAHAHA! Here, let me guess a couple of their varied responses:

1. "Holy SH*T!!!"

2. "Mercy! Mercy!"

3. Fire 3 SA missles, all of which miss and fall on some outlying camp of Bedouins (sp), and blame Israel.

4. Burn one pathetic effigy of Bush wrapped in an American flag (damn they like burning effigies, no?), then all go back to their bombshelters when the CNN reporter tells the cameraman, "Ok, cut and print. Thank Allah, that was our last flag. I'm glad I remembered to bring 50."

5. Have Jane Fonda take pictures of herself draped across their AA batteries.

6. Adapt the current Palestinian method of dressing like the IDF to avoid targeting.

7. Attempt to launch mid range missles at Israel which accidentally fall into the West Bank. Blame Israel for not being "near enough to reach, which blocks the peace process."

8. Abject surrender before bomb one detonates.

13 posted on 07/23/2002 10:44:31 AM PDT by Shryke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Destructor
Goats
14 posted on 07/23/2002 10:49:14 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
You know, you'd think that as they watch us get geared up to kick Iraq's @ss, they'd just sit there and be quiet- not try to draw attention to themselves, you know? You see they're just getting into the name calling and sabre rattling now that would spiral upwards into war. What could they possibly be thinking?
15 posted on 07/23/2002 10:57:27 AM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
What could they possibly be thinking?

I suspect that they are more threatened of a post-Saddam Iraq than the status quo and are making these gestures in an attempt to deter an American attack. Their regime is beset with a young populace eager to go western. Having a long term U.S presence in Iraq, threatens their power base internally, IMO.

16 posted on 07/23/2002 11:32:22 AM PDT by TADSLOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Ill bite your head off.
17 posted on 07/23/2002 11:37:10 AM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Iran might disappear in minimum time as well. Tell the ayatollah's that we'll rock and rolla over them!
18 posted on 07/23/2002 1:08:03 PM PDT by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Translation: we have multiple terror cells in place and with orders to strike if we are hit.

IMHO we just do it and absorb the blows. There is no other path.

--Boris

19 posted on 07/23/2002 6:20:31 PM PDT by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
"Any fast and short term action by the United States against the Islamic republic will receive multiple and varied responses," he warned.

Multiple and varied responses such as:


20 posted on 07/23/2002 6:58:04 PM PDT by usconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson