1 posted on
07/11/2002 9:06:09 AM PDT by
mbynack
To: mbynack
Whoa! They are in big trouble.
I dare say that this could even bring a strongly worded memo down on them. Perhaps even a mild rebuke.....
At which time the media will totally trash the Bush administration for viciously targeting a motherly public interest group.
2 posted on
07/11/2002 9:14:38 AM PDT by
El Sordo
To: mbynack
"Cooling off periods" That one rates right up there with "assault rifles" and "cop-killer bullets."
To: mbynack
5 posted on
07/11/2002 9:26:02 AM PDT by
mvpel
To: mbynack; Admin Moderator
fix the HTML in this post so that the images work... so we can archive it.
either that or freeze this post, and repost it with the correct image tags and link from this to the new post.
To: mbynack; William A. Levinson
Bill, great work. I'll send the Levin part to Rocky's campaign.
To: mbynack
MMM didn't just lie to the IRS; it also lied to the "mainstream" media!
MMM's claims to the "mainstream" media that it got 750,000 contradicted other claims it made in its press kit handed out at the event.
MMM, though, has about disappeared. Two years later, its followup events - in Washington and elsewhere - have been miserable flops. Soros is no longer funding MMM, either - evidently due to its failure to attract a grassroots.
Scandals of antigun activists - including true facts about "Million" Mom March!
To: mbynack
11 posted on
07/11/2002 9:46:04 AM PDT by
archy
To: mbynack
Million Moms Submitted Inaccurate Statements to the Internal Revenue Service GO FIGURE!!!
To: mbynack
Outstanding Effort!!
18 posted on
07/11/2002 10:34:44 AM PDT by
bert
To: AnnaZ; HangFire; Lady Jenn; Kithlyara; AZ Spartacus; feinswinesuksass; abigail2; AnneJustice4all; ..
Belles bump
To: mbynack
If a church did this they would lose their tax exemption in a heartbeat.
20 posted on
07/11/2002 10:59:17 AM PDT by
Djarum
To: mbynack
FYI: Here is a link to Jim March's
"The Commie Mommie Files". Jim is one of those who exposed the fradulent use of public property in San Francisco by the Mommies.
21 posted on
07/11/2002 11:06:31 AM PDT by
Redcloak
To: mbynack; AnnaZ; Mercuria; Jeff Head; technochick99
Gonna be a whole lot of happy bail bondsmen running around.....million moms x 30K in bail money, carry the two naught naught add 4 % x .2343 = ........
Stay Safe ya'll !!
22 posted on
07/11/2002 11:13:27 AM PDT by
Squantos
To: mbynack
Say it ain't so, Moe. I'm
shocked I tell you.....
SHOCKED to hear that little Susie Dees Thomas was involved in anything underhanded.
Ahaha
24 posted on
07/11/2002 1:32:47 PM PDT by
Twodees
To: mbynack; All
All persons interested in seeing what this site had indexed for research on Second Amendment issues, click the
bang_list:
27 posted on
07/11/2002 2:18:15 PM PDT by
backhoe
To: mbynack
"inaccurate" implys some kind of addition error. As a CPA I would like to advise that it is a "fraudulant" return. There is no difference than this and those "evil corporate CFOs" who signed off on "inaccurate" financial statements.
This word is brought to you by Enron, Global Crossing, Merck, Worldcomm, Waste Management,Qwest Communications and Arthur Andersen.
To: mbynack
Hey---ALL gungrabbers lie. Why is this a surprise???
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson