Posted on 07/05/2002 6:25:02 AM PDT by SheLion
A group of dedicated health specialists met again this week to fine-tune its plan to encourage every school in Maine to get rid of sodas, chips and other non-nutritional items.
They have put together an information packet warning against soda and chips as major causes of a current epidemic of obesity and tooth decay throughout the country but especially in Maine. The packet includes research articles and fact sheets designed to persuade students, parents, teachers and school administrators that the campaign is one tangible, practical means of improving health and heading off future disease. The committee has met with vending machine companies and obtained assurances of cooperation.
The next step will be to develop a strategy presentation for individual school districts. Pilot projects in several Maine communities are scheduled to start March 1, 2003, After evaluation of the results, the statewide campaign is slated for the school year starting in September 2004.
One question that arose in this weeks meeting was how best to get the students to realize that it is up to them to control their own diet and escape from the vending-machine monopolies in many schools that promote consumption of the big-name drinks that are heavy on sugar and caffeine.
A nutritionist suggested permitting a choice between healthful and unhealthful items. Others believe that, if given a choice, many students will take the junk.
Another question is how the vending companies may respond to the campaign. Milk and plain water must be carefully defined or some vendor may come up with a pricey new variation. How about Coke-flavored milk?
The committee is preparing for the day when it will seek wider publicity. It is drafting model news stories and news releases. One suggestion, unanimously approved, was that they drop the technical term dental caries in their fact sheets and refer simply to plain old tooth decay. That was a step in the right direction.
As far as people saying it's unhealthy. Well, we all know it is. It's kind of like ice cream. We all know it's unhealthy also, but we sure love a few of those unhealthy things.
I actually also don't care if a private school has soda machines. I figure it's the right of a private school to do what they wish.
Oh MAN!!! If I hear this line of adoration from the folks up here in Masachusetts, I AM GOING TO GO FREAKING BERSERK!!!!!
I had some lady squawking at me that its shameful that every child is literate in Cuba while here they are not.
Yeah, they can only read government sanctioned books and they are FORCED to learn through violence. If you let me run the school systems up here like a prison I would get results too.
I have read of thier school sytem and it is HORRIBLE! I cant believe these libs HATED Apartheid but love Castro's(Not you Larry, I am speaking of my Mass bretheren.) policies, what does that tell you?
I was against Apartheid and I am against Castro. At least I stand against monsters no matter what political stripe they are. I must say that Apartheid was NOWHERE NEAR as bad as Castro's tinpot regime.
Glad I got that off my chest. :D
Correct, Larry! I'm Greek, so you can take my word that democracy means mob rule. Demos = mob, crowd. 175 posted on 7/6/02 2:32 PM Eastern by metesky
liberallarry, get lost and leave me alone, ok? In fact , leave ALL of us alone!
Your getting tiring......
You keep this up and I will turn you in for abuse.
It takes a brave man to post on a forum that is as Conservative as this one.
Since he is not a disruptor Shelion, I think that he has every right to be here and it might be useful to listen to input from the other side of the aisle.
Back to medicine. You see my problem. Rural areas can't afford modern medicine - as presently practiced - and are looking for alternatives. In that way we have something in common with third-world countries - which is why I was interested in Cuba. If they have nothing to offer then I'm back to square one.
I have two directions which seem promising;
1)Increased emphasis on the preventative. It's a lot cheaper to stay healthy than to try to recover your health. I've already run into a problem on that one. The people most in need of health care are the very ones who are too lazy or stupid to pay attention to what they're doing. They think a pill and some tax-payer supported free medicine are all they need. None the less I want to keep going.
2) "para-doctors". To do this we need to change some laws - and will undoubtedly run into opposition from doctors. So we'd like to be prepared.
All hospitals have to comply with new seismic standards or shut down. We have some time. A group of 13 rural hospitals have combined to try to come up with a single design which will meet everyones' needs. Much cheaper that way. But to come up with a new design we have to figure out what sort of medicine we can reasonably be expected to deliver in the next 10 years or so. ????
Again, any help you can offer, any referrals you can make would be greatly appreciated.
We also realize we have to build to minimum needs - to reduce cost and the chance of waste. No point in building a surgury if we'll never be able to afford surgeons.
I am obviousley not in a rural area but I do know a few medical people who might be able to give me some ideas to bounce off of you.
I myself am as perplexed by your situation as you are.
This topic is bookmarked and I will add further to it when I can give you a worthy contribution.
A very difficult problem you have there, dont let it get you down.
If you have something to offer - other than mindless criticism - feel free. I'm open to it.
What do you propose to do about it? Ram you're beliefs down everyone else's throat by force of law?
Our "hospital" has 37 beds. 33 are devoted to acute care - and are profitable (more or less). The other four are to service the ER - and are terribly costly. We also provide X-ray and some lab services. We can't keep a doctor in town. But we must have one on call to staff the ER. So we have a costly contract which brings doctors up here on a rotating basis. Not a great solution. Often people don't like what we get.
Not sure about mobile services. If we have them I'm not aware. The regional hospital is 65 miles away and is good enough to deliver most - but not all - services. The nearest full service hospital is 300 miles away.
There's an additional problem: We don't really get paid for the services we provide. Medicare, Medical, the insurance companies, the HMO's...none of them pay the real cost. We have to negociate for everything. AND we must take everyone - including complete indigents. If we could charge fair price for our services we wouldn't have a problem. But then virtually no one would have any medical care.
Barring some dramatic and unforeseen change in technology, the law, and/or organization the future is as you describe. Regional hospitals in the biggest towns in the counties. Smaller towns losing services and gradually drying up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.