Skip to comments.
Al Qaeda said to be planning on Web
Washington Times ^
| Saturday, June 22, 2002
| By Neil Doyle
Posted on 06/21/2002 11:54:39 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
Edited on 07/12/2004 3:54:53 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
LONDON
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; terrorism; terrorwar
To: JohnHuang2
"People are mistaking their competence because they think of these men as living in caves and primitive, which is far from the truth, indeed."Not me.
When I heard they were using steganography, I knew they were sophisticated. Low budget, no access to good military hardware -- but sophisticated with the tools they have.
2
posted on
06/22/2002 12:01:12 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
To: Lazamataz
Morning, amigo
To: Lazamataz
steganography,I have never seen this word before and have no idea what it means. (And it's not in my college year's Collegiate Dictionary.) I know I sound pretty dumb here, but what does it mean?
4
posted on
06/22/2002 12:07:07 AM PDT
by
Salvation
To: JohnHuang2
Morning for YOU, Vampire. :o)
Me, I'm just getting in after some power work then some power playing. :o) I'm gonna grab my puppy and my woman and head to bed soon. :o)
BTW: You rock. Any chance we will ever meet in person? I really want to meet you before I shuffle off this mortal coil.....You are, like, one of my very favorite people.....
For a vampire, that is....
5
posted on
06/22/2002 12:07:31 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
To: Salvation
Steganography is the science of encoding messages in music or photographic digital files. You make the message 'disappear' by making it seem more like statistical sampling 'noise'. It is somewhat difficult to detect a steganographic message, particularly if it is also encrypted via PGP or some other robust cryptographic technology.
I studied cryptology as a hobby for a few years way back when. One thing I discovered is that if you encrypt an already-encrypted message, the mathematic 'feedback' between the two processes causes the message to be drastically easier to crack. Rule: Encrypt only once, or become transparant.
6
posted on
06/22/2002 12:12:13 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
To: Lazamataz
lol!
Sure, we'll meet in person...er, (in vampire...?)...oh, well.
You'll need directions to my cave, though. Not easy to find...and gotta make sure it's at night...ya know...hehe
To: JohnHuang2

Even though you thirst for human blood, I still love ya.
Not in a gay way, mind you.
8
posted on
06/22/2002 12:13:51 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
To: JohnHuang2
I can't wait until we meet. You rock.
9
posted on
06/22/2002 12:14:37 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
To: Lazamataz
Are there algorythmic decryptions available through which they can check their vulnerability?
10
posted on
06/22/2002 12:19:11 AM PDT
by
MHGinTN
To: MHGinTN
Steganpgraphy is tricky. You gotta know a message exists to decode it. And even if you know it exists, if it is encrypted, it helps a lot to have an original copy of the music or pic to crack it.
It's not easy. People who want to communicate via steganography have a leg up.
To: Lazamataz
Is there a possible connect-the-dots to the recent mpg/CD copying game? Are we not vigilant?
12
posted on
06/22/2002 12:31:43 AM PDT
by
MHGinTN
To: Lazamataz
Low tech sophistication bump.
13
posted on
06/22/2002 12:47:33 AM PDT
by
Cacique
To: Lazamataz
Yeah, we know you rock too but we don't take it for granite.
Did your mom ever make you wash out your mouth with soapstone?
14
posted on
06/22/2002 3:10:36 AM PDT
by
piasa
To: *TerrOrWar
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson