Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Puts U.N. Security Council on the Spot Over Immunity From New War Crimes Tribunal
AP Breaking News/ Tampa Bay Online ^ | June 20, 2002 | Edith M. Lederer/Associated Press Writer

Posted on 06/20/2002 4:33:20 AM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!

UNITED NATIONS (AP) - The United States is threatening to stop helping with U.N. peacekeeping operations unless U.S. participants are given immunity from the new international war crimes tribunal.

A draft resolution presented by the United States to the U.N. Security Council on Wednesday would exempt peacekeepers from prosecution, and U.S. officials say they won't send Americans on such missions unless they receive that protection.

Critics see the draft resolution as a U.S. effort to undermine the International Criminal Court, which is opposed by the Bush administration. The international pact creating the court takes effect July 1.

Sixty-seven countries have ratified the Rome treaty establishing the court, and there is wide support for it among the 15 Security Council members. Six have ratified the treaty, while six others have signed and plan to ratify it. Even China, which hasn't signed, backs it in principle.

The United States remains the only vocal opponent of the court. Former President Bill Clinton signed the treaty, but it was never ratified by the Senate. In early May, the Bush administration said it wants nothing to do with the treaty or the tribunal itself.

When U.S. deputy ambassador Richard Williamson introduced the draft resolution Wednesday demanding immunity, he said Washington's position would not change.

"We will not put American men or women under the reach of the International Criminal Court while serving in a United Nations peacekeeping operation," he said.

The draft resolution demands that the council grant immunity from arrest and prosecution by the court to all participants in operations established or authorized by the Security Council, not just Americans.

This would apply not only to soldiers in U.N. peacekeeping missions and civilians in U.N. peace-building activities, but to participants in operations authorized by the United Nations such as the NATO-led forces in Bosnia and Kosovo and the international force in Afghanistan.

There are currently over 700 Americans serving in U.N. missions and thousands in Bosnia, Kosovo and Afghanistan.

While the Security Council has approved special tribunals to prosecute serious crimes committed in Rwanda and former Yugoslav states, the International Criminal Court will be the world's first permanent tribunal.

AP-ES-06-20-02 0703EDT

This story can be found at : http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGAZMD4JO2D.html


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; christianlist; fromnew; icc; nwo; onthespot; overimmunity; securitycouncil; tribunal; un; unlist; usputsun; warcrimes

1 posted on 06/20/2002 4:33:20 AM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: seamole; backhoe; freedomnews; RippleFire; madfly; *UN_List; *"NWO"; Alamo-Girl; amom; ...

2 posted on 06/20/2002 4:36:33 AM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
the problem with the u.s. not wanting
to cooperate with this new international court is we seem to be the ones knocking on it's door more
so than anyone else.
3 posted on 06/20/2002 4:48:03 AM PDT by reform4me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
"Even China, which hasn't signed, backs it in principle."

And the point is.....?

(Thank you President Bush for your leadership and doing the right thing here for America.)

4 posted on 06/20/2002 4:55:14 AM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
Look http://tm0.com/IHT/sbct.cgi?s= 219609282&i=573425&m=1 &d=2792600 here for article on how EU made deal to protect their own - but not US troops.
5 posted on 06/20/2002 6:13:04 AM PDT by Elkiejg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson