Posted on 06/14/2002 2:56:11 PM PDT by Skeet
Georgia’s fiery Republican Rep. Bob Barr (Ga.) has never been particularly popular among his Democratic colleagues. He was, after all, the first member of Congress to call for former President Clinton’s impeachment and has never cut his opponents much slack on issues that concern him.
What’s more, the man’s ubiquitous. He fights for his beliefs in committee, on the House floor and in the media. As a result, he’s been a target ever since his 1994 arrival in town and this time they believe they may be able to get him.
Oh, they know he won’t be taken out in a general election. They’ve tried that and failed, but now they’re banking on getting his fellow Republicans to do him in for them. The Democrats had a field day redistricting Georgia and one of the benefits of their ultimate scheme was throwing Barr into a newly created district with fellow Republican Rep. John Linder. They’re hoping that Linder can beat him in the GOP primary.
It’s not that they like Linder all that much. His voting record differs so little from Barr’s that the two men stipulated at a recent debate — or “joint appearance” as they call such things these days — that they agree on just about everything. It’s just that the Democrats simply cannot stand Barr.
During that appearance the two combatants suggested that since they do agree on just about everything (The American Conservative Union rates Barr at 100 percent and Linder at 96 percent) voters might want to make their selection based upon which man’s “style” they find most appealing.
Linder, an old-style conservative who gained at least a smidgen of notoriety toiling as then-Speaker Newt Gingrich’s handpicked man at the National Republican Congressional Committee or NRCC, hasn’t been heard from since Newt left the House. He’s what conservative activists sometimes refer to as “House-broken.”
He is, in short, relatively uncontroversial if only because he doesn’t get up in the morning ready to go to war for his beliefs or much of anything else. The House is largely made up of folks just like him … good men and women on both sides of the aisle who go to work in the morning, do their job and rarely make waves. Most of them get reelected and, to be perfectly honest, Congress couldn’t function without them.
Indeed, a Congress filled with Bob Barrs would be both difficult to picture and hard to manage. Imagine 435 men and women brimming with ideas, unwilling to compromise on matters of principle, and ready to take on all comers in the fight for what they see as right. It might be fun to watch, but probably wouldn’t produce much.
But a Congress without a few Bob Barrs would be even worse. It would be easy to manage but incredibly boring.
The question is whether the voters of Georgia’s new 7th Congressional District will recognize this or whether they’ll opt for a candidate who’ll vote right and let others carry the fight. The numbers favor Linder since much of the new district includes voters who have supported him in the past, but primary voters are a fiery bunch and may just decide to opt for a fighter. At least that’s what Barr is hoping because one suspects he wouldn’t change his approach to what he does even if he could.
Poll data from the district suggests the Republicans who will make this choice on August 20th like both men. As a result the primary will be close and the winner will be the candidate who can inspire and motivate his supporters.
Barr and Linder suggest their differences are largely stylistic. That’s only partially true because their stylistic differences go to their relative willingness to take risks on behalf of their beliefs and their overall influence. Bob Barr is an innovator and a leader. He’s considered partisan by those who don’t like him, but he’s fought for privacy and individual rights alongside folks like Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) to reform our civil forfeiture laws and the American Civil Liberties Union in warning about the future dangers lurking in our nation’s response to Osama bin Laden and his buddies.
He’s raised important questions that a Congress without a few Bob Barrs might never even consider. In fact, I believe that a Congress without him would be poorer for his absence and I hope his constituents agree.
Neither can the libertarians. They have vowed to do all they can to defeat Barr because he offends their pro-dope sensibilites.
That she would air the details of her failed marriage with the likes of Larry Flynt tells me all I want to know about the woman.
It would take me weeks, maybe months, to relate all the things I've done but warned others not to do.
Look...we know the game you are playing. Seen it a thousand times with liberal attacks on Dr. Laura and others. Liberals all giddy because somebody didn't live up to what they say. Big deal. I care about the tone people try to set. Liberals who play your game have zero intregrity. That is what infuriates them about people such as Bob Barr.I could care what peole who wallow in filth, like it and suggest others partake think about those who try to or suggest others rise above the filth.
Your attempt to slime an honorable man, based on charges from someone as slimy as Larry Flynt, are despicable. You sir, are an ass.
There are many facts that are known in the media but not well reported upon.
It would be nice if we stopped reacting to the vile leftist media and got the facts before we react.
Dubious tie.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.