Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Phila-ped-o-philes
WYLL.com, NewsMax.com, IllinoisLeader.com, FederalObserver.com, RFMNews.com ^ | 6.3.2002 | Kevin McCullough

Posted on 06/03/2002 12:25:24 PM PDT by KMC1

It seems remarkable to me that the judges in the Federal Appellate Court in Philadelphia could come to the decision that they did. Obviously none of them have used a filtered internet service. Or maybe they themselves just love their porn and begin to get huffy anytime some moralistic person claims its not the best thing. Nonetheless their ruling last week that CIPA, the Children's Internet Protection Act, was too broad and would block speech that was protected was utterly ignorant.

Though they are not alone.

In Illinois last week, a bill that was designed to require all public libraries in the state easily won its way through the state senate. The coalition within the state that has worked tirelessly to get such legislation in place was promised by the Speaker of the House that the State Reps would also vote on the measure. His words were that he, "would see to it personally," that the bill would be brought to the floor and be voted up or down. But alas, to no avail, the great Illinois bait and switch was pulled, and elected leaders stand around, a stupefied look upon their face and their mouth hanging open, and in a voice strangely reminiscent of Deputy Dawg, with perhaps a twinge of pot smoking thrown in, they utter, "well I thought I was voting for the right bill."

Good grief, elected legislators are supposed to understand what is coming in front of them before they vote on it.

Not that they weren't truly misled - they were. One state representative David Miller, was publicly rebuked by his own pastor, Rev. James Meeks, Sunday morning, both in their own church service, but also before the eyes and ears of all of Chicago on their television broadcast. Rep. Miller had been the instigator of the "bait & switch". Knowing that the bill that had passed the Senate in overwhelming numbers - and was likely to in the House, if it ever saw the light of day. Mr. Miller went to work quickly on behalf of the American Library Association, as well as the mayor's office. He sponsored a counterfeit bill that does nothing to protect kids, filter porn, or prosecute pedophiles who may use the public libraries to get their jollies and then go look for kids to act out against. Infact, Mr. Miller was told to "find another church!" Strong language, but when you consider that Pastor Meeks and the folks at Salem Baptist had been successful in helping get him elected - it seems all the more an appropriate response.

But he was not the only one, Illinois House Speaker Mike Madigan had promised to the coalition leaders that he would get the good bill out of committee and to the floor for a vote. His daughter - who desperately wishes to be the next Attorney General had co-sponsored it in the Senate. But if it was such an important issue to Mr. Madigan you sure couldn't tell from the way he stood by watching the bill die, like a murderer who lingers over the corpse until the last bit of breath is gone.

State Senator Patrick O'Malley, who authored the Senate bill, was warmly thanked by the 3000 marchers, who only one week prior had rallied in downtown Chicago to put pressure on lawmakers to make it happen. Joe Birkett, the state's attorney, who is also running for attorney general, and who has filed written support of the federal measure for protecting children in the online market place, assured me personally that if elected, targeting internet crime, and the people who commit it will be a top priority on the state-wide level. (Including pedophiles who get Chicago Mayor Richard Daley endorsed smut on the Chicago Public Library computers!)

The coalition leaders here in Illinois are planning more marches. One will be held soon on Chicago city hall, where once school is out Bishop Larry Trotter and Reverend James Meeks will lead 10,000 students to a sit in. And if necessary Bishop Trotter and his churches in Chicago, Washington DC, and around the United States, Reverend Meeks and his 15,000 members, Concerned Women for America, Eagle Forum, AM 1160 WYLL Chicago, and literally countless more will march in DC when the Supreme Court readies to hear the appeal on CIPA.

A national movement has had its fuse lit. The passivity of elected officials, who have shown their demonstrable love for pedophiles, who wish to masturbate in our nation's libraries, as opposed to protecting the children who come to use the library to learn, is turning the stomachs of all those who hear about it. A tide is rising and reasonable people from Asheville, North Carolina, to Sacramento, California, are saying,

"What do we want - FILTERS!" and "when do we want 'em?"

"NOW!"


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: Illinois; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: appellatecourts; children; constitution; filters; internet; justice; pedophile; pornography
Kevin McCullough is heard weekdays 3-5pm on AM1160 WYLL Chicago and worldwide on the internet at www.wyll.com.

Contact Kevin at kmc@wyll.com

1 posted on 06/03/2002 12:25:24 PM PDT by KMC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bob j
Someone else talks in third person. You're not alone!
2 posted on 06/03/2002 12:27:33 PM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KMC1
Texaggie79 would listen to Kevin, but he is in Alabama. Texaggie79 is sorry......
3 posted on 06/03/2002 12:30:16 PM PDT by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KMC1
Think of the children. How can we expect them to learn about sex, if we don't allow them to surf pr0n at their local library? I mean, us mean ole conservatives make such a big fuss about the homosexual laden liberals indoctrinating our kids at their schools......
4 posted on 06/03/2002 12:32:41 PM PDT by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KMC1
steve-b is looking for a fat commercial-reading contract. It would have to be a different one, of course, since steve-b does not need any little blue pills....
5 posted on 06/03/2002 12:33:23 PM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KMC1
I can't remember-- do HATE crimes really exist in law, or was it all just a bad dream? Hard core and porn on the internet ought to be considered a HATE crime, because it really has nothing to do with sex (speech)-- but a lot to do with hate and violence (the product or result). Right? You know, like rape-- it's not about the sex, it's about the feeling of POWER and making other people feel powerless. Taking a more liberal point of view can be so much more refreshing-- Has anyone ever tried that one on the Supremes? Public libraries could swear to help prevent hate crimes-- you know, like the rest of us swore to look out for terrorists. :-)
6 posted on 06/03/2002 12:47:02 PM PDT by let freedom sing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KMC1
Even IF the courts erroneously decide that the government cannot require libraries to block porn, that STILL doesn't mean they cannot block the porn voluntarily if the public outcry is strong enough. Free, voluntary restraint is different from forced restraint. Ahh....but the left WANTS the porn, and this isn't about the First Amendment and freedom at all. The left always argues "because we CAN be immoral we MUST be immoral", that, of course, is hogwash!
7 posted on 06/03/2002 12:52:45 PM PDT by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
Right on. The first amendment applies to whether someone has the right to offer pornography to the public. It says nothing about whether someone (including a town library) has to consume it. If our townspeople wish not to have pornography in our library, that is our right.
8 posted on 06/03/2002 1:35:27 PM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: KMC1
Once again, right wing idiots trying to make it seem as easy to filter porn as snapping their fingers and it magically disappearing. Filtering software does not work. You cannot control it. It blocks out libertarian, liberal, neo-con and religious sites because it is notorious for having a left-wing bent on what it filters. Pink.com was left out of a local high school's filters, but FreeRepublic, the LP official website and my Ska/Punk music website were blocked. Porn allowed, political and music information blocked. Go figure. That is typical of what filtering software does. In most cases, the librarians wouldn't have enough priveleges to unblock a legitimate website. That means that they also don't have the authority to add porn sites that get through (gee... the other 75% of all porn sites....). Getting filtering software vendors to get their product to block all porn is technically and economically a pipe dream. It's like getting the DEA to finally put an end to the drug trade.

If they are ever anything approaching 100% successful, who would buy their updates? You do realize that they make almost no money on the software, that virtually all of it is from selling updates to the site databases they maintain? I hope you do, because you would be a moron to think they're going to "innovate" themselves out of a job.

9 posted on 06/03/2002 2:13:57 PM PDT by dheretic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KMC1
"In Illinois last week, a bill that was designed to require all public libraries in the state easily won its way through the state senate."

Hmm. I thought there already were public libraries in that state. And they want to "require" them? OK, we got 'em.

Now what?

--Boris

10 posted on 06/03/2002 6:30:45 PM PDT by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson