Posted on 05/13/2002 3:51:13 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
The assassination of Pim Fortuyn, a Dutch rightwing politician who was outspoken against the influx of Muslims into Holland and the rest of Europe, and an opponent of immigration, needs to be seen in the larger context of how the growing Muslim population is having an impact throughout Europe and Great Britain.
Americans tend to pay little attention to other nations unless they pose a threat to our national security. It is doubtful that the average American could tell you much about the politics of Great Britain or European nations. The recent French elections got everyone’s attention because an avowed anti-Semite gained 17% of the vote that led to a run-off and repudiation. His brief moment in the spotlight, however, sent a shiver down the spine of those who recalled or know of the politics of the 1930s that led to World War II.
The United States has officially declared its opposition to three nations designated an "axis of evil", Iraq, Iran and North Korea. Other nations are designated as terrorist states, but European nations remain identified as allies, despite their reluctance to support US foreign policy. Moreover, these nations have formed the European Union in order to acquire more power for their region of the world. Great Britain has flirted with the idea of joining the EU, but so far has resisted.
It may surprise you, therefore, to learn that Muslims are the second largest religious group in England after the Anglican majority. There are some two million Muslims in Great Britain. They are not indigenous to England, being largely newcomers from Pakistan, Bangladesh, and India. Others come from Africa, Asia, and even Europe. The Muslims of England are very diverse in many ways, except for their faith in Islam.
Increasingly, though, demands have grown for education of Muslim children to reflect their religion, for official recognition of the Islamic faith. Native-born Brits are less than thrilled with their growing numbers and demands. Still, a recent poll by Eastern Eye, an Asian newspaper published in the UK, revealed that 87% of the Muslims polled said they are loyal to Britain, even though 64% were opposed to the US-led military action against Afghanistan.
The vote in France for Le Pen, a candidate with extreme right-wing political views, was generated by a growing concern of ordinary, native-born Frenchmen and women regarding their Muslim population and other immigrants. Here again, the fact that some four million Muslims are the second largest religious group in France may come as a surprise; more than half of them are French citizens. They are largely the result of France’s colonial past, especially in the North African region.
Most of the Muslim community in France are from nations called the "Maghreb", Algeria, Morocco, and Tunisia. Others come from Turkey, Senegal, and Mali. Some are converts. Islam has a long history in France. Ironically, the spread of Islam into Europe was ended with their defeat at Poitiers, France, in 732. It would not be until 1683 when Muslims were defeated near Vienna, that further expansion efforts ended in Europe. Now Muslims merely immigrate to European nations.
France’s situation is particularly instructive. Immigration began in earnest in the 1950s, primarily from Maghreb nations. There are some five million Muslims in France. For decades, the religion was largely invisible and Muslims represented the lowest rungs of the economic and social ladder, but second and third generation French Muslims, in the 1990s, underwent a re-conversion of sorts, joining the ranks of radical Islam to seek an identity in a society from which they felt excluded.
This is interesting, too, because, twenty years ago, the demand for official recognition of Islam led to the Charter of Muslim Faith that defined how a French Muslim could remain faithful to both Islam and France. Today, native French citizens tend to regard Muslims as a danger to their society. The French government, however, has seen integration of Muslims into French society as a wiser path than some form of de facto isolation.
Following 9.11 and the US retaliation in Afghanistan, the French magazine for Muslims, La Medina, organized a public meeting to discuss its significance for Islam. In a converted warehouse just north of central Paris, in October, a large crowd of French Muslims, mostly from North Africa, gathered. One speaker was a 39-year-old Swiss professor, Tariq Ramadan, the grandson of a man who founded Egypt’s Islamic revival movement, the radical Muslim Brotherhood, in the 1930s. "Now more than ever, we need to criticize some of our brothers," he told the packed hall. "My dignity depends on saying ‘You are unjustified if you use the Koran to justify murder.’" No doubt his grandfather is doing cartwheels in his grave.
Reportedly, the overwhelming majority of Europe’s Muslims see their religion as a moderate one. There are 12.5 million Muslims throughout Europe and they are in the process of redefining Islam as people born and bred in Europe. This may be the beginning of a much-needed Reformation within Islam that occurred and redefined Christianity after the Dark Ages.
Having noted the Muslim defeat outside of Vienna, Austria in 1683, it would not be until 1878 before Muslims appeared in greater numbers as the result of the annexation of Bosnia-Herzegovina and other territories by the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Currently, Muslims are the third largest religion in Austria and growing. Their numbers doubled between 1981 and 1991. These Muslims are largely immigrants and are often political refugees. The bulk are formerly Turkish and citizens of the former Yugoslavia. The recent Balkan wars drove a lot of Muslims to choose Austria as a homeland. There are also distinct and visible Iranian and Arab minorities as well.
The relationship between Muslim minorities and the State of Austria has been formalized and regulated since 1912 by the Islam Act that officially recognized the religion. It led to the establishment of the Muslim Faith Union in 1979 and Austrians Muslims are taught their faith in public schools with teachers paid by the State. The rise of nationalistic political parties in Austria reflects a concern seen in France. Increasingly, a growing portion of native Austrians are suspicious and fearful of Muslims.
In Poland, chiefly Polish-Lithuanian Tartars, a group estimated between two and three thousand, have lived in that nation for some 600 years. Their small numbers versus the overwhelmingly Catholic Poles has left them largely ignored. Muslims, however, in the post-Soviet Caucasus are a different situation entirely. A growing fundamentalism has, for example, led the Chechyans to use terrorism and war on the Russians to seek a separate nation. The Russians have responded much as the US has in Afghanistan.
Several former Russian provinces, now independent, but allied republics, have large, if not dominant Muslim populations. These include Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kryghyezstan, and Kazakhstan. Add to this, Albania. The recent Balkan wars were largely religious movements by Muslims and, ironically, the US sided with them and against the Serbians. So did the rest of Europe.
So, now, when you say Europe, it’s wise to keep in mind that the nations that compose it are increasingly home to a growing population of Muslims. Wherever a population of Muslims gains in numbers, they begin to demand autonomy or a change in the governmental structure to reflect Islamic law. This is going to lead to a long religious war, an Islamic Jihad. Not all Muslims will support it, but few can be expected to speak out against it.
Dogs are very good judges of character.
Perhaps the mohammedans just can't train them due to Dogs superior character, loyalty and intelligence.
A whole mass of people afraid of dogs and wimmin... yeesh
Right on! And the Clash has been going on since the founding of Islam, and its spread – by the sword - throughout the Mideast and the World. This clash of civilizations is the DOMINANT theme of history.
Good thought … after WWII ten million Catholics in Eastern Europe were ceded to the Communists who systematically destroyed religion. Now, two generations later, they too are low-hanging fruit.
I had to stop and think what I had in my head back in May when I wrote that... I think some of what I was pointing at is the way the societies in Western Culture have for decades now (particularly since WWII) had as a stated goal to become more liberal, more 'tolerant'. This was fed by the guilt people felt stemming from the Holocaust. People wanted to make sure a minority would no longer be demonized. This carried over naturally in the Civil Rights Movement and this attitude of "zero tolerance" for intolerance is very visible today.
What this means, however, is we are faced in a situation today where we have been taught to be tolerant of those who have as a stated goal the complete overthrow of our way of life and thinking. The Muslims divide the world into the House of War and the House of Peace. We, infidels, are not in the good half of this bargain. Yet our entire cultural apparatus nowadays is aimed at "inclusiveness"- in effect, welcoming our enemies with open arms.
To hate another people, or to brand them as evil is effectively taboo in much of the Western World today. The Europeans actually swoon with nausea at the mere thought of such a thing (seemingly). There is no unified front (from our culture) against our common enemy. Even the USA cannot properly name the enemy or the situation- instead we must cloak our mission behind the vague moniker "War on Terror".
I don't think the Muslim world will overthrow us- I really don't. The point I was trying to make is the situation is very grim and it has reached a head now. The liberals like to refer to the spiral/cycle/circle of violence. It is apt in this situation. Every action now will lead to the next. The things we have to do to protect ourselves will further inflame fundie jihadis. Their retaliation will provoke us to further protect ourselves etc etc. It can't be stopped now and in a way it was always inevitable IMHO.
But if the USA doesn't stand firm- there is no other mechanism to protect against the spread of radical Islam throughout our culture because the liberals have been steadily at work against Christianity for years and years. There would have been a time when if all else failed, the Church would've stepped up and taken on this foe. This is what the Crusades were. But the Church has been disconnected from the process in today's Western Culture. Young people don't look to it for answers and in many cases you have young people actually identifying more with the religion of our enemy than with the traditional religion of our own culture.
The only State in the World that still has all the necessary ingrediants to fight Islam is Israel- again, in my opinion. They have the will to fight. They have a cultural impetus to fight- meaning they feel like they have an ancient mandate from God to be in Israel and to keep it for the Jews and they are a strongly religious society, even if they are modern. They are not squeamish, they know who their enemy is and are not afraid to say so. Even if the political apparatus should fail them their very culture is firmly embedded in their religion and their belief system will give them the strength to oppose the jihadis.
Like I said- I don't think the US would ever be conquered by the Muslims. But Europe? Sure. It's happening before our eyes. Australia? They have the same elements of "tolerance at any cost" within their society that is working against the Euros. South America is staunchly Catholic, but then they're not a serious military threat either. The Muslims have a firm hold on Asia, a spreading control of Africa. If America could be militarily defeated or crippled to the point it was no longer interested in the fate of Israel and the Middle East- the situation I described would be a de facto reality. The entire world of Islam against Israel and American dominance receding or at least an America that had to totally disconnect from its traditional allies (Europe, Australia).
The strength I attribute to Israel is also the strength of our enemy to by the way. Their core morality, their core value system is religious and is deeply entwined in their political process. They feel that God has commanded them to spread his will throughout the entire world. Even if they have a Shah of Iran who is western friendly, they have religious leaders who pick up the ball and lead the masses in the direction of their perceived values- which of course are interpreted to be the direct will of God.
In essence, this is a medieval battle on a 21st century battlefield. My hope for my fellow man is that we will find the strength to see the fight to the finish.
Betcha the hatred is more than mutual. Think "Tribbles and Klingons".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.