Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Freedom Fighters-FR mentioned in Liberal paper
badger herald ^ | 05/09/02 | Kate McDonald

Posted on 05/09/2002 11:21:02 AM PDT by ElRushbo

Freedom fighters

by Kate MacDonald, Staff Writer May 09, 2002

One of the most influential and monumental First Amendment battles of this new millennium is being fought in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The unhappy marriage of print media and the Internet has finally reached an impasse. Free Republic bills itself as a "loosely organized group of grassroots Americans who support the constitution and look for honesty, integrity and honor from those in government." Nice PR. Really, this staunchly conservative activist group's popularity and fondness for a good battle have turned quite a few heads on Capitol Hill. Active members, who call themselves FReepers, include Dr. Alan Keyes, Gary Aldrich, Sean Hannity, Ann Coulter, Congressman Bob Barr and Matt Drudge. In its fifth year, the Free Republic has grown to over 60,000 members with chapters all over the country. The crux of their movement is Freerepublic.com, a massive forum-driven website where the pseudo-militant grassroots conservatives can convene to pontificate at the virtual podium on the devious workings of government and media.

There is no noise on the Internet, but these ranters are screaming loudly enough to garner the reproach of more than easily offended liberals. The FReepers frequently use examples from current media to facilitate their arguments. Their practice of posting entire articles lifted from news sources all over the country has infuriated commercial media.

Crying theft, unfair competition and intellectual property rights, The Washington Post and The Los Angeles Times have filed suit against Free Republic.

What a delicious irony, that a group of enlightened and loquacious defenders of constitutional privilege are now entangled in this trenchant imbroglio calling into question the very principles their movement was founded upon.

The Free Republic calls their media adversaries "elements of the socialist propaganda machine" and claims that the practice of posting articles is tantamount to "gathering in our virtual town hall where we virtually pass around newspaper clippings."

The newspapers claim their copyrighted material is produced at great expense to them. They post these materials online, and the ad revenue from their websites is necessary to sustain their operation.

As both sides are armed with strong and persuasive rhetoric, the issue is exacerbated by the fact that Free Republic is a nonprofit movement. All of its funding comes from private donations. Therefore, there is soundness in the Freepers' assertion that they are not stealing the articles for commercial gain but rather passing them around to educate and illuminate each other on issues of immediate relevancy.

The district judge disagreed and ruled erroneously in favor of the Post and the Times, saying that Free Republic is a commercial enterprise. Free Republic is appealing to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and will likely have its arguments heard in September. In the meantime, the group is barred from allowing its members to post full-text articles from The Washington Post and The Los Angeles Times.

The FReepers are calling this legal fight no less than a "life-and-death struggle." In fact, this description is the truth. If this battle falls in favor of the commercial media, the Free Republic will die. With its principled dedication to the First Amendment called into question, the group is being forced to defend it absolutely. If it fails, then the fundamental foundation of the group's movement will have been destroyed. No structure can stand without a foundation.

The fight that Free Republic is embroiled in is broader and farther-reaching than just the relatively small group of people involved. The U.S. Constitution is the foundation upon which our democracy is built. Its first and foremost amendment is being challenged in the name of monetary gain.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals must recognize that to rule in favor of the commercial media in this case will weaken and debase the words supporting this country. Chipping away at the foundation doesn't bode well for any American: conservative, liberal, or purveyor of socialist propaganda.

Kate MacDonald (kmacdonald


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Free Republic; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hughhewitt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-198 next last
To: RonDog
Thanks RonDog
121 posted on 05/10/2002 2:41:57 PM PDT by Snow Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
BTTT
122 posted on 05/10/2002 3:00:56 PM PDT by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
A freeper running against Daschle? Where do I send the campaign contribution?
123 posted on 05/10/2002 3:48:30 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
The left would have two parties, Green and Democrat, and the right would have at least half a dozen.

Sounds like the European model to me. =^)

124 posted on 05/10/2002 5:09:51 PM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: ElRushbo
Bttt.

5.56mm

125 posted on 05/10/2002 5:13:35 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
That ignores the archiving function of FR to insure that the history of some of these things are preserved. If all you have are links, links go dead, then the discussion is much less valuable without the source material.
126 posted on 05/10/2002 5:40:02 PM PDT by StriperSniper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
You have FReepmail! ;-)
127 posted on 05/10/2002 5:50:01 PM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: RonDog; MeeknMing; DogGone
Thanks for the ping!

I agree with Dog Gone -- this needs to go the SCOTUS and let them rule and then let the Washington Post and LA Times get what they have coming to them. Count me in for a donation! Hope they are forced to not only pay legal bills but damages for bringing what I consider a frivolous lawsuit against FR!

128 posted on 05/10/2002 6:05:58 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

129 posted on 05/10/2002 6:18:16 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
...I will seek a way to file an amicus curia brief in the Supreme Court on behalf of FreeRepublic's position. There will be many interested parties who will support its viewpoint. (When that comes around, it will be either my 18th or 19th brief in that court. None have been more honorable than this one will be.)

You are the best! And I am so glad you are on our side.

130 posted on 05/10/2002 6:30:45 PM PDT by MonroeDNA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Thanks! That's cute! I love smilely faces especially ones that wink!
131 posted on 05/10/2002 6:51:53 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Thanks! As soon as I can find more of those, I'll add 'em to me collection!.....
132 posted on 05/10/2002 7:00:18 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
I smell SLAPP suit!!!
Hmmm... Could be.

SLAPP = "Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation"

From http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/dissent/documents/Beder_SLAPPS.html:

"...Every year thousands of people are sued in the USA for speaking out against governments and corporations. Multi-million dollar law suits are being filed against individual citizens and groups for circulating petitions, writing to public officials, speaking at, or even just attending, public meetings, organising boycotts and engaging in peaceful demonstrations.[2] These law suits have been labelled "Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation" or SLAPPs by University of Denver academics Penelope Canan and George Pring, who have been studying such suits for more than a decade with the help of funding from the US National Science Foundation...

...One trial judge pointed out:

The conceptual thread that binds [SLAPPs] is that they are suits without substantial merit that are brought by private interests to "stop citizens from exercising their political rights or to punish them for having done so"...The longer the litigation can be stretched out, the more litigation that can be churned, the greater the expense that is inflicted and the closer the SLAPP filer moves to success. The purpose of such gamesmanship ranges from simple retribution for past activism to discouraging future activism.[17]...

133 posted on 05/10/2002 7:01:26 PM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: RonDog;Bryan;Jim Robinson
The conceptual thread that binds [SLAPPs] is that they are suits without substantial merit that are brought by private interests to "stop citizens from exercising their political rights or to punish them for having done so"...

Actually, due to the selling of online newspaper archives to high school, university and public libraries, this may have crossed over into the realm of a "suit without substantial merit."

We all pay for these online archives through our tax dollars. You can access them online through a password system from your local library, or go to a local university or high school and access them there. I know that Newsbank has an "email this article option". They're not charging you to email the article, so can you email a single article all day long?

I know that I can access a number of these archives in a number of ways, and a majority of Netizens should be able to achieve similar access. (If the selling consortium attempts to control this access, they can be easily smacked down with the ADA)

The playing field may have changed. ;-)

134 posted on 05/10/2002 7:53:08 PM PDT by an amused spectator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator
In the meantime, the group is barred from allowing its members to post full-text articles from The Washington Post and The Los Angeles Times.

But the Los Angeles Slimes is A-OK with The Smirking Chimp posting full-text articles more than a year AFTER the "decision" by their pet judge. ;-)

As an update to my PREVIOUS documentation (on 12/3/01) of this fact, once again, for the record, MANY left-wing websites have been posting (and CONTINUE to post) full-text articles from the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post - apparently with the knowledge and consent of those corporations.

And this practice continues, as recently as TODAY. See, for instance, an Los Angeles Times article by John Balzar called "Out of Step, but With a Big Swagger" posted online in all of its copyrighted FULL TEXT glory at:

www.Smirkingchimp.com

135 posted on 05/10/2002 7:54:55 PM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: floriduh voter
FReep on! GO JEB!
136 posted on 05/10/2002 10:29:33 PM PDT by mafree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: RonDog; Jim Robinson; Congressman BillyBob
Wow, RonDog! Good work! : )

Post #135 FYI ping.

137 posted on 05/10/2002 10:29:48 PM PDT by American Preservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: ElRushbo
Great article, but FreeRepublic will not die!
I am amazed at how objective this article was however! This was written by a journalist?
138 posted on 05/10/2002 10:37:02 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElRushbo
Great find, ElRushbo!
139 posted on 05/10/2002 10:49:13 PM PDT by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: firebrand; StarFan; Dutchy; RaceBannon; Cacique; OneidaM; stanz; evilC; DoctorRaoul; BlackAgnes...
Free Republic bills itself as a "loosely organized group of grassroots Americans who support the constitution and look for honesty, integrity and honor from those in government." Nice PR. Really, this staunchly conservative activist group's popularity and fondness for a good battle have turned quite a few heads on Capitol Hill. Active members, who call themselves FReepers, include Dr. Alan Keyes, Gary Aldrich, Sean Hannity, Ann Coulter, Congressman Bob Barr and Matt Drudge. In its fifth year, the Free Republic has grown to over 60,000 members with chapters all over the country. The crux of their movement is Freerepublic.com, a massive forum-driven website where the pseudo-militant grassroots conservatives can convene to pontificate at the virtual podium on the devious workings of government and media.

Any thoughts on this article, fellow pseudo-militant conservatives???

140 posted on 05/10/2002 10:56:17 PM PDT by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-198 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson