Skip to comments.
I Want My M60 Back!
Freerepublic.com
| 4/9/2002
| Patton
Posted on 04/09/2002 8:03:39 PM PDT by patton
Ladies and Gentlemen,
I am annoyed. I humped/drug/carried an M-60 machine gun through the woods of North Carolina, Alaska, Panama, Georgia, and - well, you name it.
It weighed 23.6 pounds (a number ingrained in my anatomy), plus 7 pounds/hundred rounds of ammo.
I often went without food, in order to carry more ammo. So did my crew - we could live on short rations, but not short on ammo.
Why, exactly, am I less trustworthy as a civilian to fire this pig?
What have we lost, in the way of freedom, while I wasted my time defending it?
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2a; banglist; rtkaba; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-157 next last
To: patton
If ya need a fix, ya can always go to the
creek this weekend. Its always a fun time.
41
posted on
04/09/2002 9:05:52 PM PDT
by
FreeInWV
To: patton;DCBryan1
Well said.Yup!
Warning! not for minors or prudes.
http://www.skennerton.com/w_at_arms/Album1.html
To: patton
I understand now. 80 million gun owners plus one.
To: FreeInWV
"Machine Gun Rentals start at $20-$25 for 30 rounds depending upon which weapon and renter vender you choose. "
Now, I was a weapons instructor for years, and as such, got stuck with the "expired ammo- burn it up" detail. To the tune of 10,000 rds/day.
So I should pay more than 100,000 for a $50 gun, and about $1/round for ammo the army can't give away?
My time spent defending this country was wasted.
44
posted on
04/09/2002 9:15:15 PM PDT
by
patton
To: Shooter 2.5
Nasty response, that, and - in my humble opinion - completely unjustified. I vote Pro-Life first, Pro-2A second, without fail.
Thank you for playing.
45
posted on
04/09/2002 9:18:49 PM PDT
by
patton
To: DCBryan1
Pictures! We must have pictures! ;o)
46
posted on
04/09/2002 9:25:54 PM PDT
by
SW6906
To: StriperSniper
http://www.skennerton.com/w_at_arms/Album1.htmlHa Ha!
You can find a good looking woman anywhere, but a good looking gun is hard to find.
<./flame magnant>
47
posted on
04/09/2002 9:27:18 PM PDT
by
DCBryan1
To: patton; DCBryan1
"completely unjustified."
I hope it was unjustified but it sounds like you just woke up from a 30 year nap. People who don't belong to some gun organization seem to be like that. They live in their own little world until they decide they want to go out and buy a new toy and run right into gun laws that have been on the books for decades. Why are you any different from the liberals who, during the L.A. riots, found out about the three day waiting period?
So what gun organization do you belong to in order to change those laws? And please don't tell me that you sacrifice a half hour every four years out of your busy schedule to vote for someone.
To: Shooter 2.5
49
posted on
04/09/2002 9:41:15 PM PDT
by
patton
To: patton
Sorry, poaching of serfs and their belongings, and the means to do so, is striclty forbidden. You must be one of the king's men to hunt his lands.
But at least there's no limit once you get your badge, body armor, and agency t-shirt.
50
posted on
04/09/2002 9:41:53 PM PDT
by
Tauzero
To: patton
I posted on that thread. What's your point? Do you think that gun control is suddenly going to go away by some miracle? What gun organization do you belong to that will pressure the politicians to sunset the assault weapons bill in 2004?
Comment #52 Removed by Moderator
To: Shooter 2.5
I don't think that the NRA or anybody else will make this abuse go away - I intend to, as soon as the USSC ratifies Emerson - use the 1871 "Conspiracy to Deprive of Civil Rights Law" to haul a bunch of politicians into court.
Did you think the NRA would do such a thing?
53
posted on
04/09/2002 9:58:34 PM PDT
by
patton
To: Buck Turgidson
You're right, I forgot how bad it is there and getting worse. They obviously didn't get the memo that gun control is over. Bullet Tax, indeed! If Simon doesn't win, everything that's happening there, will happen in our states in a shorter period of time than we would like.
To: Shooter 2.5
By the way, I was first enrolled in the NRA in 1970, I think.
55
posted on
04/09/2002 10:03:47 PM PDT
by
patton
To: patton
So what you're saying is that you don't belong to any gun organization like the NRA, GOA, SAS, RKBA, JPFO or any State Associations. Do I believe that you would use your money to get a lawyer to sue the government? No, I do not.
To: Shooter 2.5
What would you like to bet? Name a dollar figure. Make it expensive.
57
posted on
04/09/2002 10:09:36 PM PDT
by
patton
To: Centurion2000
M-60 is a pig on three legs. The only weapon that can break while sitting in the armory. Myself I would take the 249 or a MG-34/42.
58
posted on
04/09/2002 10:18:46 PM PDT
by
junta
To: Woahhs
Fear the armed government that fears an armed citizen. Governments are not any more responsible with a firearm just because they are a government. We are a government of the people, so, if the people cannot be trusted, then the government cannot be trusted. I hope that logic doesn't confuse you.
To: patton
You're not even part of a group that helped with Emerson for a lousy 20 dollars a year so why should I believe you would use thousands of your money to take it further?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-157 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson