Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity: Bush Vs. Gore (and anyone else): There IS a difference; let's keep track of the PROOF!
March 14, 2002

Posted on 03/13/2002 11:19:34 PM PST by Timesink

As we've all noticed over the last couple of days, the President has made a few strategic decisions that have not gone over well with certain types. The disruptors, the fair-weather Republicans, the single-issue Buchananite nutbags, the capital-L Libertarians, the tinfoilers, the McCainiacs and the plain old Bush-haters; all of them have come out of the woodwork to shriek in multi-hundred-post threads about how horrible George W. Bush is, how they'll never vote for him and/or any Republican ever again, how he's just another {liberal/socialist/New World Order Daddy's Boy/insert insult here}, no different from if we'd just gone ahead and elected {insert name of individual complainer's favorite boogeyman here}, yadda yadda yadda.

Of course, this is complete crap. Ever since January 20, 2001, we've noted in at least a dozen threads per week how some action or decision by Bush was a clear conservative/Republican act that would never have happened if Gore or Nader were president, and using such threads to give the lie to just the sort of rants that such nuts have been repeating all over FR in the last couple of days. The problem is, we haven't been keeping track of these examples.

So that's what this thread is for. A place to note every decision - past, present and future - that President Bush makes that shows him to be precisely the leader we expected him to be when we elected him. If you remember one from the past, post a link to that thread. Whenever one happens in the future, link to this thread. Hopefully, after getting a good start, we can merge the results into a bump list or whatever sort of bump-list "topic" replacemant JohnRob is currently working on. And then we'll have a ton of ammunition at the ready the next time the naysayers try to hijack FR.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: electionpresident; fairweatherfriends; georgewbush; gop; president; republicanparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
I'll start:

Bush and Gore like night and day; Despite steering to center, they swerve on key issues

1 posted on 03/13/2002 11:19:34 PM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Bush Vs. Gore: There IS a difference

That you have to tell us that is indication of a serious problem.

2 posted on 03/13/2002 11:21:23 PM PST by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
That you have to tell us that is indication of a serious problem.

Well you are the road to recovery since you admit you have a problem.

3 posted on 03/13/2002 11:25:40 PM PST by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
President Bush on Judge Pickering: "...While tomorrow's vote is about one man, a much larger principle is also at stake...the quality of justice in America..."
4 posted on 03/13/2002 11:26:17 PM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
"The disruptors, the fair-weather Republicans, the single-issue Buchananite nutbags, the capital-L Libertarians, the tinfoilers, the McCainiacs and the plain old Bush-haters;"................and then again, maybe we're just Conservatives. Ever think of that?
5 posted on 03/13/2002 11:27:37 PM PST by brat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Principle by Faith, one hopes.
6 posted on 03/13/2002 11:31:58 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
I know people will never agree with everything he does, and that's normal, but I get a kick out of the people who say that all is lost, and that he's a one-termer, and that they will never vote on him again... because of one single issue.
I was proud to see him sworn in as Governor of Texas in 1995, proud to see him sworn in as President of the United States last year, and will look forward to seeing him sworn in again 3 years from now.
7 posted on 03/13/2002 11:34:46 PM PST by GOPyouth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Great post....I can imagine the following: its 2004 and a freeper posts the following----So what if GWB cut tax every year,unemployment is 3%, the size of government has been cut by 25%,regulations have been reduced, the war on terroism was been won,Saddamn is in a box, crime is down, Bork is on the Supreme Court, and the Reps. control both houses of Congress, I`m not voting for Bush cause he`s not a real conserative and he was not for killing illegal aliens
8 posted on 03/13/2002 11:50:55 PM PST by bybybill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
And then we'll have a ton of ammunition at the ready the next time the naysayers try to hijack FR.

i've been here two more years than you, #%@%#@%$#@%$#. in case you're too dull to notice, allow me to point out that it is in fact you, and your republican party ilk, who is (are) hijacking fr.

9 posted on 03/14/2002 12:10:34 AM PST by johnboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnboy
*snicker* Pulling rank occasionally works on someone who just signed up last week, perhaps, but not on someone who's been here a year and a half (and lurked far longer than that).

By the way, MurryMom's been a member for 5 1/2 months longer than you, johnboy. So if that's your measuring stick, then who's the True Freeper?

10 posted on 03/14/2002 12:17:39 AM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
george? george, is that you? don't you have to get up early tomorrow and s**k vincente's d**k?

i guess all of us "naysayers" are kind of suspending judgement unless and until you explain to us how importing 65 million democrat voters into this country benefits our sons and daughters.

still waiting.

still waiting.

is that silence i hear?

11 posted on 03/14/2002 12:18:42 AM PST by johnboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
By the way, MurryMom's been a member for 5 1/2 months longer than you, johnboy.

before then, i posted as "thomas payne." for, i dunno ... 5 1/2 months? and lurked for, i dunno, since it was a bbs? was it ever?

12 posted on 03/14/2002 12:21:22 AM PST by johnboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bybybill
... the size of government has been cut by 25%,regulations have been reduced, the war on terroism was been won,Saddamn is in a box, crime is down, Bork is on the Supreme Court, and the Reps. control both houses of Congress ...

man, i've been sleeping, the size of government has been reduced, and i didn't notice; regulations are vanishing before my eyes, and i'm too drug addled to notice; sadam who? (oh, yes, wasn't he something or other of iraq before dick cheney was appointed supreme leadero, or other?); pickering can't even get a fair hearing, but bork is on scotus? (give me a break); oh, and, i guess i must have misinterpreted this last election .. i thought that the dems controlled the senate; but now, thanks to you, i learn that the senate is safely in the hands of republicans, who will steadfastly resist the invasion of foriegns.

ugh.

I live in a fantasy world?!?

13 posted on 03/14/2002 12:26:37 AM PST by johnboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: johnboy
OK, you keep track of the things Bush does that Gore wouldn't. So far, on your side is the war (and, to give credit where it is due, he has done an excellent job here!). We also have the meager tax cut on your side, but I don't expect to ever see it. The bulk of it will occur after he is out of office.

But on the negative side, we have:

1. We have just survived the most criminal administration in history. Not one prosecution! Algore would have moved on, too.

2. Democrats came within a hair of stealing this last election. Not one prosecution! Because of his failure to prosecute, the despicable RATS will be emboldened. GWB will be the last Republican president in my lifetime. The era of legitimate elections is over; welcome to elections soviet style!

3. The farm bill. A complete disaster by any measure. Hard to picture Algore doing worse.

4. The education bill. Ditto.

5. The steel tariff. Ready to pay a lot more for everything? Would Algore have done anything different?

6. Amnesty for illegals. This worked sooo well last time. Here in CA, we are over run with illegals. The ultimate goal of these illegals is not to become Americans, but to create an "Hispanic homeland" .... (their words, not mine). Could Algore have done more damage than GWB in this regard?


I cold go on, but I hope you get the point. Outside of the war, GWB has behaved just like a RINO. Or maybe that is what the Republican party is these days, just Democrats light. Minus the overwhelming corruption, but no longer holding conservative principles dear.

14 posted on 03/14/2002 12:28:13 AM PST by studly hungwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: studly hungwell
studly think about it this guy has to do Rino things to save the damn party, every year the dems run on a few issues and are very very successful on them mainly cause of scare tactics only once in last 20 years have republicans won a more totality of seats on election day of course that being 94, now that Bush has taken just about every democratic issue off the table and allowed republicans to win on their ideas, James Carvilles memo even says so why do think social security is being brought up again?? Dems have to think up new things to attack the party on and they really don't have any of them they've been using the same issues and playbook since Goldwater in 64, I don't agree with everything George does but the man has brilliantly shaped the party to look more appealing to voting masses who would just write us off on election day when was the last time you had a soccer mom honestly say you know that Republican is such a nice man I kinda agree with him or some card carrying union guy say hey george and the republicans helped us alot more then Clinton and Gore ever did. So what is the democratic party reduced to? Social Issues.. abortion and gun control to keep their base intact I don't even include the enviroment cause when the auto industry talks as they did today on cafe standards Dems listen. Keep the Faith Jim Jeffords caused George to do this don't think thats why Tom Daschle aint sweatin a little on election night.
15 posted on 03/14/2002 1:57:34 AM PST by Leclair10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: studly hungwell
Well let me go on a bit more for you

Environmemtal scientists are commiting fraud at the interior dept. and GW has refused to prosecute them

He has increased federal spending 260 billion dollars in 2 years.

He wants to expand Americorp a hated program of conservatives and has tacked on his own freedom core.

He socialized airport security workers

He signed the terrorist bill that would have allowed the government to seize the assets of those tennessee tax protestors last year.

And don't forget he is about to sign that CFR bill.

What a great president. Gore may have been worse but I have a hard time believing it would have been more than marginally worse. I by the way am a capital L libertarian who did give GW the benefit of the doubt initially because of the couple good things he did do early on.

16 posted on 03/14/2002 2:13:14 AM PST by rudehost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bybybill
Great post....I can imagine the following: its 2004 and a freeper posts the following----So what if GWB cut tax every year,unemployment is 3%, the size of government has been cut by 25%,regulations have been reduced, the war on terroism was been won,Saddamn is in a box, crime is down, Bork is on the Supreme Court, and the Reps. control both houses of Congress, I`m not voting for Bush cause he`s not a real conserative and he was not for killing illegal aliens

Come now. See, this is what just drives people away from any serious dialogue. First, you get a diatribe from the original post which basically says ANYONE...ANYONE that disagrees with Bush is a nutcase. That's the first fallacy.
Then we get this list of basic untruths:

  1. the size of government has been cut by 25%. By that you mean "homeland defense" and the Education bill?
  2. cut tax every year. You mean that 40 billion dollar pittance?
  3. Bork is on the Supreme Court. What the freak?? He only just now came out in favor of Pickering at the end of the day when the guy is almost assured of dying in committee!
  4. Repubs control the house and senate. ??? HELLO! This is the same Bush that disappeared into obscurity when Schundler needed his support in NJ?
  5. the war on terroism was been won. So that would be accomplished by hamstringing the Israelis when they confront "global terror" in their backyard, right?

Come on guys! I voted for Bush, I'm thankful he's the Commander-in-Chief for THIS Air Force officer, but I'm not under any kind of illusion that this is some kind of hardcore "conservative revolution" happening in the White House. GW seems to me to be a kind man, a sincere man, and most likable, but that doesn't stop me from grieving over what I see are missteps in the direction of his Administration.

This kind of post just assumes lockstop, mindless allegiance...OR ELSE! Someone from FR will come and take my military ID away? My "true conservative" secret decoder ring will be confiscated? Have we come to the time when people are now all thrown out as Mcainiacs, nutcases and Buchananites who feel for good reason that while Bush is (primarily in terms of character) so much more qualified than Clinton, he is not nearly as principled as he could and should be??

Look, I still voted for Bush and I will gladly do so again as long as the choices remain status quo. I made my vote count in the right direction. Why am I now public enemy #1 because I DARE to ask, "what gives?" when I see Bush (pre 9/11) so gung ho on Mexico?

Of COURSE he has to be a political animal. Thinking people realize that, but you can't boil EVERYTHING he does that looks like he's going left but swearing he's going right as "strategery". You can't create a straw man of conservative critics of Bush as "one issue" disgruntled postal workers. I have MANY fellow military colleagues that feel the way I do. We are glad to have Bush as Commander and glad to have the support of the military in general, but not as happy with many other things. Like we are trained to do, we shrug our shoulders, sigh a hearty "Oh Well!", realize it could be much worse, and hope for a better day. Were we supposed to be in straightjackets instead of BDUs for being such "nutcases"?

17 posted on 03/14/2002 3:06:59 AM PST by CaptBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
The president is held back by the congress he's been dealt..and a public that has been anesthetized through eight years of Clinton. Considering this, President Bush is performing miracles.

Sure, the tax cut could have been larger...but that it IS at all is an extraordinary accomplishment.

Should the education policy include vouchers? Yes. And, with a Republican congress this can be added to the new performance measurements now part of the education system.

Is Bush providing blanket amnesty for illegals? NO.

Will Bush sign CFR? Probably. But, we just don't know yet.

But, what about the Kyoto Treaty? I remember the president being beaten about the head and neck not only here, but throughout the world. He threw this piece of trash in the garbage to protect the American economy. Let's give him some credit.

The president is also returning the value and sanctity of life to the American conscience. We're no longer paying for abortions throughout the world, the pre-born child now has rights to medical care, life cannot be created for research, and (again, with a Republican senate) this president will sign a bill banning partial birth abortion.

And, this nonsense about "not prosecuting the Clintons" is just that...nonsense. Like it or not, the plebs get one "shot" at taking out the "king". We had our chance. The House had the guts to impeach Clinton, the Senate had the guts to let him off without even pretending to hold a trial.

Yes, Clinton is a felon. Yes, Clinton is a fraud. Yes, Clinton is the worst man who ever was or will be president. Yes, he got away with it. Let it go.

And, let's not forget that while Bush is the leader, he must operate in a political environment that all too often resembles a swamp. If you really want to see what he's made of...get out there and work to give Bush a Republican congress.

18 posted on 03/14/2002 3:27:45 AM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Election President
Check the Bump List folders for articles related to and descriptions of the above topic(s) or for other topics of interest.
19 posted on 03/14/2002 5:23:54 AM PST by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rudehost
No President can please all the people all the time. I voted for Clinton in 1992 because I was upset by former Pres. Bush's attitude about the economy. I was a one issue person. I ignored the truth. No matter how former President Bush displeased me, he was a far better choice than Clinton. President Bush was and still is a better choice than Gore. "President Gore" would have completely botched the war on terrorism. He would have appointed liberal judges to the bench. He would have declared war on America's manufacturers such as GM. We would not have had a tax cut. I wised up after my disasterous vote in 1992, Now, I look at the big picture. I paid a huge price for my 1992 vote as did the country. I was forced to endure 8 years of President Clinton's policies which lead to 9-11.
20 posted on 03/14/2002 6:39:11 AM PST by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson