[RIGHT IN SEATTLE]

I met a couple of so called "Ladies?". They were out on the town one night, It was late, they were shooting their mouth's off!

It was my local place, hi-end, (not me),3 driveways from home.

After they filled my ear of their "Divorce" escapades----------I asked them, "Why is it that women divorce, and enjoy it so?"

""It's easy they said!""----------NO S#$T-I thought.

I had ordered 3 rounds for both of them and myself. Listening to their bashing on one problem or another.

I left, AND LEFT THEM WITH THE TAB.

The next day the bartender and I had a great look at the video of How "easy it was"

[HENRYADAMS]

Question: "Why Divorce is so prevalent?"

Answer: European society has dis-integrated. Demos has been in control for the last 220 years. The other two essential elements in our society e.g. the warriors and the priest as effective forces have gone away. Demos philosophy is based upon eating, drinking, copulating and snoring. Since those who are able have gone away Demos has been on a 220 year romp. It has been busy fullfilling the aforementioned desires.Very destructive isn't it? When the inevitable chaos ensues the "Teacher" will come. Demos will be whipped back into its appropriate role-producing. Its betters will run things again. Rank will be restored and our social ills will be reduced.

[Z-28]

Lawyers are the #1 cause of divorce.

There's a .97 correlation coefficient between the number of lawyers in the U.S. and the number of divorces. There's now 1 lawyer for every 96 people in the U.S. There are more lawyer ads in the San Diego phone book yellow pages than any other category, even restaurants.

[Age of Reason]

Marriage is not a contract between two people.

Marriage is more a contract between a couple and their society.

When you think about reasons for divorce, think about society as much as the couple.

[AgThorn]

There are no winners in Divorce ... and children are the big loosers. The only motivation for divorce is selfishness.

[wwjdn]

Good post. I have five children and I can tell you that by my experiences children need mothers and fathers equally to be balanced. If they can't have both, then my suggestion should be mothers from birth to age 10, and fathers from age 10-21.

Mothers are excellent nurturers and fathers are great at preparing the child for independance. This is not to say that either is more important, that is what the judges and lawyers have been doing to American families for 30 years now. Currently the father has the right to shut up pay money (far more than he should have to pay) and see his child once a year.

Our system is so corrupt that since my divorce, if my ex-wife gets a big raise, my child-support would go up. How can that be considered fair by anyones imagination?

The ultimate is a good, healthy, moral man and woman marriage where the children learn by example (seeing a good moral relationship work the way it was designed by God).

[Longshanks]

Modern Western men have been made effenimate by media/education establishment brainwashing. Therefore they is no longer attractive to women for the long term. Likewise, Western women have become masculinized and are less attractive to men.

That is why native western populations can no longer reproduce their numbers. It's difficult for American overgrown teenagers to overcome a lifetime of brainwashing to become a genuine man. However, those who can will have no trouble getting and keeping a woman.