Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Suspect accused of vandalizing Confederate flag in Mizzou dorm
STL Today ^ | 11/21/2001 11:19 AM | ap

Posted on 11/21/2001 11:54:19 AM PST by shuckmaster

Edited on 05/11/2004 5:33:22 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

COLUMBIA, Mo. (AP) -- Police at the University of Missouri have arrested a student suspected of destroying a Confederate flag in a dorm room.

Dave Sierpina, 18, of Aurora, Ill., was arrested on suspicion of second-degree burglary and property damage.


(Excerpt) Read more at stltoday.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dixielist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 341-351 next last
To: #3Fan
are you as dim as your posts indicate? all you are doing is mouthing the same old tired,foolish, ignorant, arrogant anti-southron drivel of the nothern revisionists of liberal academia. if things were as simple as you suggest, there would have been no war. the damnedyankees cared NOTHING about the slaves- NOTHING! lincoln himself said that indians & blacks were NOT HUMAN. his opinion was shared by at least 99% of northern whites.

once again, things are simple ONLY to the SIMPLE.

as i have said before, you really should read something besides propaganda.

201 posted on 12/04/2001 9:05:01 AM PST by stand watie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: #3Fan
1. there were more slaves in the north in 1865 because the damnyankees were holding more slaves! no other reason.

2. Ben "the BEAST" Butler selling slaves for the good of the damnyankee high command & himself illustrates nothing except that he & and all the others of the yankee high command were interested in nothing but $$$$$$$ & POWER.

the WBTS was, once again, about the arrogant, hatefilled damnyankees lust to CONTROL/DOMINATE the south politically & economically, while continuing to do whatever was in THEIR personal interest. every other excuse was just eyewash to fool the credulous & stupid.

202 posted on 12/04/2001 9:12:46 AM PST by stand watie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: CWRWinger
In the case of Clinton, you must admit, the South didn't go for that scalawag.

Didn't go for him? They made him governer for umpteen years.

Nor does this piece of human refuse even live in the South.

Thanks a lot. Raise 'em wrong and send them up here.

203 posted on 12/04/2001 1:23:02 PM PST by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: stand watie
are you as dim as your posts indicate? all you are doing is mouthing the same old tired,foolish, ignorant, arrogant anti-southron drivel of the nothern revisionists of liberal academia.

The ultimate revisionism is to say that slavery had nothing to do with secession when South Carolina's Declaration of Secession says slavery was the driving force.

...if things were as simple as you suggest, there would have been no war. the damnedyankees cared NOTHING about the slaves- NOTHING!

Lincoln and the Radical Republicans cared about slavery, the rest wanted to preserve the union.

lincoln himself said that indians & blacks were NOT HUMAN. his opinion was shared by at least 99% of northern whites.

But he did issue the EP. Truths are stubborn things aren't they?

once again, things are simple ONLY to the SIMPLE.

The South seceded for slavery, the North fought to preserve the union. I've never said any different.

as i have said before, you really should read something besides propaganda.

I have. I've read South Carolina's Declaration of Secession. The South's own words and they say slavery was the reason.

204 posted on 12/04/2001 1:29:39 PM PST by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: stand watie
lincoln himself said that indians & blacks were NOT HUMAN. his opinion was shared by at least 99% of northern whites.

And 100% of the southern ones?

I know it's pointless but I don't suppose you can provide a source for that Lincoln quote?

205 posted on 12/04/2001 1:34:38 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: stand watie
1. there were more slaves in the north in 1865 because the damnyankees were holding more slaves! no other reason.

The number went from 10 to 12. LOL

2. Ben "the BEAST" Butler selling slaves for the good of the damnyankee high command & himself illustrates nothing except that he & and all the others of the yankee high command were interested in nothing but $$$$$$$ & POWER.

The North was significantly reducing their percentage of the population that were slaves since 1800. Lincoln and the Radical Republicans cared about slavery, that's all it took.

the WBTS was, once again, about the arrogant, hatefilled damnyankees lust to CONTROL/DOMINATE the south politically & economically, while continuing to do whatever was in THEIR personal interest.

The Civil War was about preservation of the union, the abolition of slavery being a fringe benefit.

every other excuse was just eyewash to fool the credulous & stupid.

So you've never read South Carolina's Declarationn of Secession? If you would read it, you would read the South's own words that say they seceded mainly to preserve slavery. Truths are stubborn things that just won't go away, will they?

206 posted on 12/04/2001 1:37:18 PM PST by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
I know it's pointless but I don't suppose you can provide a source for that Lincoln quote?

Now you know that you're going to have to pay him $60 for that source, don't you? :^)

207 posted on 12/04/2001 1:38:51 PM PST by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: #3Fan
Pay him???? Pay him for what? The crap he puts out? Stande Watie wouldn't know the truth if it bit him on his Jefferson Davis.
208 posted on 12/04/2001 1:40:49 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: shuckmaster
I thought multiculturalism prevented these hate crimes? (sarcasm) Fly the PLO symbol and they'll cheer. Scary how so-called thinking people are easily manipulated by the liberal P.C. crowd. I wonder how many of the students could identify Lincoln, Jeff Davis, Lee, Grant and the century in which the war was fought! Asking dates would be unfair.
209 posted on 12/04/2001 1:42:01 PM PST by ChiMark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Pay him???? Pay him for what? The crap he puts out? Stande Watie wouldn't know the truth if it bit him on his Jefferson Davis.

LOL He, like most of the others, can't handle the truth. They want to believe this fantasy that the South was some kind of utopia that got ruined by the North. They put out this image that the slaveowners and their slaves all sat around on the porches after the day's business to have a good time and live in harmony and happiness, the slaves being perfectly happy to make their owners rich, the slaveowners being fully appreciative of their slaves work and treating them with the utmost respect because of it. Yeah right.

210 posted on 12/04/2001 1:48:48 PM PST by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: #3Fan
yep, lincoln the racist/hater/despot/war criminal did issue the emancipation proclamation & for just one reason: TO INJURE THE SOUTH'S WAR EFFORT.

he openly said that HE cared nothing for the plight of slaves; neither did the so-called radical republicans, to which he belonged.

FUNNY THING though, he freed not a single slave in the NORTH. wonder why not, if you are correct about lincoln?

he and klintoon are brothers in the spirit, separated by >100 years.

211 posted on 12/05/2001 9:25:36 AM PST by stand watie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: #3Fan
i think i told you what MOST HISTORIANS think of the sucession documents from EVERY state: UNREAD,IRREVELANT & NOT OF IMPORT to the citizens of the 13 states. the war was about FREEDOM from the NORTH.

sorry, thast old chestnut of the liberal revisionists is BUNKEM.

212 posted on 12/05/2001 9:28:50 AM PST by stand watie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: #3Fan
try reading LINCOLN & THE SECRET SIX, from the NY Times publishing house.
213 posted on 12/05/2001 9:29:51 AM PST by stand watie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: #3Fan
i ask you again, are you as MINDLESS as your posts indicate

the southland or the north were NEVER utopias. NONETHELESS, the status of free blacks, latinos,jews,asians and (MY people) the american indian was un-argueably better in the CSA!

214 posted on 12/05/2001 9:32:57 AM PST by stand watie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: stand watie
yep, lincoln the racist/hater/despot/war criminal did issue the emancipation proclamation & for just one reason: TO INJURE THE SOUTH'S WAR EFFORT.

If Lincoln didn't care about slavery, why did South Carolina's Declaration of Secession say he was hostile to it? Were they lying?

he openly said that HE cared nothing for the plight of slaves; neither did the so-called radical republicans, to which he belonged.

If that were true why did South Carolina's Declaration of Secession say he did? Were they lying?

FUNNY THING though, he freed not a single slave in the NORTH. wonder why not, if you are correct about lincoln?

Because the Northern states were smart enough not to rebel for dumb causes like the Southern states were.

he and klintoon are brothers in the spirit, separated by >100 years.

Nah, the Southerners were the Democrats.

215 posted on 12/05/2001 2:03:32 PM PST by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: stand watie
i think i told you what MOST HISTORIANS...

Most Southern biased historians.

...think of the sucession documents from EVERY state: UNREAD,IRREVELANT & NOT OF IMPORT to the citizens of the 13 states. the war was about FREEDOM from the NORTH.

If they were lying about something as important as rebellion, then they deserved to lose and live in squalor for 100+ years. Would you say the Declaration of Independence in unimportant also?

sorry, thast old chestnut of the liberal revisionists is BUNKEM.

Saying that slavery wasn't a reason for secession is the ultimate revisionism since South Ccrolina's Declaration of Secession plainly say it was the main reason.

216 posted on 12/05/2001 2:08:11 PM PST by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: stand watie
try reading LINCOLN & THE SECRET SIX, from the NY Times publishing house.

I don't read one man's opinion for long periods of time. That's the way people get misled.

217 posted on 12/05/2001 2:09:21 PM PST by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: stand watie
i ask you again, are you as MINDLESS as your posts indicate

I can read though, and I can see that South Carolina's Declaration of Secession says Lincoln was hostile to slavery and that was the main reason for secession.

the southland or the north were NEVER utopias. NONETHELESS, the status of free blacks, latinos,jews,asians and (MY people) the american indian was un-argueably better in the CSA!

Why did they risk death to escape to the North then?

Speaking of Stand Watie, why don't you give him the dignity of capitalizing his name. I'm sure that when many people see your handle, they have no way of knowing he was an Indian leader. If you capitalized it, that would give a better representation, wouldn't it?

218 posted on 12/05/2001 2:14:01 PM PST by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: #3Fan
i INTENTIONALLY do NOT capitolize our HERO-MARTYR's name, because neither i nor any other living man am WORTHY to use the Generals name capitialized.

among our people, such usage of the name of one of the tribe's HERO-MARTYRS is accepted, as a rememberence of/memorial to the dead.

for dixie,sw

219 posted on 12/06/2001 9:46:59 AM PST by stand watie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: #3Fan
FREE blacks DID NOT escape to the north (MANY free blacks WERE also SLAVEOWNERS! the damnyankees didn't tell you that in school did they?). and FEW slaves did escape-over 120 years the estimates are <20K, this from the author of RED OVER BLACK.

you really should READ my posts more carefully, as it is difficult to respond intelligently to BUNKEM!

220 posted on 12/06/2001 9:52:26 AM PST by stand watie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 341-351 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson