Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tolkien's Impact in Literature and Life
Crosswalk.com ^ | November 2001 | Patrick W. Curles

Posted on 11/19/2001 2:41:15 PM PST by A Mississippian

Crosswalk.com Entertainment Channel
|



Tolkien's Impact in Literature and Life

By Patrick W. Curles
PCANews
Tolkien saw himself as a hobbit in every way but in stature.


Crosswalk.com News Channel - A popular British magazine recently surveyed its readers to get their opinions about the best book of all time. Thousands responded. The landslide winner for the top spot in history: The Lord of the Rings, by J. R. R. Tolkien.

The literary elites were incensed and amazed. How could a fantasy writer win? They re-polled the country, and again Tolkien’s work blew away the competition. Again they asked the public, and for a third straight time the public was very clear, Tolkien was their favorite. I, for one, couldn’t agree more with this assessment.

J. R. R. Tolkien was born in South Africa in 1892. His father died shortly after his younger brother was born, so his mother was forced to raise the both of them by herself. To complicate matters, Tolkien’s mother converted to the Roman Catholic Church and was thereupon banished from much of her family and their support. A few years later his mother also died, leaving the boys to be raised by her parish priest.

Tolkien proceeded through school in a fairly unremarkable way except for his unusual giftedness in languages not just in speaking them, but understanding how they worked. Some children make up their own words - Tolkien made up his own languages. He pursued this love of words through studies at Oxford and later returned to teach philology there. He remains one of Oxford’s most celebrated professors. Through his study of languages he became exposed to the mythologies of the world. He wrote The Lord of the Rings, he later said, to give England her own myth.

The setting for this myth is Middle Earth, a land Tolkien first described to the world in The Hobbit, a work he first wrote for his children. The story is about Bilbo Baggins, an unassuming hobbit that gets swept into an adventure (much to his chagrin) with thirteen dwarves and a wizard. (Hobbits are man-like creatures about half the size of a normal human. They live in holes, usually; they love to eat, garden, and give gifts. Most of all, they love to stay home.) Along the way Bilbo becomes the owner of a magic ring that became the center of Tolkien’s masterpiece. The Lord of the Rings is an epic tale about the ring and how it fits into history.

Tolkien’s work has impacted me like no other author. Though many people recognize the quality and contributions of Tolkien’s work to the world, there are a few things, in particular, about his life and work that have import for me.

One is Tolkien’s view of myth. Though most people see a myth as a story of something untrue, Tolkien saw myth as the exact opposite. His great friend C. S. Lewis once objected to Tolkien that, “...myths are lies, though lies breathed through silver.” “No,” said Tolkien, “they are not.”

There are truths, Tolkien said, that are beyond us, transcendent truths, about beauty, truth, honor, etc. There are truths that man knows exist, but they cannot be seen - they are immaterial, but no less real, to us. It is only through the language of myth that we can speak of these truths. We have come from God, Tolkien said, and only through myth, through story telling, can we aspire to the life we were made for with God. To write and/or read myth, Tolkien believed, was to meditate on the most important truths of life.

Tolkien believed that what he wrote in The Lord of the Rings was true, not in the sense that the events really happened, but in the sense that they portrayed truth to us in a way that everyday events could not. After reading a bit of his work a friend asked him how the story would end. Tolkien responded, “I don’t know. I shall try to find out.” He felt that he was uncovering the truth already there, only hidden.

It was Tolkien’s view of myth that that most aided C. S. Lewis in his pilgrimage to accept Christianity. All the other myths of the world, Tolkien said, are a mixture of truth and error - truth because they are written by those made by and for God - error because written by those alienated by God. But the Bible is the one true myth. It is a true accounting of truth, while everything else we do is mimicking. This perspective was decisive in Lewis’ conversion to Christianity.
The second notable thing for me is Tolkien’s value of friendship. It is a notable characteristic of his work and his life. In the LOTR, this is seen most notably in the friendships of Frodo and Sam and Frodo and Aragorn. In his life, this is seen in his friendship with C. S. Lewis. Friendships are gifts, not so much made, but given to us. Friendship occurs when two people meet who share a common perspective, experience, insight, treasure, or burden. There is a bond that occurs that brings them beyond mere acquaintances to friends. And that friendship should be cherished.

Tolkien and Lewis certainly did cherish theirs. They were together at least three times per week: on Tuesday mornings and Thursday evenings with the other “Inklings” (a literary circle of friends), and at least one other day for lunch. Tolkien wrote, “Friendship with Lewis compensates for much, and besides giving constant pleasure and comfort has done me much good from the contact with a man at once honest, brave, intellectual - a scholar, a poet, and a philosopher - and a lover, at least after a long pilgrimage, of Our Lord.” Tolkien saw that the value of friends was not just that they stand with you, but that they stand with you and see the same things as you.

Third, Tolkien’s values, again in life and in work, encourage me. Tolkien saw himself as a hobbit in every way but in stature. He loved to eat (hobbits prefer six meals a day). He loved gardening, trees and long walks in the country. He loved pipes, stories and friends. He loved his family and preferred being at home to travel. He was jovial, kindhearted and generous. He was a devout Roman Catholic. He didn’t set out to change the world, he set out to live the life he had been given in obedience to God.

Like Lewis, Tolkien believed that home, family, and our labors were the heart of our lives. And for him labor included all his work, not just that he was paid for. He normally ate all three meals and had tea at home with his family. He rarely traveled, but ate and smoked a lot. For him, home, family, and labor were godly things that pleased God more than any “good work” could.

The LOTR ends in a hobbit’s home. Some have thought the ending anticlimactic given the grand scope of the epic. But this merely highlights that, for Tolkien, all the wars, heroism, and great acts of bravery are not nearly so valuable and praiseworthy as what goes on in the simple day-to-day events of our lives. We fight exciting wars so that we can lead boring lives.

Lastly, Tolkien’s life was dominated by his vision of the future - not a vision of what he would do for God, but what God would do for him. His mind was occupied with, what Calvin called, a “meditation on the afterlife.” He was fully aware and confident that “this light, momentary affliction is preparing us for an eternal weight of glory beyond all comparison.”

Like Lewis, he felt that the fact that we long for something more is proof to us that there is something more for us. He wrote to a friend: “We were born in a dark age out of due time for us. But there is this comfort: otherwise we should not know, or so much love, what we do love. I imagine the fish out of water is the only fish to have an inkling of water.” Christians are fish out of water, living outside their environment. We are pilgrims, aliens, exiles, who soon will go home.

In December the first of three Lord of the Rings movies will be released. The other two will be released the next two Decembers. Why mention this now? Well, if you haven’t read it, now you have time to do so before the movie is released. As for me, I’ll be standing in line in August.

The Rev. Patrick W. Curles is Assistant Pastor of Trinity PCA in Montgomery, Ala.

Copyright PCA News. Reprinted with permission.







TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: literature; tolkien
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
To: 68 grunt
The Fellowship of the Ring December 19, 2001

The Two Towers December 2002

The Return of the King December 2003

Ralph Bashki loves Tolkien's works but was himself somewhat disappointed with his attempt. Because it wasn't a commercial success, he sadly didn't have the funding to make the second half.

41 posted on 11/20/2001 6:42:44 AM PST by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: A Mississippian
LOTR is the best of the best.

It's too bad some people resist reading it simply because it's in the "fantasy" genre. Of course it completely transcends that genre and stands tall as one of the greatest works in the history of English literature.

Anyone who hasn't read the LOTR trilogy is missing out on a magnificent literary experience.

42 posted on 11/20/2001 6:46:12 AM PST by sargon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
I found a website some time ago from a fan who was very, very unhappy about Bakshi's attempt. The review is so hilarious I thought I'd share. Bakshi Critique.

A sample of the work:
Though hardly a Tolkien purist, I'm nonetheless constantly irked by the introduction's claim that "the Dark Lord learned the craft of Ring-making" after the Elves had made all the other Rings; but that is not my major gripe about Sauron. Rather, it is the way they make Sauron look. They show the Enemy only as a silhouette, but the silhouette is clear: human, tall, black-robed, and wearing a big helmet with foot-long horns on the top. I mean, he looks like one of the Knights Who Say "Ni", for God's sake. Perhaps the Fellowship of the Ring should have just brought him a shrubbery?

43 posted on 11/20/2001 6:46:55 AM PST by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: A Mississippian
Wonderful article, bump
44 posted on 11/20/2001 6:49:58 AM PST by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Mississippian
Seeing the film trailer this weekend only reinforced my already considerable desire to see this film. This is one movie that I would actually be willing to stand in line to see.
45 posted on 11/20/2001 6:52:47 AM PST by austinTparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eowyn-of-Rohan; Samwise; SauronOfMordor; Tom Bombadil; Victoria Delsoul


46 posted on 11/20/2001 6:54:17 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
Thanks, Brother, most appreciated!
47 posted on 11/20/2001 6:56:23 AM PST by 68 grunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: A Mississippian
I'm with you AM. What a lovely article...not one negative comment, unusual.

I won't be standing in line on Dec. 19th but soon after my adult daughter and I will be going to see this.

I have read the book, The Inklings, and it is very enjoyable. Learn lots about Tolkien and C.S. Lewis.

48 posted on 11/20/2001 6:57:45 AM PST by blackbart1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Mississippian
He loved gardening, trees and long walks in the country. He loved pipes, stories and friends. He loved his family and preferred being at home to travel. He was jovial, kindhearted and generous. He was a devout Roman Catholic. He didn’t set out to change the world, he set out to live the life he had been given in obedience to God.

Compare the personal lives of Tolkien and Lewis to the personal lives of other diverse modern authors/ Intellectuals like Rand, Satre, Ibsen and Brecht.

Then compare their artistic works.

Coincidence?

A good man out of the good treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is good; and an evil man out of the evil treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is evil: for of the abundance of the heart his mouth speaketh. -Luke 6:44-46

I think not.

49 posted on 11/20/2001 6:57:46 AM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
I've read them all and will see all the movies, so there...heh heh
50 posted on 11/20/2001 6:59:53 AM PST by blackbart1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FairWitness
"We fight exciting wars so that we can lead boring lives."

Hmmm... I disagree.

When you realize that every moment, thought and decision is important to God, even the most seemingly mundane tasks can become "exciting." We are in a spiritual battle for all the marbles.

To believe that any aspect of our lives is absolutely and ultimately "mundane" is to grant an important victory to the devil.

51 posted on 11/20/2001 7:03:20 AM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: sargon
It's too bad some people resist reading it simply because it's in the "fantasy" genre.

I ignored it until now for that very reason. In seventh grade I read the first page of the Hobbit where Bilbo (?) opened the door to his house at the base of a tree and I bailed. 8-)

Anyway, with the upcoming release of the movie and with all of the praise I've read here, I decided to give it another try.

I'm 120 pages in and I'm very pleased so far.

52 posted on 11/20/2001 7:09:19 AM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
I can't read this $hit. It's pablum for babies.

Sorry... go out in the woods and take a topo map.

Find an old town that has blown away and spend some time there.

Dirt and sweat, graves and foundations.

History beats fiction every time. Go look it up, if you have the time.

53 posted on 11/20/2001 7:50:14 AM PST by johnny7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
Yeah, I guess thoughtful writing that allows reflection upon the human experience and insight into the subtle distinctions between good and evil is pablum for babies. Thanks for pointing that out!
54 posted on 11/20/2001 7:58:19 AM PST by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: A Mississippian
Can't wait for the movie either. Great post. Thank you. BUMP
55 posted on 11/20/2001 8:01:34 AM PST by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JenB
"Wheel of Time? Wheel of Time? You're comparing the World's First Fantasy Soap Opera, complete with seven thousand major characters, all with their own mental problems, to Tolkien? Sheesh..."
LOL, I guess that may be the reason I like it so much. In the LOTR and The Hobbit, I always seemed detached from the characters. In the WOT, I really like the "soap opera, complete with seven thousand characters, all with mental problems." :-)
"Seriously, don't let me get started on Jordan. I have been known to stand and argue about Wheel of Time for three hours straight. However, I have also read all the books as soon as they come out. Why? Uh, because Perrin is cool?
If you like to argue for three hours over the WOT, you'll get no arguement from me. :-) Perrin, not Mat? LOL Perrin is my least favorite of the three.
56 posted on 11/20/2001 8:15:00 AM PST by Moridin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
"Like Lewis, he felt that the fact that we long for something more is proof to us that there is something more for us. He wrote to a friend: “We were born in a dark age out of due time for us. But there is this comfort: otherwise we should not know, or so much love, what we do love. I imagine the fish out of water is the only fish to have an inkling of water.” Christians are fish out of water, living outside their environment. We are pilgrims, aliens, exiles, who soon will go home." In a smaller sense, we have to experience the evils such as Clinton to appreciate the good, i.e. GWB.
57 posted on 11/20/2001 8:15:27 AM PST by klgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Moridin
"Have you read The Wheel of Time series by Robert Jordan? It's an unfinished series--book 10 should be out next fall. Personally, I like it better than the LOTR."

I've read all the books so far. Frankly, I think the whole series could have been finished up in four books, instead of...what are we on now, the eighth? If his characters were a little less screwed up. I get very frustrated with them. His story line is very original, though, which is why I read them.

IMO, Raymond E. Feist and R.A. Salvatore are much better.

The father of the genre, J.R.R. Tolkein, is in a class all by himself. He is the master.

Hmmm, since I just finished rereading LOTR not long ago, maybe I'll reread "Farmer Giles of Ham".

58 posted on 11/20/2001 8:16:42 AM PST by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
My previous post will be my last about the WOT -- I don't want to further "taint" this thread. :-)
59 posted on 11/20/2001 8:17:49 AM PST by Moridin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: A Mississippian
Oh sure, everyone likes the dorky little Hobbits. From my perspective he only told 1/2 of the story, ha ha ha.

Looking forward to the battle in the mines of Moria. Too bad about Bombadil.

60 posted on 11/20/2001 8:19:21 AM PST by Gothmog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson