Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Aviation Bill to Federalize Workers
Excite ^ | AP

Posted on 11/16/2001 1:17:08 PM PST by freedomcrusader

Aviation Bill to Federalize Workers

Updated: Thu, Nov 15 11:54 AM EST

By JIM ABRAMS, Associated Press Writer WASHINGTON (AP) - House and Senate negotiators reached a tentative agreement Thursday on legislation aimed at making the nation's airports and airplanes more secure. All airport screeners would become federal employees within two years.

"I think we have an agreement," the House Transportation Committee chairman, Rep. Don Young, R-Alaska, said after an hourlong meeting of five negotiators from each chamber.

Young and other lawmakers declined to discuss specifics, but aides, speaking on background, said the negotiators had agreed to a phased-in system under which all airport baggage screeners would become federal workers.

Under the tentative deal, the government would take immediate responsibility for the oversight of screeners. Within two years all screeners would become employees of the federal government. However, individual airports that meet strict federal standards could opt out of the system and use local law enforcement officials or private security firms for screening functions.

The negotiators also agreed that passengers would pay a fee of $2.50 every time they get on a plane to finance increased security measures. There would be a maximum $5 charge per trip.

The House and Senate negotiators had been stuck for several weeks on the issue of screeners. The bill passed by the Senate would create a new federal work force of 28,000 screeners. The House bill would put screeners under the supervision of the federal government but left it to the administration to decide whether screeners would become civil servants or remain employees of private security firms.

With the holiday season approaching and Americans still shying away from flying because of post-Sept. 11 security concerns, President Bush on Tuesday urged Congress to work day and night to give him an aviation security bill.

"I plead with the conferees to quickly reach agreement," said Sen. Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn., at a hearing of his Governmental Affairs Committee,where transportation officials outlined continuing security problems at airports since Sept. 11. "It will be truly outrageous if Congress leaves for Thanksgiving without passing aviation security legislation."

The two bills agree on most points, such as fortifying cockpit doors, increasing air marshals on flights and moving toward screening of all check-in bags. Differences remain on whether aviation security should be under the jurisdiction of the Justice Department or Transportation Department and on language in the House bill giving liability protection to building owners and others affected by the attacks on the World Trade Center.

But there was a consensus that the other parts would fall into place once the screener issue was settled. "The climate is there," said Sen. John Breaux, D-La., one of the negotiators.

Transportation Department Inspector General Kenneth Mead told the Senate Governmental Affairs hearing that numerous measures had been taken since Sept. 11 to bolster security. He cited reinforced cockpit doors, use of law enforcement officials and National Guard at airport checkpoints, background checks of airport personnel, use of FBI watch lists to identify suspicious passengers, and allowing only ticketed passengers beyond screening points.

But he said there were "still alarming lapses of security" and that steps taken would remain patchwork until Congress moves to enact fundamental changes.

Fewer than 10 percent of checked bags at the nation's airports are inspected for bombs and one overworked detection machine operator was found falling asleep on the job, Mead said.

He said that even those airports that have the $1 million machines often use them only sporadically. A survey by his office over the past weekend of 30 machines at nine airports found that 73 percent were not in continuous use.

Mead said checks over the past several weeks found some 90 security problems, including screeners missing dangerous items such as knives in carryon bags and airlines not carrying out random checks of passengers.

One of the big problems, those at the hearing said, was a lack of consistency. "You know something is wrong when screeners are confiscating thousands of nail clippers but allowing people with arsenals of weapons through," said Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill.

---

The House bill is H.R. 3150

The Senate bill is S. 1447.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: freedomcrusader
Just great. Airport "security" from the same people who brought us the 34-cent stamp. The whimpy Republicans in congress once again demonstrate they are masters of the "cave-in." After this latest capitulation, one is left with the impression that the Republican leadership thinks its role in life is to act as the "bi-partisan" rubber-stamp for Democratic party legislation.

Did the gutless wonder from Mississippi, Sen. Trent "Caves Alott," bother to ask himself how many more union employees this government boondoggle is going to create -- all of them yearning to vote Democrat in every election?

I rank Sen. Lott's strength-of-character right up there with tippler Teddy Kennedy's, the only difference being Lott's better driving record with female passengers.

41 posted on 11/16/2001 1:17:45 PM PST by Un-PC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #42 Removed by Moderator

To: freedomcrusader
The GOP has morphed into a self serving parody of the Democrats.

It is spending money like crazy, not offsetting the new necessary spending on national defense with cuts in the very bureaucracies it once promised to eliminate, like the Dept. of Educaion, and now it is going to vote to federalize a new bureaucracy.

The GOP constitutionalists and conservatives once supported is dead.

43 posted on 11/16/2001 1:17:47 PM PST by Jesse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomcrusader
No way. This is a ploy to get more feds who will vote Democrats to keep their jobs.
44 posted on 11/16/2001 1:17:47 PM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SentryoverAmerica
You are right on target about this.

I think it's time the parties picked a new logo and ditched the donkey and elephant. My suggestion? Janus...


45 posted on 11/16/2001 1:17:53 PM PST by zeugma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: freedomcrusader
WHAT IN THE HELL!! Have these political pricks ever waited at the DMV, a Social Security office, or any other state office? It seems to me that federal employee's are the worst employee's because their jobs can not be taken away so there is no initiative to work hard.
46 posted on 11/16/2001 1:17:56 PM PST by illbenice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomcrusader
Does the $2.50 get added even before the Fed's do anything ? Is this a tax in disguise ?
47 posted on 11/16/2001 1:17:56 PM PST by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomcrusader
Great. Federal Workers. That will solve the problems. Rrrrighttt!

From now on when it comes to firing the sluggardly, incompetent, time-wasting, break-stretching, surly, and otherwise nincompooply workers - you won't just be able to march up to the offending boob and say "You're Fired, get your stuff and leave,... NOW!"

Instead, you'll have to minutely document the alleged infractions (date, time, cirumstances, previous supervisory actions, previous required counseling given, etc.) and then establish a "re-training plan" that stretches out to a year or so that permits the worthless slug to "rehabilitate" him/herself. During that time, he/she has plenty of time to call in the sexual harassment or EEOC police and the Union on you and management to break the chain so he/she can continue on merrily in his/her slovenly ways unobstructed. Or, he/she can perform minimally enough to pass and then start the long chain all over again. And he/she does all this in the same job all the while, of course.

That's the way it happens in real life, folks.

Goodbye, major airlines. Consider yourself the new equivilant of the Post Office or Motor Vehicle Office. You won't get many willing customers in that climate. Somebody smarter will figure a way around this newly constipated system and leave you in permanent bankruptcy, just like the railroads.

(Note to self: Dump major airline stocks, NOW!)

48 posted on 11/16/2001 1:17:57 PM PST by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomcrusader
I had an opportunity to watch this bill's conference committee in action on C-SPAN a couple nights ago. The thing that was immediately obvious to me was that the Republican House members taking the side of privatization were intimidated by the Rat & Pubbie senators who were pushing federalization. Fritz "there's too much consumin'" Hollings opened the committee by saying that a compromise could be reached, with the compromise being that these people would be federalized. It was all downhill from that point.

If I were a current screener, I'd be more than a little ticked off with the comments of some of the senators. They basically blamed the 9/11 attack on the incompetence of the current security workers, which is absolute idiocy, since there would have been no reason for the current screeners to keep the terrorists from getting on the planes.

I like to refer to the Senate as the "Graveyard of Freedom", with this bill being just the latest example of their treachery.

49 posted on 11/16/2001 1:17:59 PM PST by Major Matt Mason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Major Matt Mason
I like to refer to the Senate as the "Graveyard of Freedom", with this bill being just the latest example of their treachery.

Almost no one believes me when I say "You ain't seen nutin' YET"...!!!
50 posted on 11/16/2001 1:18:01 PM PST by freddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: freedomcrusader
cave?
51 posted on 11/16/2001 1:18:01 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomcrusader
Was there any doubt? If it pumps up big government it's a given. If it boosts big government labor unions, it's a given. If it weekens the conservative base's ability to influence politics in this nation, it's a given.

Give it to Mikey. He'll sign anything...

52 posted on 11/16/2001 1:18:02 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomcrusader
Well, so far the stupid party has given me every reason not to work nor to vote for them. They refuse to stand for anything and fall for everything. They seem to be afraid of the demorats and that being the case might as well vote for the rats, at least we know what we are getting.
53 posted on 11/16/2001 1:18:11 PM PST by engrpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Well once again the Spelunkers of the Year award goes to the Congressional GOP. They make OBL and his buddies look like amateurs when it comes to caving.

And Trent Lott probably thinks that he pulled a fast one with that tricky little exception, but watch the Dems find loopholes to get around that(just like with redistricting, Jeffords, elections, et. al.) But hey, with a spineless idiot as a leader, and moderate turncoats(who consider "straight talk" simply a marketing ploy) looking for every chance to appease the media("they like me, they really like me")what do you expect. (regardless of intentions) Moderates=Enablers of Evil

54 posted on 11/16/2001 1:18:22 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
Let me be more clear. This bill is just a symptom of the real problem. So much of the mess we are in right now can be laid directly at the appeasers who lack any principles other than going along to get along. Oh sure, they'll take a controversial stand or make someone angry, after the read the political winds. But it all comes back to whoring for popularity, selling your soul for security(marry a beer heiress, and you are set for life).

Yes, I put the blame squarely on the man who leads the revolts against GOP success, that slimy rat-bastard John McCain. How long will he use his "war hero" status as an excuse to block any attempts to stop our country from crumbling under the weight of excess and idiocy? You McCainiacs should be ashamed of yourselves, can you yet recognize the destruction your wobbliness is wreaking, your alliance with the unscrupulous liars theives, and cons? Probably not, I'm sure you've already searched the thesaurus of victimology to find some excuse, no you were just reacting to some greater invisible threat(why if we let the conservatives win on airline security, they might just be stronger in the next election, and then we might see more pro-life laws. GASP! Yep, better for a million to die of a terrorist nuke, than to restrict abortion ANY.) Just look at your shoes, one step at a time, irregardless of where it leads. Avoids difficult decisions right now.

Shame, shame, shame. Moderates=Enablers of Evil.

55 posted on 11/16/2001 1:18:25 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
I have the same question, Bunny. Since nobody answered, let's ask louder:

I don't understand. I thought this was not passed. What happened?


56 posted on 11/16/2001 1:18:47 PM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf
I was wondering if anyone noticed the fact that new thousands of federal employees will be created. At taxpayer expense, we will now be harassed while attempting to get into and out of airports.

We will now have airport security employees on the same par as the IRS, INS, and EPA. Ought to be real interesting.

57 posted on 11/16/2001 1:18:55 PM PST by dixierat22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dixierat22
This is so ridiculous. What everyone fails to realize is that the airport screeners did nothing wrong on 9/11. Those box cutters were perfectly legal at the time. Geez...the have steak knives in first class for crying out loud. So, now everyone is quit to pick on the poor baggage screeners and the Dems are salivating because here is a chance to expand the government. This is truly government acting in the most deplorable way.

The failure on 9/11 was the INS, FBI, and the CIA; not the baggage screeners for pete's sake!! Ugggghhhh...I get so mad at this. And now they say they will do it in 2 years? What the h**l? This should send a red flag to everyone that even the bozos in Congress know it is not the baggage screeners fault. They are just playing politics, pure and simple, and it stinks.

58 posted on 11/16/2001 1:19:03 PM PST by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: freedomcrusader
No one should be surprised by this outcome. Almost every elected Republican is a NEO-conservative - i.e. not a real conservative - at least by traditional standards.

In his 1995 book, Neoconservatism: The Autobiography of an Idea, Kristol announced what it (neo-conservatism) means to him:

"[We] are conservative, but different in certain respects from the conservatism of the Republican Party. We accepted the New Deal in principle, and had little affection for the kind of isolationism that then permeated American conservatism."

Neoconservatives even proudly admit their takeover of the word "conservative." In his 1996 book entitled The Essential Neoconservative Reader, editor Mark Gerson jubilantly observed:

"The neoconservatives have so changed conservatism that what we now identify as conservatism is largely what was once neoconservatism. And in so doing, they have defined the way that vast numbers of Americans view their economy, their polity, and their society.

From Bush on down, the neo-conservative agenda reigns ... and is being implemented. That's bad enough. But it's compounded by the fact that the rank-and-file/grassroots Republicans think they have voted for conservative leadership.

Afraid not folks. You didn't get the real thing ... so don't expect your idea of conservatism to be representated by elected "conservatives." Perhaps next election, you'll look a little bit closer at the candidates ... and just not jump at the first one who labels himself "conservative."

59 posted on 11/16/2001 1:19:04 PM PST by VoodooEconomist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomcrusader
The stupid party doing stupid things again. How could Bush and the House Republicans cave so massively on this? Because no one wants to get blamed for another Airline terrorism .

P.s this tells me AA587 was probably a terrorist act, no wonder the GOP caved in ASAP.

60 posted on 11/16/2001 1:19:04 PM PST by KQQL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson