Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Origin of the Palestine-Israel Conflict
www.cactus48.com ^ | 2000 | Jews for Justice

Posted on 11/16/2001 1:16:15 PM PST by ExiledInTaiwan

Click here for the book: Origin of Conflict


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 581-599 next last
To: equus
I was willing to admit I was wrong if you could prove the text was illegitimate.

No, my argument still stands. I don't have to prove anything. You are the one who is offering this text by "Nathan the Atheist" (assuming you can prove he really existed) as evidence. Therefore the burden of proof is entirely on you to prove this text is legitimate. Give a source for the archives of this alleged "Jewish Newsletter." (Gee, what a unique name! I'm sure you should have no trouble tracking it down!) Where was it published, when and by whom? What volume and issue number did this article by Nate the Atheist appear? Then, once you do succeed in tracking down the original source (I'm not holding my breath) it'll turn out to be some Communist propaganda sheet. Your credibility rating with me is pretty low, put up or shut up.

201 posted on 11/16/2001 1:19:32 PM PST by Alouette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: ExiledInTaiwan
No wonder you're ExiledInTaiwan, who the heck would believe this garbage?
202 posted on 11/16/2001 1:19:32 PM PST by KLT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
The Jews didn't run in making war, or demand that Britian clear these people out, they purchased the land from the Arabs at inflated prices, this is called ownership to those nazi's that don't understand the concept.

Interesting, isn't it?

203 posted on 11/16/2001 1:19:33 PM PST by Anamensis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

Comment #204 Removed by Moderator

To: John_11_25
Which one of those terrorist organizations is a freedom fighter organization? And did you notice something? These groups aren't fighting for freedom. They're fighting for pan Arab Islamicism. To be a part of that great big freedom loving cabal of Islamic States.
205 posted on 11/16/2001 1:19:44 PM PST by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

Comment #206 Removed by Moderator

To: Patria One
Funny, that Jews in America are doing just fine, but Israel has always been at war with her neighbors.

Which leads to the logical conclusion, that it is the neighbors who are the problem, not the Jews.

207 posted on 11/16/2001 1:19:45 PM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: equus
What is your point? You provide no specifics. Eyewitness accounts, reported in the NYTimes in 1948, assert that in a village of about 700+ people, 250 men, women and children were deliberately massacred. What is important about this is that it happened during the Palestinian exodus and was exemplary. Over 400 villages were destroyed and thousands massacred. This posting of yours gainsays none of this.

Did you read the article? Or rather the expose of your lies. Interesting that you'd keep your understanding to the NY Times CIRCA 1948. LOL!

208 posted on 11/16/2001 1:19:45 PM PST by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

Comment #209 Removed by Moderator

To: equus
B.S. with your "strategic" massacres. The Arabs started the rioting and massacres when they rejected Resolution 181. Do you have trouble reading? I quoted from a New Historian as well. Read how the Arabs began the aggression. They have only themselves to blame. And if you don't understand the course of the war. Just like the PLO in Lebanon the Arab irregulars (terrorists) were hiding in civilian areas and attacking Jews. This is the bunch you try to justify?
210 posted on 11/16/2001 1:19:45 PM PST by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: equus
Mt. Scopus Massacre

The pan Arab Islamic apologists like to pick and choose their "massacres" and then when examined more closely one sees the insidious Arab involvement in precipitating the escalation and killing. Since Deir Yassin was mentioned maybe we ought to mention the Mt. Scopus Massacre of Jews in April of 1948 even before Israel became a nation-state (Martin Gilbert, Jerusalem in the Twentieth Century, p. 203ff.):

On April 14 a convoy made up of ten vehicles - two ambulances, three armoured buses, three trucks with food and hospital supplies, and two small escort cars - set off at 9:30 in the morning for Mount Scopus, after receiving an assurance from the British officer in charge that the road was clear. The vehicles containing doctors, nurses, patients (including an Irgun man injured in the attack on Deir Yassin), and Hebrew University staff, were clearly marked with the insignia of the Magen David Adom - the Red Shield Society - the Jewish equivalent of the Red Cross.

Shortly after passing through the suburb of Sheikh Jarrah while moving up the hill to the corner known as Karm al-Mufti, the convoy struck a mine. It had been placed there by an Arab tailor, Mohammed Neggar. The lead escort vehicle, whose occupants were armed, negotiated the crater and tried to act as cover for the rest. The ambulance immediately behind it and two of the buses were damaged and could no longer move. The six vehicles in the rear, including one whose driver had been shot in the face by an Arab gunman, were able to turn around and return safely to the city.

The escort vehicle, the immobilised ambulance and the two buses were then hit by a barrage of rifle and grenade fire from Karm al-Mufti, and by Molotov cocktails. Firing continued throughout the morning. Except for those in the escort vehicle, no one in the convoy was armed; that had been a British condition for allowing the doctors and nurses to proceed....The British military post responsible for the safety of the road was less than 200 yeards away...Colonel Jack Churchill...a half-track with a machine-gunner to accompany him..drove his own armoured car to investigate. As he reached the scene, armed Arabs were arriving from every direction, shooting at the convoy....By three o'clock that afternoon the two buses were on fire. Most of the passengers who had not yet been killed were being burned alive. At a quarter past three Dr Yassky turned to his wife with the words, 'Shalom my dear, it's the end.' At that very moment a bullet passed through the slit in the front armour of the ambulance, and Yassky was killed. Fifteen minutes later, at 3:30, following further requests from Colonol Churchill, troops of the Highland Light Infantry, commanded by Brigadier C.P. Jones, launched an attack on the Arabs surrounding the convoy. Within an hour the Arabs were driven off. Twenty-eight Jews, twenty of whom were wounded, were rescued. Seventy-seven Jews had been killed....The dead in the Hadassah convoy included several leading members of the Faculty of Medecine, among them Dr. L. Doljansky, head of the Cancer Research Department.. He took no part in any social or political activities except for expressing his conviction of the importance of Arab-Jewish friendship......Several people going up to the hospital for surgery were also killed.....

After the Hadassah convoy attack, the Arab Higher Committee issued a statement. The attack had been commanded, it said, by an Iraqi officer. His had been a 'heroic exploit.'.....'Had it not been for Army interference,' the Arab Higher Committee pointed out in anger, 'not a single Jewish passenger would have remained alive.'


 

211 posted on 11/16/2001 1:19:46 PM PST by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: equus
Look, the nexus of the problem is what caused the exodus of 700,000 Palestinians in 1948, not something that happened in 1929

The nexus of the problem is that you blamed "zionist" terrorism for everything. And I proved to you that was a lie since historically the Irgun and Stern were formed years after ARAB terrorism had taken its toll on Jews. Follow your own arguments.

212 posted on 11/16/2001 1:19:46 PM PST by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

Comment #213 Removed by Moderator

To: veronica
And the SECOND poll did not identify how many ARAB Israelis were among those polled.

To the degree their views mirror those of Palestinians actually in the territories, Arab Israelis would be expected to be MORE, rather than less, OPPOSED to the peace process than Israeli jews, and by a large margin. (But I would be interested in what the actual case is if the data are available.)

214 posted on 11/16/2001 1:19:47 PM PST by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Elihu Burritt
A cycle is a thing that repeats over and over.

One force starts the cycle, other forces either accelerate it, or slow it down. An object in motion tends to stay in motion. Would you expect the Jews to just take the hits and not respond? Do you think that would prevent the cycle and prevent further acts of aggression?

Why were those 60 Jews murdered in Hebron on one day in 1929? There was no occupation. There was not even an Israel. There was no partition plan. There was no UN resolution. There was not even that many Jews in all of Palestine.

Are you aware that the mob that murdered these 60 Jews offered them a deal? They said they would spare the lives of the Sephardic Jews if the Sephardic Jews would turn over the Ashkenasi Jews to the mob. The Sephardic Jews refused such a macabre, racist offer to send their Ashekenasi brothers to their death, and for doing so they were murdered along with the others. How do you expect people to respond to such vile, hateful actions and such a cyncial, macabre offer? This action, among others, encouraged the creation of a cycle of violence. The cycle is born of hatred, racism, cynicism and sick thoughts and actions. The Jews chose not to take it lying down, and rightfully so.

215 posted on 11/16/2001 1:19:47 PM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: freefly
"MY type wants to see the conflict resolved, with both parties po'ed but with a workable solution."

Well, there's the problem. You're not a radical ADL seminar poster, like SA, that will toe the good old "Israel is right, no matter what, 'cause I got relatives over there" line. Why they even bother to call themselves "Americans" is beyond me.

216 posted on 11/16/2001 1:19:47 PM PST by ScreamingFist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

Comment #217 Removed by Moderator

To: equus
not something that happened in 1929 when riots broke out on both sides.

What two sides would that be? Oh, oh, I remember. It was the Arabs and the British.

218 posted on 11/16/2001 1:19:50 PM PST by Alouette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: equus
I consider the sources doubtful since they are Israeli.

Figures. You take a 1948 NY Times or even some Arab Islamic take but you can't dispute the nature of what happened and why it happened and the substantive claims form the article. Only a whining "consider the sources doubtful". Maybe you should also discount the posted article which initiated this thread since that's from Jews as well.

219 posted on 11/16/2001 1:19:50 PM PST by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: Lent
Someday Lent, when you visit Israel, you will go to Jerusalem.

You will go by Highway 1, the Tel Aviv- Jerusalem highway. It is the way to enter Jerusalem from the sea.

When you are about 4-5 miles from Jerusalem- look up. Don't do this if you are the driver or you will get into an accident on the winding road. You will look up not at an angle of 30 or 60 degrees. You will need to look almost straight up. As you are straining your neck, you will see the very top of the "hill". There was Dir Yassin- commanding the entire entrance to besieged Jerusalem.

The Arabs would insult your intelligence by telling you that during a war this very vital strategic location was a peaceful village with villagers going about minding their own business until the "evil" zionists showed up.

Visit Jerusalem. Look up. Let your own eyes prove their lies.

220 posted on 11/16/2001 1:19:50 PM PST by Sabramerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 581-599 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson