Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Neverending Story (The New Christian Chronicles)
Southern Baptists ending talks with Catholic Church ^ | 3/24/01 | AP

Posted on 10/15/2001 6:54:40 AM PDT by malakhi

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,081-1,1001,101-1,1201,121-1,140 ... 37,681-37,689 next last
To: RobbyS
We simply say that the Holy Tradition and Scripture are a seamless whole and doctrine does not contradict Scripture.

Ah, but we already have word from the Bible that the Pharisees, among others, used tradition to make the scriptures of none effect, as has the Catholic church - to whit, Mary was perpetually a virgin after the birth of Jesus. That 'tradition' was baptized into Doctrine and thus we have both tradition and doctrine in a single belief that is contrary to scripture. As we can plainly see that Jesus had not only 4 brothers; but sisters as well.

Not only does your logic fail you; but, so too does your church. And their apologetics. The very apologetics in logic they have used to prop up all the other 'traditions' and 'doctrines' they claim are inerrant and not contradictory. Don't close your eyes to it. And if it confuses you, pray to God in Jesus name to clear the confusion that you may see it clearly. Nobody here wants to confuse you; so, take the time to consider it and pray about it. The goal is truth. Will you believe what the scripture says?

1,101 posted on 10/18/2001 4:39:09 PM PDT by Havoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1068 | View Replies]

To: Havoc
Probably went to buy a new source. Catholic answers is proving unreliable. Rofl

Well, you were right, it seems they took it out of the site and put a truly inspired one back in.

I am sure that we can trust this one to be the official policy of the RCC's. At least until something goes wrong again. :-)

1,102 posted on 10/18/2001 4:43:26 PM PDT by JHavard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1095 | View Replies]

To: Havoc
your individual logic and reason - absent that of God, cannot understand the spiritual truths of God.

What on earth are you claiming here? To have a direct intuition of God?

1,103 posted on 10/18/2001 4:44:44 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1094 | View Replies]

To: dadwags
JH, I checked that website and it DID NOT deny the perpetual virginity of Mary . Maybe you had better check it again .

BTW, many of our dark-skinned citizens refer to their associates as "brothers" or "Bros".

Ok, what happened, fess up, did someone crash your site?

1,104 posted on 10/18/2001 4:47:56 PM PDT by JHavard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1103 | View Replies]

To: JHavard
#1093
JH, you are either invincibly ignorant or willfully Lying .
If Mary had other children, why does John record Jesus as giving her to him as mother and him to her as son ? in Jewish society, surviving sons were required to support their mothers .
Watch it, buster .
1,105 posted on 10/18/2001 4:50:31 PM PDT by dadwags
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1093 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
What on earth are you claiming here? To have a direct intuition of God?

Why do you marvel so at something the scripture proclaims. Are you ignorant that the lord lives in Christians and speaks with them? Are you ignorant of the purpose of the Holy Spirit? Or would you call Paul, an Apostle a liar:

1 Corinthians 2:[1] And I, brethren, when I came to you, came not with excellency of speech or of wisdom, declaring unto you the testimony of God. [2] For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified. [3] And I was with you in weakness, and in fear, and in much trembling. [4] And my speech and my preaching [was] not with enticing words of man's wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power: [5] That your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God. [6] Howbeit we speak wisdom among them that are perfect: yet not the wisdom of this world, nor of the princes of this world, that come to nought: [7] But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, [even] the hidden [wisdom], which God ordained before the world unto our glory: [8] Which none of the princes of this world knew: for had they known [it], they would not have crucified the Lord of glory. [9] But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him. [10] But God hath revealed [them] unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God. [11] For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God. [12] Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God. [13] Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual. [14] But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know [them], because they are spiritually discerned. [15] But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man. [16] For who hath known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him? But we have the mind of Christ.

You are so shaken and taken aback to run into a Christian who claims his birthright in the Lord and puts it to use. Do you not know you have the same birthright in Him by being saved and obedient to Him? Feel robbed yet?

1,106 posted on 10/18/2001 4:58:26 PM PDT by Havoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1103 | View Replies]

To: JHavard
Well, you were right, it seems they took it out of the site and put a truly inspired one back in.

Heaven forbid the truth should escape to the eyes of those they purport to teach the truth to. LOL. How quick the feet scurry to bury the truth in favor of an agenda.

1,107 posted on 10/18/2001 5:00:33 PM PDT by Havoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1102 | View Replies]

To: dadwags
If Mary had other children, why does John record Jesus as giving her to him as mother and him to her as son ? in Jewish society, surviving sons were required to support their mothers .

This has got to be the all time "twisting" of a reading that I have ever seen. Good job dadwags. :)

BigMack

1,108 posted on 10/18/2001 5:06:16 PM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1105 | View Replies]

To: dadwags
If Mary had other children, why does John record Jesus as giving her to him as mother and him to her as son ? in Jewish society, surviving sons were required to support their mothers .

This does not negate that duty. Jesus is King. He is also the Son of God and the First born natural heir of the line of David and to the Family. The family natural and spiritual responsibility first falls to Him. Or did you miss all these things in rush to make your point?

1,109 posted on 10/18/2001 5:06:57 PM PDT by Havoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1105 | View Replies]

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
Hi Payno (high five)!
1,110 posted on 10/18/2001 5:08:21 PM PDT by Havoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1108 | View Replies]

To: Havoc
Back at ya.

Bigmack

1,111 posted on 10/18/2001 5:10:26 PM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1110 | View Replies]

To: Havoc
Jerome's reply to Helvidius the the best answer to you, but the simply reply is that the teaching of the Church is the true interpretation of Scripture and that Helvidius' interpretation was wrong, in part because in a century tainted by Ariansm it casts doubt on the Virgin birth, or at least its significance. For if his mother had other children, then the birth narratives can be taken only as meaning that he was a great man or a prophet, but not the son of God, and Mary was in no sense Theotokos.
1,112 posted on 10/18/2001 5:17:07 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1101 | View Replies]

To: dadwags
JH, you are either invincibly ignorant or willfully Lying .

Uh... dadwags you might want to chech this out before you eat your plate of crow.

What the catholic church teaches:

MARY IS A PERPETUAL VIRGIN. The Catholic Church contends that Mary had no other children after bearing Jesus.

"The Blessed Virgin had no child other than Jesus. Such is, and has ever been, the faith of the Church, whom Christ has promised to assist till the end of time" (Any Questions?, p. 63). [ We must be careful to point out that this teaching WAS NOT the teaching of the church in the days of the Apostles, as we shall soon see! The phrase "has ever been the faith of the Church" is entirely false.]

"... the glorious ever Virgin Mary" (Vatican II documents, "Dogmatic Constitution on the Church").

What our God teaches from His Word:

Mary had other children after she bore Jesus. She was not a perpetual virgin!

"Is not this the carpenter's son? Is not his mother called Mary? And his brethren, James, and Joses, and Simon, and Judas? And his sisters, are they not all with us?" (Mt. 13:55-56).

How do you like your "Crow" medium Or well done? :)

BigMack

1,113 posted on 10/18/2001 5:35:06 PM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1105 | View Replies]

To: dadwags
If Mary had other children, why does John record Jesus as giving her to him as mother and him to her as son ? in Jewish society, surviving sons were required to support their mothers .

Copy...........Paste.....

This does not negate that duty. Jesus is King. He is also the Son of God and the First born natural heir of the line of David and to the Family. The family natural and spiritual responsibility first falls to Him. Or did you miss all these things in rush to make your point?

Yehhhhhh

Thank you Havoc.:-)

1,114 posted on 10/18/2001 5:38:40 PM PDT by JHavard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1105 | View Replies]

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
"Is not this the carpenter's son? Is not his mother called Mary? And his brethren, James, and Joses, and Simon, and Judas? And his sisters, are they not all with us?" (Mt. 13:55-56). How do you like your "Crow" medium Or well done? :)

Uh oh Big Mack......I smell a link comin' your way chosen from among Jerome, Arthur McGowan, Ignatius, Clement, Soothing Dave, Polycarp, Justin Martyr or somebody who knows more than the Bible. You've gone and done it now.

1,115 posted on 10/18/2001 9:07:33 PM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1113 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS; Havoc
Jerome's reply to Helvidius the the best answer to you, but the simply reply is that the teaching of the Church is the true interpretation of Scripture and that Helvidius' interpretation was wrong, in part because in a century tainted by Ariansm it casts doubt on the Virgin birth, or at least its significance. For if his mother had other children, then the birth narratives can be taken only as meaning that he was a great man or a prophet, but not the son of God, and Mary was in no sense Theotokos

Man can you imagine having to keep all this stuff tidy? No wonder narrow is the way. I'm beginning to think all the intelectuals and scholars make it and nobody else. And don't flatter yourself Robby I'm not saying you a scholar.

1,116 posted on 10/18/2001 9:10:41 PM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1112 | View Replies]

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
This has got to be the all time "twisting" of a reading that I have ever seen. Good job dadwags. :)

This one can't be Big Mack. I've already assigned that title to Matthew 1;25. But this is worthy of honorable mention. :-)

1,117 posted on 10/18/2001 9:12:34 PM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1108 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE
I still don't know whether I left the RCC or I was thrown out.

LOLROF !!!


1,118 posted on 10/18/2001 9:13:03 PM PDT by hopefulpilgrim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1056 | View Replies]

To: dadwags
Good point, dadwags. Hmmmm...I will chew on this awhile...
1,119 posted on 10/18/2001 9:17:03 PM PDT by hopefulpilgrim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1058 | View Replies]

To: hopefulpilgrim
I still don't know whether I left the RCC or I was thrown out.

I was just throw out of my altar boy duties in the 4th grade. I left on my own much later although had I been faithful in attendance I would have been excomunicated. Sheesh, its even confusing when ya leave. :-)

1,120 posted on 10/18/2001 9:17:08 PM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,081-1,1001,101-1,1201,121-1,140 ... 37,681-37,689 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson