Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

National Review Cans Columnist Ann Coulter
Washington Post ^ | 10/2/01 | Howard Kurtz

Posted on 10/01/2001 10:00:14 PM PDT by Jean S

Edited on 09/03/2002 4:49:21 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Even by her usual incendiary standards, Ann Coulter's response to the terrorist attacks was something of a jaw-dropper.

"We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity," the conservative commentator declared in her column on National Review Online.

Those words created an uproar at the Web site, which refused to run a follow-up piece in which Coulter singled out what she called "swarthy males." She promptly began bad-mouthing National Review, which responded by axing her as a contributing editor.


(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 441-455 next last
To: TLBSHOW
Joe Sobran has already learned the limits neoconservative PC puts on political discourse at NR, Sam Francis has already learned the same limits at the Washington Times.
321 posted on 10/02/2001 5:54:21 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: JMJ333
"How easy it would be to "convert" these folks!!"

Well, really not that hard.

Corps, 10 rounds, shell ICM-DP in effect, time on target in 5 minutes from now...Mark!"

Not really that difficult, actually!

322 posted on 10/02/2001 5:57:17 AM PDT by Redleg Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
Thank you for the obligatory Ann C pic with legs.
323 posted on 10/02/2001 5:59:59 AM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BoomerBob
"Since when is the firing of an opinionated woman considered PC?"

When it is an opinionated conservative woman, lefty!

324 posted on 10/02/2001 6:00:57 AM PDT by Redleg Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke
National Review is full of it. The read every column before they publish it. When they publish, they approve of all the content they publish. They are throwing Ann to the wolves, just as they did Pat Buchanan and Joe Sobran.
325 posted on 10/02/2001 6:05:23 AM PDT by Don
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: BoomerBob
I might suggest to all that National Review has done more for the Coservative cause than Ann Coulter will ever be able to do.

But it's a much different NR now. Soon after JFK's assassination, a network news type took a verbal swipe at the magazine by suggesting that the assassination was probably to be expected in a nation where a national magazine could "come out for" hanging Earl Warren. (A recent NR cartoon had portrayed Warren on the gallows.) The NR response written by Wm. F. Buckley, Jr., mocking this absurdly literal interpretation of the cartoon included the line: "Damn the torpedoes? What had the torpedoes ever done to him?". But that was in 1964, when Wm. F. Buckley, Jr. was a much younger and much funner man.

326 posted on 10/02/2001 6:13:08 AM PDT by WarrenC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nocomad
For those of us who aren't Christian, the rature is poppycock.

You merely confirm the truth of what Paul wrote in 1st Corinthians 1:18. "For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God."

There are some here who love to take any opportunity to ridicule Christians and their beliefs. Whether or not you want to call that "bashing" is irrelevant to me (personally I think the word "bashing" is used much too loosely for ANY criticism of various groups). At any rate, regardless of how much you or others ridicule Christians and our beliefs, I pray that as God continues to reveal Himself and His Truth to you, it will find its way to your heart and mind and lead you to turn to Him before it is too late.

Kindest regards.

327 posted on 10/02/2001 6:20:12 AM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
NR gone PC?

We may have bigger problems than a bunch of terrorists.

328 posted on 10/02/2001 6:25:05 AM PDT by wcbtinman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke
Corps, 10 rounds, !!!

Why be so timid? Let your hair down and don't hold back, Redleg. LOL.

That'll convert 'em. That'll convert 'em Real Good.

I like your style, Hooah!

329 posted on 10/02/2001 6:32:15 AM PDT by LTCJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
The rats have started their attack now that NAtional Review has really screwed up.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/cgi-bin/duforum/duboard.cgi?az=list_threads&om=5416&forum=DCForumID5

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha...." You gotta love that karma, eh? I thought that quote was so great: "Right-wing Telebimbo" that's priceless, I've gotta remember it for later Terrific story, kskiska, thanks!!! Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Top JoeBacon (59 posts) Oct-02-01, 02:02 AM (ET) 2. "She got what she deserved!" LAST EDITED ON Oct-02-01 AT 02:11 AM (ET) Amazing--I have read that piece five times and am still in total disbelief. No doubt, Little Orphan Annie will blame this on Bill Clinton too. Please, God. I'm praying right now that she finds herself unemployable and winds up homeless. It couldn't happen to a more deserving wench! Hey, God--just once, could you have Geraldo whack this bimbo in the face with a cream pie, too! Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Top JitterbugPerfume (279 posts) Oct-02-01, 02:10 AM (ET) 5. "h the likes of Goldberg and Lowreydon't want'cha" and you're a right wing bimbo....I'd say you're in some deep doodoo Bye Bye Annie Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Top Thtwudbeme (465 posts) Oct-02-01, 02:02 AM (ET) 3. "What a complete fruitloop" I have not seen this woman, nor any Republican that I can think of right offhand, express any shred of remorse, regret...nothing. They will obviously go straight to their graves spreading hatred for their fellow man. Sick. Remove | Alert Edit | Reply | Top kskiska (2368 posts) Oct-02-01, 02:04 AM (ET) 4. "This made my day." Now I can quit and go to bed.

330 posted on 10/02/2001 6:40:39 AM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BoomerBob
A voice of reason. I read Ann Coulter in "Human Events". Her columns are entertaining and provocative.

I've always questioned her judgement when it came out that she was instrumental in trapping Clinton in the Monica scandal.

So for 2 years, the country was focussed on cigars, crooked organs, etc. while the real scandals (which led up to the September 11 disaster) like speeding up the immigration process, making citizens out of felons, the China connection, etc. were pushed into the background.

If we want to convert Mainstream Americans to conservatism, let's face it. They WON'T listen to Ann Coulter.

331 posted on 10/02/2001 6:47:19 AM PDT by DLfromthedesert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rockfish59
???
332 posted on 10/02/2001 6:51:10 AM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

Comment #333 Removed by Moderator

To: The Raven
"We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity" (Ann C)
"Convert them to Christianity after they're dead?" (raven)

Quick grammar lesson regarding pronouns and antecedents: When you see pronouns like "their" and "them" used, you must read the previous words to find to whom these pronouns refer. This sentence is right after a sentence about Ann's revulsion at the sight of "Palestinians" and other arabs dancing in the streets and celebrating the death of our citizens. So "their" and "them" refer to the people dancing in the streets, i.e. invade the countries of the people dancing in the streets, kill the leaders of the people dancing in the streets, and convert the people dancing in the streets to Christianity. (Now, as any Christian would understand, the ONLY way anyone can be converted to Christianity is by faith which comes by hearing the Word of God preached in love. A conversion to Christianity would change the hearts of the people who were dancing in the streets so that they would not celebrate the death of innocent men, women, and children.)

334 posted on 10/02/2001 6:52:51 AM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

Comment #335 Removed by Moderator

To: JeanS
This whole situation is not good. I like NR. NRO has done a great job of discussing the events on and after 09/11. I also like Ann's style. Nice.

Dissapointed that that she will not be writing for NR. Am also dissapointed by some of the comments that both Ann and Jonah made. But I'll still read both Ann and NR/NRO. And while I do that, both Ann and Jonah need to grow up.

336 posted on 10/02/2001 6:59:30 AM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Plummz, boyd, thinden, Jerry_M, roughrider, babylonian
Okay, let's break it down.

"Invade their countries". Is this not a good idea? Is this not about to happen? So, Ann was not fired for saying the obvious.

"Kill their leaders". Is this not a good idea? Is this not about to happen? Bring me the head of Osama Bin Laden is the real-time movie about to be played out on your television. So, Ann was not fired for saying the obvious.

"Convert them to Christianity". Aha! This is politically incorrect, and this is why Ann was canned.

Now, relish the irony.

National Review is completely owned by Roman Catholic Bill Buckley, jr.

And, like many Roman Catholics, the idea of "converting them to Christianity" means converting Muslims to Protestantism.

Bill Buckley jr. does NOT want "Protestant" converts in the Muslim lands.

Ann touched the holy nerve of American politically correctness.

337 posted on 10/02/2001 7:12:20 AM PDT by Aggressive Calvinist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fury
Not to throw a dissenting view into the Ann love (lust) fest, but, ANY writer who gets in a snit about editorial revisions is quite possibly not going to be published by edited periodicals.

The whole story isn't here, obviously, but if they asked her to make some changes, and her response was to go on Bill Maher's show and complain that they are spineless, well, she sealed her own fate.

Everyone has a right to express their own views. That does not translate into a right to have someone else publish them.

She knows that.

338 posted on 10/02/2001 7:15:47 AM PDT by blaster88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Sorry, I will take National Review over that self righteous bimbo anyday. Forced conversion, what a great idea . She should go eat a hamburger or something, shes not that great looking.
339 posted on 10/02/2001 7:21:05 AM PDT by LongsforReagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StoneColdGOP
Get a life. Or better yet, get a wife. "TV love" is not way to go through life son.
340 posted on 10/02/2001 7:22:53 AM PDT by LongsforReagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 441-455 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson