1 posted on
09/30/2001 5:36:15 PM PDT by
aculeus
To: Alberta's Child
FYI....I'll wager you can enlighten us all about this proposal.
To: aculeus
the Canadians also have a way of separating oil electrostatically now that allows you to take out oil from "dry" wells, and return soil to the ground that you can plant in. The oil is almost as pure as that pumped out of the ground by standard means. They have prototypes running, but have met a lot of resistance from American oil companies. As soon as our environmental laws catch up, they hope to license the technique to smaller oil producers in this country. They estimate enough oil left in already drilled and abandoned wells to last long into the future.
To: aculeus
Sounds good to me! But out of the communes would rush the "Canadian Capers" (Canadians Against Pollution , Energy and Rightist Swindlers).
Leni
4 posted on
09/30/2001 5:56:56 PM PDT by
MinuteGal
To: aculeus
We should have stop their bomb building years ago. Iran and Iraq are too close to big bombs.
6 posted on
09/30/2001 5:59:26 PM PDT by
bmwcyle
To: aculeus
Unfortunately Canada also has something else. Something that Saudi Arabia doesn't have: evironmentalists. An even more radical and fervent (though perhaps less violent) crowd than the US. And the violence deficiency would be quickly made up by the radical WTO "flying terrorist columns".
That means your costs of extraction have to include both the massive, burdensome, and mostly counter-productive regulations that the Greens will force the legislature to pass, but also the costs of eco-terrorism and "protests". Blocked trucks, sabotaged equipment, month-long "sit-ins" (like they do in the trees to stop lumbering), and blown-up pipelines (the damage then blamed on you for your "lax security"), are only the beginnings. Add lawsuits by every left-leaning American lawyer seeking to make a name for himself (we have over half the worlds supply of lawyers).
I would dearly love to see Canada develope it's energy reserves, but I fear the enviros have that stopped before it's begun. Good luck, though! You have my best wishes!
To: aculeus
"And then maybe Canada could take the place of Saudi Arabia in the American universe. "This could be a whole new nightmare.;^)
13 posted on
09/30/2001 6:27:13 PM PDT by
Kermit
To: aculeus
OH NO!!! Does this mean the Canadians are going to start wearing towels around their heads and yelling, "DEATH TO AMERICA!!!!"??
14 posted on
09/30/2001 6:40:07 PM PDT by
manx
To: aculeus
Until the mid-1990s, producing a barrel of oil cost upwards of $15 (U.S.). That didn't leave much room for things like profits when the price of oil was at $20 and it seemed especially ridiculous given that some OPEC countries can produce a barrel of oil for about $5 or less.Profit over principle and peace is why big oil still hasn't told Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and the rest to pound sand.
To: aculeus
We should give ANWR to another country. Then we wouldn't feel so guilty about taking oil from it =)
17 posted on
09/30/2001 6:47:27 PM PDT by
xm177e2
To: aculeus
18 posted on
09/30/2001 6:48:22 PM PDT by
Clive
To: aculeus
Interesting
To: aculeus
At current levels of use, we have an estimated 1,000 year supply of NATURAL GAS in the Gulf of Mexico
ALONE. Converting a gasoline engine to Liquified Natural Gas is a relatively inexpensive process.
LNG burns more cleanly than gasoline.
Why haven't we converted to LNG?
Start asking questions about that of your congresscritter and any oil company exec you can corner.
To: aculeus
If it was economic to extract the oil from Canada, the market would do so. We wouldn't need a bunch of loser policy geeks to "decide" that we should get the oil.
Besides, why use up our oil now, I say lets use the arabs, and we'll use ours when they run out.
To: aculeus
and it seemed especially ridiculous given that some OPEC countries can produce a barrel of oil for about $5 or less. US crude oil consumption is about 20 million barrels a day or 7.3 billion barrels per year. I would estimate that DoD spending to ensure its flow exceeds $10 / barrel or $73 B per year. So if military costs are figured in, Alberta tar sands would seem to be cheaper that Middle Eastern oil.
To: aculeus
Plenty of oil in lower 48 plus offshore anyway. Bullsh-t is the main thing stopping it. This "energy runnng out" crapola has got to stop. All P.C. B. S. PHD.
30 posted on
09/30/2001 7:44:15 PM PDT by
Waco
If we don't buy it? who else will? how long do you think these opec billionaires will sit around not collecting money...not long.
To: aculeus
Whoever has the most oil last, wins.
47 posted on
09/30/2001 9:19:35 PM PDT by
slimer
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson