Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 09/18/2026 9:32:28 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
No good deed goes unpunished. Especially in the socialist state of New York, where the Attorney General has transformed herself into a one-woman Board of Real Estate Values and Applications. A few years ago, Letitia James aimed her peculiar interests in private property at Donald Trump. Now James refuses to release the proceeds of a Manhattan property sale to aging nuns who can no longer support the ministry they ran in New York City for more than a century.
And it's no small amount, either. The Sisters of the Congregation of Divine Providence, based in Kentucky, ran the Jeanne D'Arc Residence for 123 years to benefit young women coming to the city on their own. The order grew too small to continue operations, as Madeleine Long reports for the Free Press, and needed to shift resources to support aging members of their own religious order and others – itself a charitable effort. The sisters sold the property to John Catsimidis for $22.5 million. As required by New York State law, James' office approved the sale of the property owned by a charitable organization.
And then it seized the proceeds and has, for two years, refused to release them. Why? James disapproves of the plans the order has for their use:
The attorney general’s office told The Free Press that the religious order never provided “a breakdown of what they plan to do with the funds,” even though Christine Sama, the sisters’ lawyer, had told state officials in a January letter that the money would be used “to carry out the exact same activities as Jeanne d’Arc.”
In an interview, Sama told The Free Press that state officials objected to plans by the religious order to use the money to care for aging sisters at Holy Family Home, the order’s retirement home in Kentucky. They also plan to support their other ministries, which include running a local emergency shelter, supporting immigrant resettlement, and operating health clinics and schools in rural Madagascar.
“They are saying that use is not sufficiently similar” to the building that the sisters sold, Sama said.
Long points out that New York and James have a track record of poking her nose into the business of nuns. At the moment, several orders have sued the state over its Medical Aid in Dying (MAID) law that requires all hospice centers to at least facilitate assisted suicide. The plaintiffs in that case forced the state to agree to waive the punitive fines that would have closed their doors until their suit proceeds to trial. In that case as well, New York has assumed the role of defining both religious principles and the narrow interests of "charity" in the Empire State.
This case may have a different context, but it highlights the same arrogance. The Sisters of the Congregation of Divine Providence owned that property, used it for clearly charitable purposes, and can no longer support the specific mission after 123 years of devoted service to the people of New York. The order sold it legally, and has complied with state law in filing a plan for use of the sale funds in other charitable endeavors. That should be the end of the discussion. All the state needs to know – and even this is a stretch – is that the charitable organization will use the proceeds for charitable purposes. It is not the prerogative of the state to dictate the specifics of how charitable organizations use their money.
And that is because it is their money, not Letitia James' money or the state's money. The sisters complied with state law to the point that the proposal looked "suspiciously solid," one expert told Long:
The religious order has a strong case, according to Robert E. Atkinson Jr., a Florida State University law professor who is a scholar of charitable law and cy pres doctrine. The proposal is “suspiciously solid,” he told The Free Press, so much so that it is hard to see why the situation would be seen even as a close call.
Atkinson told me that under cy pres, courts ask three basic questions: Did the donors have a general charitable intent? Has the original purpose failed? And is the proposed new use as close as possible to that purpose? “It really is a no-brainer,” he said, since the sisters’ planned use for the $19.3 million is closely aligned in a functional sense with Jeanne d’Arc’s historic charitable purpose: helping the needy.
It's a no-brainer in another way entirely. James has seized the money because she wants to punish those who operate charities outside of the control of the state, much as Kathy Hochul is doing with the MAID law. James has stolen the money from aging Catholic nuns for no good legal reason otherwise, and certainly no good moral reason either. The nuns will now have to waste money, and more importantly, their diminishing time to help their aging order in a court fight to get their money back from the greedy, grasping Attorney General who has stolen two years of opportunity from an order that devoted itself to New York City for 123 years.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
She spent the money. Thats why.
Sue her!!
Meanwhile, publicize what’s going on and how she tries to justify keeping those funds.
I’ll bet she wouldn’t keep clutching to $19. Million that was taken from a local Mosque. Those people would walk straight to her front door and loudly knock for some answers.
This godawful female stole this woman’s money & won’t return because she’s too busy spending.
She’s trying to figure out a way to steal it.
An Attorney General (state or federal) can seize money from a private property sale .......
but only if the funds or the property itself are tied to illegal activity.
Asset forfeiture-——How Seizure Works
Civil Forfeiture: The government sues the property or proceeds directly.Criminal Forfeiture: Seizure occurs after a criminal conviction.
Traceable Proceeds: Money from a sale counts as illegal proceeds if the original asset was bought with or tied to crime.
Court Orders: Prosecutors or the Attorney General must obtain a restraining order, lien, or warrant.
No Charges Required: Civil forfeiture lets authorities seize assets without filing criminal charges.
Preponderance of Evidence: The state only needs basic proof that funds connect to a crime.Strict Deadlines: Owners have a very short window to contest the seizure in court.
Total Loss Risk: Failing to respond means losing the money permanently.
Patriots, Call Congress
US Capitol switchboard
(202) 224-3121.
Call the White House
Comments: 202-456-1111
Switchboard: 202-456-1414
TTY/TTD Comments: 202-456-6213
Send a letter to the White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington, DC 20500
Message: Under an obscure New York state law, the Attorney General’s “Charities Bureau” must approve the sale of assets by non-profit and religious entities to ensure the money is handled according to their corporate charters.
While Attorney General Letitia James approved the sale itself and released part of the money to cover the order’s carrying costs, taxes, and broker fees, her office gratuitously withheld the remaining $19.3 million.
The state invented specious reasons, arguing that the Kentucky-based congregation’s intended plan for the funds is not “substantially similar” to the original New York residential mission outlined in the property’s charter.
The $19 million remains locked in an escrow or holding account pending a resolution of the regulatory dispute.
James should stop her power-mongering and release the funds ar once.
Sounds like the law itself is unconstitutional. They should not control how a charity chooses to spend its money at all. It is none of their business and not only that it is protected by the freedom of religion amendment
Sounds like the NY seizure law itself is unconstitutional.
They should not control how a charity chooses to spend its money.
It is none of their business and, it is protected by the freedom of religion amendment.
Excellent deconstruction.
mark
I wonder if she could have it in some sort of investment account, wherein she siphons off the interest, but could return the principal if she really had to.
If the.New Axis of Evil Democrats communists and Muslims get control of our lives stories like this will be so come that they won’t be reported any longer. The New Axis of Evil hates God hates America and hates REALITY.
It is now obvious that the Supreme Court is compromised so where do we go for justice? This is why every True American must do whatever he or she can to save our freedoms
Because she’s EVIL! PURE EVIL!!!
Letitia loud, arrogant, POS James is EVIL. Can anyone stop her?
Bkmk
Based in Kansas, sold property in NY. Sounds like a case of interstate theft and jurisdiction of the Department of Justice. File a criminal complaint against her.
Many DIMocRATs are integrity-free, caustic grifters who use their positions to harass and commit crimes against those they don’t “like” for some reason.
If only James had the same concern for NY based NGOs.
EC
Pending A Resolution = Looking For An Island to Buy
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.