Posted on 09/16/2026 1:53:39 AM PDT by Mount Athos
For Americans who follow the Russian-Ukrainian war, the past few months must look very strange. In the first half of summer, the story from Kyiv – and the many western media outlets that repeated it – was that Ukraine was winning. Then, not long after the NATO summit in July, Kyiv announced it lacked the interceptors to prevent a winter disaster. The country needed 300 missiles to survive, we were told. Even if these 300 missiles arrive, they are unlikely to protect a country as large as Ukraine from the sheer volume of Russian ballistic attacks and glide-bomb strikes. Now it’s September, and Ukraine says it’s facing a $27 billion shortfall in defense funding. There seems to be a vast difference between the public relations campaign and the reality in Ukraine.
There is a feeling that the western political establishment would rather see Russia burn than Ukraine saved
I know a little about that public relations campaign. I was President Zelensky’s first press secretary, entering office alongside him in 2019. I left in 2021 and remained sympathetic to the President as he fought the Russian invasion. But by 2025, I’d come to the conclusion that Ukraine will never be able to win this war militarily. The only solution is a negotiated peace.
Under the current Ukrainian regime, the chances of peace seem remote. In late June, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy approved a 40-day campaign of long-range drone strikes within Russia to force the Kremlin to end the war. It was supposed to be an “influence operation,” designed to show the Russian people the true cost of the conflict. But it was Ukrainians who suffered the most. The Kremlin instead escalated, bringing more destruction, more death and none of the negotiations that would ultimately save lives. Russia, it seems, was only emboldened by the attacks. The Kremlin merely reiterated its conditions for ending its aggression.
It is, of course, Russia who started this war. Its forces have tortured, raped, deported and killed Ukrainians. There is no moral symmetry between Kyiv and the Kremlin. Yet it is clear that the Ukrainian heroism of 2022 is long gone. Kyiv’s war policies have hardened into permanent mobilization and superficial PR – empty slogans and moral posturing are all that’s now offered. The desperate situation in Ukraine’s streets is concealed so that the refusal to compromise can be dressed up as courage.
In 2022, when the war began, the whole country stood up to defend itself. Men lined up at recruitment offices, and cities that Moscow tried to seize successfully resisted. All this naturally produced admiration throughout the world – and glorification in the western media and political circles. Today, that same glorification has become an unbearable burden. There is a feeling that the western political establishment would rather see Russia burn than Ukraine saved. Our daily losses are treated as an acceptable price for that end.
Ukraine has lost more than half its population in the 35 years since it declared independence from the Soviet Union. The largest collapse in population has happened since Russia’s full-scale invasion. By the most sober estimates, some 20 to 25 million people remain in the territory Kyiv still controls. Roughly half are of retirement age. At most, four million men are of conscription age. Russia can draw on the recruitment pool of approximately 10 times the number of fighting age men. Waging a war of attrition is therefore national suicide, not valor. Yet this is the strategy that the Zelensky government pursues.
The economy tells the same story. Ukraine is now entirely dependent on western aid, which is shrinking. Money that was supposed to be used to rebuild the country is being consumed by war. Public debt has crossed 110 percent of GDP. Russia, by contrast, has not had to borrow anywhere near this scale to wage its war, and it is still selling energy to the European Union. Since 2022, European countries have paid Moscow well over $230 billion for fossil fuels – more than they have given Kyiv in aid of all forms. Despite the innumerable sanctions packages, Russia keeps earning money and has a much stronger fiscal position than most EU states. Meanwhile, Ukraine is being crippled by the death of its people and the destruction of its productive base, while its debts keep accumulating.
European countries have paid Moscow over $230 billion for fossil fuels – more than they have given Kyiv in aid
Since the “influence operation” this summer, more than 90 percent of Ukrainian warehouses have been hit, our energy system has been torn apart and a humanitarian catastrophe will arrive with the winter snow. In the fifth year of full-scale war, the state’s offer to civilians in the worst-affected regions is often simply: leave. People on the front line who have no money and no means are told to go somewhere else.
Every day Ukraine loses more of its people. Those who want their children to have proper healthcare and education are forced to emigrate. The number of people dying in Ukraine is roughly four times the number of births. The nation is perishing, and yet the war grinds on.
Finland lost land after a devastating war, yet it managed to preserve its nation and its future. Ukraine could still become a frontier between the West and Russia: armed, sober and alive. But the present strategy is pushing us down a different path: that of Afghanistan.
The West spent 20 years pouring trillions of dollars into that conflict. All it achieved was flourishing corruption, decades of death and eventually the fall of Kabul to the Taliban. As in Ukraine, there was heavy censorship in western media. Most of those who reported from the region were uncompromising in their support of the Afghan state machine and the war, no matter what.
We see many of the same parallels in Ukraine. Extraordinarily, corruption rivals the war in rankings of public opinion as the biggest national problem. There are those in the Ukrainian government who are making millions of dollars from this war. I have just been sanctioned by the Zelensky government for saying so publicly.
Meanwhile, normal Ukrainian men do not leave their homes for months, for fear of press gangs who hunt them in the streets. There are reports of the disabled being pushed into frontline combat, of men dying mysteriously in recruitment offices, of women fighting to save husbands from being kidnapped in plain daylight. According to the Ukrainian ombudsman, only 2-3 percent of those seized in press gang raids ever reach the frontline. Many pay, sometimes tens of thousands of dollars, to buy their way out. The corruption around this system runs into the billions of dollars annually. I do not blame my people for refusing to fight for a machine they no longer believe in.
If the purpose of this war was to create a path for Ukraine to join NATO, that prospect is already off the table. If the purpose was to recover territory, Ukraine is losing more of it, not taking it back. If it was to protect democracy, then the wartime martial law has already killed it. Freedom of speech has been greatly restricted, institutions have been corrupted, basic political rights suspended, the constitution violated, political opponents persecuted. All of this with a casualness about human life that would be recognized as deeply authoritarian anywhere else.
The war in Ukraine has lost any plausible theory of victory. At this point, it only lines the pockets of a corrupt and narrow circle of elites while the country itself perishes. Ukraine can still choose the Finnish road: stop the bleeding, hold what can be held, restore the economy and a way of life to which people can return. The other road is already visible. It is a road down which we lose land and people every day – and with them, the chance that there will be a Ukraine left to win.
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
Hes a madman, so he doesnt care.
How much was the Ukraine getting from USAID before we choked off that pipeline?
What he is suggesting is surrendering to Putin, and implying that Putin would agree to stop conquering more Ukrainian territory. Putin will not stop (perhaps pause) until he has totally conquered Ukraine, and outlawed Ukrainian identity.
Then the Ukrainians will be used like the Buryats have been, as cannon fodder for future Russian conquests.
Putin must be stopped.
I watched the first season of the war then it became repetitive with Russians winning then Ukraine is winning and found something else to watch.
then, the article has non-sequitor questions "If the purpose of this war was to create a path for Ukraine to join NATO, that prospect is already off the table. If the purpose was to recover territory, Ukraine is losing more of it, not taking it back. If it was to protect democracy, then the wartime martial law has already killed it. "
The purpose of this war for Moscow was to prevent Ukraine from going out of the rossiski Mir, the Muscowite orbit -- that's why Putin went for the head shot on 25 Feb 2022 - and he failed
The purpose of this war for Ukrainians is to NOT go under Moscow's thumb again
you are correct, BeauBo
the problem is that Russians, unlike the Germans in 1945, haven't yet realized that they are no longer a superpower that can bully everyone.
I have worked projects in more than 40 countries around the world - Ukraine is the most corrupt place I have ever been.
That’s why Biden loved it - Ukraine is a grifter’s dream site.
Dictator Zelensky decrees it so.
Authored by Ukraine’s press secretary from 2019-2021 and proponent of accepting Russia’s terms even if that means extermination of every Ukrainian as promised by Putin.
Take power and bilk the stupid US! 😠😠😠😠😠
90 years after Holodomor what do you expect?
Wasn’t the venerable old Spectator bought out and repurposed by investors from the UAE a while back, right before they started getting in the habit of kissing Putin’s butt?
The takeover started like this:
Jeff Zucker’s RedBird IMI Pitches Offer for Bankrupt UK Publisher of The Daily Telegraph and Spectator
Breitbart ^ | 21 Nov 2023 | Simon Kent
Posted on 11/21/2023, 4:37:34 PM by Olog-hai
Failed CNN boss Jeff Zucker still wants to stay in the media game. To that end he is leading an offer to buy the bankrupt British publishing group behind the Daily Telegraph newspaper and Spectator magazine.
The New York Post reports Zucker, the chief executive of Abu Dhabi-backed investment group RedBird IMI, is ready to pitch $750 million to the Barclay family that would allow them to repay their nearly $1.4 billion debt to Lloyds Banking Group.
RedBird, a venture capital firm that has $1 billion in capital, would then have an option to convert the loan secured against the mainstay conservative publications into equity, Financial Times reported on Monday.
Lloyds seized the publications in June from the the Barclay brothers — Sir David and Sir Frederick — who bought the titles from Canada’s Conrad Black in 2004 for $1.3 billion. If Lloyds agrees to the proposal, the deal will mark the end of the Barclay family ownership of the Telegraph, a conservative broadsheet founded in 1855, and the Spectator, which has been published weekly since 1828. …
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Is he still trying to divert money to Democrats or did he pinky swear to never try that again?
A Ukrainian version of Jim Jones.
I don’t like Zielinski, and have expressed that I don’t like Putin much either. I don’t blame Russia for the events in Ukraine, that the US CIA played a role, that destabilized Ukraine. I do blame Russia for the invasion, rape, murders, and illegal transportation of citizens—especially children.
I have to ask after reading this article, what the Press Secretary from 2019-2021 thought that Zielinski should have done when Ukraine was invaded? Everyone is a critic, but not everyone has a plan. Since Zielinski didn’t invade himself, this person who authored this article should say exactly what he would have done so we can begin from there.
I am betting it would be ‘crickets’ for a long time and something after that sounded like Russian propaganda about how he should give up half his country to the aggressor/rapist/murders/war criminals. Once we got to that one question, we could all just ignore him.
Yes, I 100% agree that I am not offering a plan that moves anything forward. So I propose that Russia surrender half of all Russian territory to Ukraine, and China takes Siberia as a compromise. No, it’s not anymore ridiculous that what the Russian apologists propose. Russia will probably lose Siberia to China anyway when it’s economy fails, because the only ‘winner’ in this conflict is the Chinese.
Balderdascious drivel
I have a good friend in Charlotte NC. His wife is from the Ukraine. (Very nice lady). Your statement is spot on. It is a S**t show over there.
Here’s my take: The Russians realize that there are few solutions to this conflict. The are groups in Ukraine who will never quit, and there will be guerilla fighters for years. There’s no land border that will separate the two sides but the Dnieper river. Ukraine will become the new East Germany.
He would be worse, imo.
The terrorists think they are serving God. He knows he is only serving himself.
The terrorists only want to kill enough to get submission in society. Zelensky wants to kill every Ukranian male, presumably to force females to mix-race.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.