Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Floats Plan to 'Reverse Birthright Citizenship' in Spite of the Supreme Court
The Western Journal ^ | June 30, 2026 at 11:28am | Randy DeSoto

Posted on 07/01/2026 5:07:13 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

President Donald Trump responded to Tuesday’s Supreme Court’s ruling striking down his birthright citizenship executive order by appearing to back immigration legislation that would further clarify how immigrants can become citizens.

In a 6-3 ruling, justices held that an executive order Trump issued on the first day of his second term violated the Constitution. The order greatly restricted the circumstances in which a baby born in the United States would automatically be granted American citizenship.

The Fourteenth Amendment states, in part, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, concluded, “Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause.”

After the ruling, the president used the Truth Social social media platform to post a link to an article from the Washington-based website Just the News that was headlined:  “Trump’s efforts to reverse birthright citizenship may succeed with or without SCOTUS.”

He followed up with a second post, writing, “The Supreme Court upheld Birthright Citizenship, which is too bad for our Country, but we can easily make it up in Congress through Legislation, with the support of the President, that has now been determined during this process.”

“No long and unwieldy Constitutional Amendment is necessary! Congress should start TODAY to work on ending expensive and unfair to our Country, Birthright Citizenship. They will have my Complete and Total Support!” he added.

Was this one of the worst Supreme Court rulings you’ve ever seen?

In its report, Just the News...


(Excerpt) Read more at westernjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: birthrightcitizen; illegaltruth; immigrationtruth

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 07/01/2026 5:07:13 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Do not allow ANY pregnant woman in the US. Deny ALL Visas.

Make ALL tourist birthing hotels terrorist organizations.

CLOSE them all.

Amazing that American dems want all babies in America ABORTED except for the foreign born.


2 posted on 07/01/2026 5:14:43 PM PDT by Singermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Cut off all aid for immigrants.


3 posted on 07/01/2026 5:17:34 PM PDT by Mr. Blond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Sean Davis, co-founder of The Federalist, suggested the following.

Several ways forward here given the choice of Roberts/Barrett to nullify the 14th Amendment and extra-constitutionally replace it with their own language:

1) Nullification. States issue birth certificates, and they can just stop issuing them to non-citizens. Roberts/Barrett can deal with the fallout and litigate each birth individually.

2) Pack the court. If Robert [sic] wants to be a politician who writes laws instead of a judge, then he can fight with 10 more unelected legislators in robes.

3) Deny entry to all pregnant foreigners.

4) Deny entry to all female foreigners.

5) Require sterilization of all foreign visitors prior to entry.

6) Dissolution of the Union. A nation which can’t even restrict who gets to be a citizen isn’t a nation.

7) Amend the Constitution. This is pointless, because once a judge decides he can rewrite the Constitution at will (as Roberts and Barrett did today), the actual text is meaningless. But this is what most GOP politicians gravitate towards because they are useless.

If you think all these options are not great, understand that that is what happens when unelected judges decide that they are in charge of the country and get to write its laws.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/federalist-co-founder-floats-dissolution-of-claim%20md-union-in-unhinged-post-after-trump-loses-birthright-citizenship-case/ar-AA26UUj0?ocid=BingNewsSerp


He wants to sterilize all foreign visitors, deny entry to all female foreigners, and deny entry to all pregnant foreigners.

Very Nazi ish.


4 posted on 07/01/2026 5:20:32 PM PDT by moviefan8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Blond

Pronto.


5 posted on 07/01/2026 5:20:58 PM PDT by No name given ( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Singermom

How about not letting any women in the US, unless they prove they are sterile.


6 posted on 07/01/2026 5:28:30 PM PDT by PhiloBedo (You gotta roll with the punches, and get with what's real..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: moviefan8

Works for me. Then maybe the SCOTUS can get it right.


7 posted on 07/01/2026 5:29:42 PM PDT by PhiloBedo (You gotta roll with the punches, and get with what's real..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: moviefan8

“Very Nazi ish”
Bullschit!
US CITIZENS are NOT a doormat!
These leaching aliens can go empty some other country’s bank account.


8 posted on 07/01/2026 5:32:00 PM PDT by doc maverick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, concluded, “Children born in the United States to parents unlawfully or temporarily present are ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States and are citizens at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause.”

Despite the fact the author of the amendment stated the contrary.

9 posted on 07/01/2026 5:32:56 PM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Good! The LibTards use the courts towards whatever end result they want that will further erode American FREEDOMS. Nice to see our side doing it for a change!

Thank You, Mr. President! MAGA!


10 posted on 07/01/2026 5:33:06 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have, 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Biden set the precedent and ignored SCOTUS.


11 posted on 07/01/2026 5:33:31 PM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
I once lived near a upscale housing development that contained birthing hotel activity. SEEING 3 PREGNANT CHINESE WOMEN WALKING TOGETHER wasn't just happenstance. I reported this (Obama was president at that time) and got a big YAWN on the other end of the phone.

SHUT IT DOWN and kick EVERY Chinese national OUT of our country. They are turning our universities into cesspools of anti-Americanism and WHEN THEIR "AMERICAN" CHILDREN GET JOBS here in tech or sensitive military contracts that is a recipe for the SUICIDE of our country.

12 posted on 07/01/2026 5:37:19 PM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moviefan8

Arrest and charge any foreigner who gives birth in the US with human trafficking of an American citizen.


13 posted on 07/01/2026 5:41:14 PM PDT by HYPOCRACY (There is no gravity. The earth just sucks. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: doc maverick

Keep the border locked down and turn them away at the entry point. Continue to deport all the illegals. They can take there children with them.


14 posted on 07/01/2026 5:42:09 PM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

Same for the Indians and Pakis. We don’t need to be educating third world trash who hates us. US Universities are for Americans.


15 posted on 07/01/2026 5:43:24 PM PDT by HYPOCRACY (There is no gravity. The earth just sucks. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The majority decision was all of the female justices with the traitor Roberts. Kavanaugh concurred with the result.


16 posted on 07/01/2026 5:45:23 PM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I’ve read elsewhere that the USSC decision was 5-4 with Justice Kavanaugh voting against but issuing a statement agreeing with the 5 in the majority as to ‘constitutionality’ but suggesting that he voted against because it was a ‘statutory matter’ for Congress to decide.


17 posted on 07/01/2026 5:48:38 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moviefan8

“Very Nazi ish.”

Fine.

You pull YOUR money from YOUR account and just fork it right on over to Achemed and MoHamIdiot.

What, no?

It’s a little different when YOU see YOUR balance race to 0.0.

You DON”T see it when it is filtered through “taxes.”

.


18 posted on 07/01/2026 5:49:40 PM PDT by TLI (ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Great news. Do what the rodents do when they lose a 2A case, just pass the same law again as Chicago did afewyears back.


19 posted on 07/01/2026 5:55:49 PM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Freedom is never free. It must be won rewon and jealously guarded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
I’ve read elsewhere that the USSC decision was 5-4 with Justice Kavanaugh voting against but issuing a statement agreeing with the 5 in the majority as to ‘constitutionality’ but suggesting that he voted against because it was a ‘statutory matter’ for Congress to decide.

I believe Kavenaugh didn't agree with the five on constitutionality.

He only claimed that Trump EO was invalid because there was an existing statute.

20 posted on 07/01/2026 5:57:27 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson