Posted on 06/10/2026 6:53:41 AM PDT by texas booster
Between the Islamists and the Throuples, they don't have a choice.
Considering the ‘throuples’ on the pronoun people side of the axis and the Islamists on the other side of their base, they don’t really have much choice, do they?
Gallup had a breakdown of a slight conservative shift on some moral issues that pollsters had been noticing over the last 5 years or so. People are suddenly less fond of gambling, having babies out of wedlock and teenagers having sex.
The differences in percentage points aren’t huge, but they reflect what I had long suspected that we were due for a more conservative decade, much like the 80s, but we didn’t properly get one by reason of various political and cultural insanities, and instead headed for more of a societal meltdown.
(Excerpt) Read more at frontpagemag.com ...
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
I suspect we’d get better Dem numbers for polygamy if they were adjusted for age. Still it just goes to show you that Bill Clinton was truly a man ahead of his time.
Apologies up front for this pic, but it was such great satire ... even if created by AI.
Ping out to the Daniel Greenfield Ping! list.
As always, please FReepmail me if you want on or off the esteemed Daniel Greenfield ping list.
Daniel Greenfield's website: The Sultan Knish blog
Shouldn’t that be 6 in 1?.....................
Since Democrats are the party that favors deviant sex, this doesn’t surprise me a bit. But what are “Throuples?”
Regards,
I was gonna say, 1 in 6 sounds low
Hah ...
The former is a bad idea, generally ... the latter is just gross.
“Since Democrats are the party that favors deviant sex, this doesn’t surprise me a bit.”
Me either....when The one and only Living God is absent from they’re life, they are capable of just about anything.
four sets of inlaws?
It’s np wonder the rich support democrats.
I would trade tolerance of polygamy for the pretend game that two men or two women can present themselves as a married couple. That is FAR more violent to the natural order of things.
None of my business.
The state should not officially recognize anything other than a marriage between a man XY, and a woman XX, period.
Divorce should not be made easy nor quick. These are all socially DYSFUNCTIONAL as the purpose of marriage is to build a family unit capable of having children and raising them. The purpose is not to “have fun” or to make a “social statement,” to “get attention.”
However, outside of that, what people do in their home is simply put, none of my business nor any consideration for hiring, firing, promoting, etc.
They can put on furry suits and have an orgy inside a tub of Jello for all I care.
But please don’t show me pictures of that mess on Monday at work and force me to attend some BS training over lunch, telling me how this is normal and force me to applaud them for their sexual fetish in the name of equality, inclusion and tolerance.
I have been wondering if we would ever see this as a result of normalizing dual income households if households will inevitable be forced to evolve to maintain the same standard of living.
Think threesomes but not from a perspective of a one-night stand. Think three people regularly engaging in sex with each other. The left every now and then makes it out to be not just about sex ... yeah right.
Ya Allah!
They’re ok with a lot of other sick stuff too.
Polygamy is self punishing.
L
Somebody should ask the democrats why did we have a conflict in Utah in the 1800’s again? Why did Utah have to make different laws to apply for statehood? Was it “Brigham Young” or “Bring them Young” (spelling?) and that entire conflict about?
So many questions.....
I seldom drink, but drank a scotch last night because my wife went on a full download mode of every detail of a “coffee” she had with a lady friend for three solid hours of non-stop verbal diarrhea.
But for the geniuses at Balvenie distillery, I would have had to get a backhoe started to hide the body.
Point being: who would want more than one wife?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.