Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 05/11/2026 9:39:25 AM PDT by MtnClimber
Fulton County, Georgia — the epicenter of so many lingering questions about the 2020 presidential election — has a new problem on its hands. On May 4, 2026, the Fulton County Board of Registration and Elections filed a 27-page motion to quash in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia asking a federal judge to quash a grand jury subpoena demanding the personal identifying information of thousands of county election workers and volunteers who helped administer the November 2020 General Election.
The original subpoena was issued under seal on April 17, 2026, by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of North Carolina under U.S. Attorney Dan Bishop. It was served on the board around April 20 and required production of records by May 5. It seeks names, positions/functions, residential addresses, email addresses, and personal telephone numbers for essentially the entire 2020 Fulton election workforce.
The categories are explicit and granular — they want the identities of mail-in ballot reviewers, Voter Review Panel members, mobile voting unit operators, ballot transporters, precinct managers, tabulator operators, risk-limiting audit participants, recount workers, and more. Of note, the records were not even directed to the grand jury in Atlanta; they were to be delivered to an out-of-district prosecutor and an FBI special agent.
Rather than comply quietly, the board filed its motion to quash publicly — without requesting it be sealed. That single procedural choice, which some see as very deliberate, turned an otherwise sealed grand jury matter into front-page news overnight. The board’s lawyers wasted no time in framing the subpoena in the most explosive terms possible, characterizing it as “the DOJ’s latest effort to target and harass the President’s perceived political enemies.” They called it “unprecedented and harassing,” “grossly overbroad,” “untethered to any reasonable need,” and an unconstitutional burden on the First Amendment rights of election workers that will chill future participation. They also leaned heavily on the five-year statute of limitations, arguing that any 2020-related federal crimes are now time-barred and the subpoena therefore cannot possibly lead to a valid prosecution, but those limitations can be “tolled” if the DOJ finds evidence of concealment or false statements, or an ongoing criminal conspiracy.
This is the same Fulton County that spent years insisting every 2020 question had been “debunked,” yet it has quietly admitted in state proceedings that roughly 130 tabulator tapes covering the chain of custody for approximately 315,000 early votes were never signed or properly documented. It is the same county whose State Farm Arena video still raises chain-of-custody questions for many observers. And it is the same jurisdiction that saw the FBI raid its clerk’s office and board warehouse on January 28, 2026, carting away roughly 700 boxes of original 2020 election materials as part of a criminal investigation.
The intense focus on the 2020 workforce is no accident. Former poll manager and current Fulton County Commissioner Bridget Thorne — a Republican who worked in that election on the ground and later became a whistleblower — has long raised red flags about how the county staffed its operations. Thorne has publicly detailed her surprise upon receiving an email from her regional manager notifying poll managers that Fulton would have “ACLU clerks” in every precinct on Election Day to assist with absentee ballot processing. She questioned that arrangement directly.
The county also relied heavily on temporary workers supplied by outside staffing agencies such as Happy Faces rather than experienced local staff. Many advance-voting sites were staffed almost exclusively by these temps, with minimal oversight from regular county election officials. Critics argue this outsourcing created opportunities for partisan influence, weakened training standards, and compromised chain-of-custody controls — precisely the kind of granular operational details a grand jury would want to examine through worker rosters, assignments, or even their testimony.
Thorne’s involvement went far beyond internal complaints. When the FBI showed up at her door as part of the federal probe, she cooperated fully and provided them with the sworn affidavit she filed back in 2020, and that helped secure the January 28, 2026 search warrant for the raid on Fulton’s election offices and warehouse.
Thorne is now the sitting Republican incumbent commissioner in District 1, and her cooperation with the DOJ recently prompted a jaw-dropping act of political retaliation printed right on the official May 19, 2026 Fulton County primary ballot. Under the State Democratic Party Questions section appears Question No. 5, which reads verbatim:
“Are you aware a sitting Republican Fulton County Board of Commissioner served as a witness, alongside other 2020 election conspiracy theorists, on the affidavit the FBI used to steal your private election information? ( ) Yes ( ) No”
Georgia law and long-standing practice allow political parties to place non-binding advisory questions — essentially straw polls — on primary ballots to gauge their voters’ sentiment on policy issues. These questions have no legal effect and appear only on that party’s partisan ballot. While parties have wide discretion, the Fulton County Democrats have used it aggressively here — explicitly naming the role of a sitting Republican commissioner (Thorne) and linking her to the FBI investigation. Similar pointed questions appear elsewhere on the same Democratic ballot. While unusual in their personal targeting, they are legally permissible as protected party speech.
The board’s motion, of course, casts all of this as baseless Trump-era retaliation. But for those who have followed Fulton’s track record — unsigned tapes, procedural anomalies, and repeated resistance to basic transparency — the subpoena looks less like harassment and more like the logical next step in a long-overdue accountability effort. Grand juries exist precisely to determine whether probable cause exists for indictment. Asking for the actual roster of people who touched ballots, tabulators, and transport chains is not a fishing expedition; it is standard investigative work when serious discrepancies have already been documented in public filings and state inquiries.
Importantly, the subpoena’s narrow focus on identifying election workers in no way limits the DOJ’s inquiry. Grand juries routinely examine a broad array of evidence, which likely includes other issues the FBI may have found in the thousands of boxes of original 2020 materials seized in the FBI raid. Issues such as unsigned tabulator tapes, chain-of-custody gaps documented on video, discrepancies between physical records and reported results, or higher-level administrative decisions can all be pursued independently of any issues relating to individual poll-worker conduct or temp-agency staffing questions.
Fulton’s unsealed filing may have been designed to generate sympathetic headlines, but it also guarantees that conservatives and election-integrity advocates will watch the court’s ruling closely. If the motion is denied and the data is produced, the grand jury will have the raw material to do its job. If granted, Americans will once again be told that the people who ran the election in the most scrutinized county in America simply cannot be examined too closely.
Either outcome is instructive. The left spent four years demanding “respect for the process” while simultaneously shielding Fulton from meaningful scrutiny. Now that the process is a federal grand jury operating under a different administration, the same officials suddenly discover that subpoenas are oppressive — while their own party uses the ballot box to target a whistleblower who cooperated with federal investigators. The irony is thicker than Atlanta traffic during rush hour.
Whatever the judge decides on the motion, the mere existence of this subpoena, and the Democratic Party’s clumsy attempt to punish a commissioner who told the truth, signals that some in Washington are finally treating 2020 Fulton questions as serious investigative leads rather than conspiracy theories. For conservatives who have long argued that sunlight is the best disinfectant for election administration, that is progress, whether Fulton likes it or not.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Their noncompliance is the same as an admission of guilt.
You would think the same people who claim Donald Trump is a threat to democracy would be the most eager to provide full transparency of the process.
Cockroaches will always resist the light.
You would think the same people who claim Donald Trump is a threat to democracy would be the most eager to provide full transparency of the process.
Meaning of course ....that
Rather than comply quietly, the board filed its motion to quash publicly — without requesting it be sealed. That single procedural choice, which some see as very deliberate, turned an otherwise sealed grand jury matter into front-page news overnight. The board’s lawyers wasted no time in framing the subpoena in the most explosive terms possible, characterizing it as “the DOJ’s latest effort to target and harass the President’s perceived political enemies.” They called it “unprecedented and harassing,” “grossly overbroad,” “untethered to any reasonable need,” and an unconstitutional burden on the First Amendment rights of election workers that will chill future participation.
2020 was the most rootin’ tootin’ clean and fair election there ever was by golly! I got a bill of sale for the Brooklyn Bridge from the very fella who assured me of that.
It’s obvious that federal investigators seek to interview the election workers as witnesses — they are not looking to indict 2000 poll workers. So basically the Fulton Election Board is concealing the identity of witnesses to their own crimesor those of their predecessors.
This is called Obstruction of Justice. Charge them.
Was thinking the same thing. If there was nothing to hide, they’d have no problem with “opening the books”.
Fulton county always at the center of fraud.
This is like one of those “walls closing in” moments. Hard to get cranked-up over this after so many disappointments.
If they got paid or where otherwise “employed” by goobermint, it’s public info.
Legal authorities certainly have rights to access it.
Hiding it is practically an admission of guilt.
They are so screwed. 😆
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.