Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia, China veto UN resolution aimed at reopening Strait of Hormuz, hours before Trump deadline
Fox News ^

Posted on 04/07/2026 2:32:37 PM PDT by USA-FRANCE

Russia and China vetoed a U.N. Security Council resolution Tuesday aimed at reopening the Strait of Hormuz, just hours before President Donald Trump’s deadline for Iran to cease threatening the key waterway.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: axisofevil; franceisgay; hormuz; inflatablefrog; putinisgay; un
Message from Jim Robinson:

Dear FRiends,

We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.

If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you,

Jim

China and Russia are truly vicious places. Shame on them.
1 posted on 04/07/2026 2:32:37 PM PDT by USA-FRANCE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE

LOL. What the hell did you expect?


2 posted on 04/07/2026 2:33:41 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (If I leave here, it’s because I’m tired of arguing with geriatric parrots wearing MAGA hats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE

You missed one. Russia, China, and Democrats.


3 posted on 04/07/2026 2:33:54 PM PDT by Eastern Shore Virginian (Yea, I sometimes gild the lily.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE

It’s just a resolution...no teeth...


4 posted on 04/07/2026 2:33:59 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE

The axis of evil protects its own.


5 posted on 04/07/2026 2:34:11 PM PDT by Magnum44 (...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE

Did the DEI Pope have a say?


6 posted on 04/07/2026 2:36:13 PM PDT by Just mythoughts (Matthew 24:32 Now learn a parable of the fig tree; When his branch is yet tender, )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE

Who in their right mind would want it closed. Screw those murderous, sloppy bioengineering bat bioweapon chinkees


7 posted on 04/07/2026 2:38:42 PM PDT by MarlonRando
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE
From the article -- and beyond the headline:

"After Russia, China and France, all veto-wielding countries on the 15-member Security Council, expressed opposition to approving the use of force, the resolution was revised to eliminate all references to offensive action. It would have authorized only 'all defensive means necessary.' A vote had been expected on Saturday.

"But instead, the resolution was further weakened to eliminate any reference to Security Council authorization — which is an order for action — and limit its provisions to the Strait of Hormuz. Previous drafts had included adjacent waters."

No matter how one slices this PR pie, there was no filling in it. And won't be the next time around either.
8 posted on 04/07/2026 2:41:11 PM PDT by Worldtraveler once upon a time (Degrow government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE

9 posted on 04/07/2026 2:44:33 PM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarlonRando
Who in their right mind would want it closed.

Apparently the Trump administration did.

10 posted on 04/07/2026 2:45:08 PM PDT by Alberta's Child (If I leave here, it’s because I’m tired of arguing with geriatric parrots wearing MAGA hats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE

and the left are siding with Russia, who ever thought that they would side with Putin


11 posted on 04/07/2026 2:46:09 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE
"It would have authorized only 'all defensive means necessary.'"

WTF is that supposed to mean?
12 posted on 04/07/2026 3:02:09 PM PDT by equaviator (Nobody's perfect. That's why they put pencils on erasers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

There is an isthumus betwwen the persian gulf and the sea of oman. it is about 700 feet wide at a place called maksar, and apparently is occupied by a campground at ~70 feet above sea level at its highest point. if the maps are correct, why not just quickly blast a sea level water passageway through the isthumus at this point to allow ships to pass, at sea level without locks, entirely within the territory of oman?

(since this seems like an obvious solution then i imagine that there is a good reason that this has not been done... i just do not know what that reason is...)


13 posted on 04/07/2026 3:13:18 PM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE

I can see Russia going with the Veto . More oil sales at higher prices for them. But China? With all that oil that goes to them through that strait? Is it just because they consider opposition to the United States a higher priority? In the long run having that strait shut down helps the world because it denies Islamic countries profits from oil.


14 posted on 04/07/2026 3:18:20 PM PDT by Nateman (Democrats did not strive for fraud friendly voting merely to continue honest elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USA-FRANCE

Just one more reason that Trump should expel every U.N. Representative from U.S. soil and burn the U.N. building to the ground.


15 posted on 04/07/2026 3:30:54 PM PDT by TonyM (Score Event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveH

since my previous post, my shaky memory has reminded me that one possible reason that a hormuz bypass canal has not yet been proposed is that ships transiting it would still be vulnerable to missile attacks from iran. that sounds reasonable, but the proposal would still have the advantage of forcing iran to be the aggressor outside of hormuz, while allowing other ME nations to control iranian prosperity via shutting down hormuz to iranian traffic, and preventing exposure of US forces to overt combat and loss of life.

ideally, also, a relatively peaceful construction project would have an appeal to trump over a protracted ME war.


16 posted on 04/07/2026 4:03:47 PM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Eastern Shore Virginian

This 1000%


17 posted on 04/07/2026 5:45:56 PM PDT by bantam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson