assumes that there is a fixed amount of wealth in the world.
"I beg to differ. It's just no one's worked it right."
"And I'd bet everything you earn it's true."
Posted on 03/21/2026 8:51:38 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Early this year, we learned that Elon Musk may become the first trillionaire in world history.
My friends on the left of the political spectrum have been fuming about this story as the ultimate example of the rich getting richer and the poor getting crumbs.
When I appeared on "Real Time with Bill Maher" not long ago, Bill questioned me about the prospect of Musk becoming a trillionaire. "Isn't that excessive?" he asked.
Similar questions about the super wealthy have been asked throughout American history. The first multimillionaire, John Jacob Astor, amassed his fortune in the fur trade and in Manhattan real estate in the first half of the 19th century.
The first billionaire in America was John D. Rockefeller -- arguably America's greatest business mind. As the owner of Standard Oil in the early 20th century, he brought access to cheap energy to the masses. Yet the government sued him and broke up his company.
The first centibillionaire -- someone with a net worth of $100 billion -- in America was Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft in the 1970s and supplier of the world's first dominant computer operating system. The government sued him too, as the price of computer software fell by 90%.
In 1994, Jeff Bezos founded Amazon and went on to become the second centibillionaire by selling and delivering things to Americans online at very low prices.
Progressives are horrified by the news of billionaires and the imminent arrival of trillionaires. Calls for imposing a steeply progressive wealth tax on billionaires (and trillionaires) are getting louder every day.
Notice that all the men of great wealth, and almost all of America's other super wealthy throughout history -- the Vanderbilts, J.P. Morgans, Andrew Carnegies and Henry Fords -- built spectacularly successful companies out of nothing, and even invented whole new industries.
They didn't inherit the money. They earned it themselves. Yet still they are disparaged as robber barons. They revolutionized and democratized energy production, railroads, cars, steel production and financial services.
Now the new multibillionaire class is making the digital age accessible to everyone. It's no accident that we all have access to computers, AI, search engines, smartphones, MRIs and the like. Even the poorest among us have access to more goods and services.
Thanks to the genius of people like Musk, in a few years each of us will have our own robot who will do our bidding: Make the bed, fix our dinner, drive us to the movies, rake the leaves, and buy the groceries.
One of the most influential economic studies of modern times came from economist William Nordhaus, who estimated that consumers capture about 95% of the economic benefits from innovation -- the social "surplus" -- while inventors and entrepreneurs capture less than 5%.
In other words, for every billion dollars that Musk earns from his satellites and electric vehicles, everyone else in society is a combined $20 billion richer over time. Michael Jordan, Paul McCartney and Taylor Swift are billionaires, but the value of the joy they have brought to the citizens of the world is in the multiple hundreds of billions of dollars.
So just who owes whom money?
Someone show me any social welfare government program in American history that produces those kinds of benefits to mankind. Even Gates has a $100 billion charitable foundation, but the impact of its gifts and initiatives is dwarfed by the value added by his creation of Microsoft.
Here's another way to think about it: Who do you think would put a trillion dollars to better use: Musk or the blowhards in Congress and bureaucrats in Washington? The question answers itself.
JEALOUSY IS A TERRIBLE MISTRESS
I hope that Musk will pay the TSA salaries. (I do not admire TSA though.) I just want to see the Democrats go off a cliff.
Excessive is having a POS like Adam Schiff toss around billions of other people’s money like so much trash.
At the peak of his wealth, Rockefeller was an adjusted trillionaire. It’s not entirely new.
Me being rich doesn’t make someone else poor, any more than me having a fast car makes their car slow.
The very notion of “wealth inequality” is nonsense. It assumes that there is a fixed amount of wealth in the world. Wealth is created out of thin air by those who risk and innovate.
If you want wealth then create it. In the digital world it has never been easier.
Bezoz may be a dork, but he’s my favorite dork.
AMZ has been part of my life since the day Jeff started it.. I lived in Sandpoint ID then and my. son called: “Mom, there’s this grnew thing called a computer”:. And I bought one the next day. Friends came from miles around and all went out to buy one.......How much have I spent at Amazon? Far, FAR less than I would have spent for the same stuff at a store.
My latest deals are food. Yes, food, Glorious Food. Terrific brand names for healthful stuff that arrives before breakfast and saves $$$$. Organic Morning O’s Honey Nut will be breakfast tomorrow. Daisy Cat is happy with all kinds of variety in cat cans she wasn’t getting before.
Am I jealous that Bezos found that smart-but-hookerish woman he married when I was available? Nah, none of us on FR could put up with that level of showmanship..
I wouldn’t mind, but Elon:
1. Is one of the driving forces for continued and more H-1B visas and more Green Cards, which have destroyed Americans in the STEM fields. Not metaphorically. Not theoretically. Really Destroying Lives.
2. Is the biggest bastard factory in American history, not giving a rat’s ass if his throngs of children from his harem have a dedicated in-person father;
3. Makes promises he can never keep - he’s a modern P.T. Barnum. Mind you, he has an army of people who try to deliver on 1/10th his promises, and good progress comes from that. But trust a single thing he says? NOPE!
"I beg to differ. It's just no one's worked it right."
"And I'd bet everything you earn it's true."
Your green eyes are so cute...
The left is oblivious to the creation of new wealth. They live by the thought that there is a limited amount of wealth in the world, and everyone would be rich if it were to be divided equally among all. In fact, wealth is not a gift from God, it’s the product of labor and invention. Wealth is created from nothing, when the product labor and resources is worth more than the cost of producing it. That’s true for everything from mining diamonds to building spaceships. There’s no limit to the amount of wealth that can be created, as long as there is incentive to create it. Wealth is destroyed when the incentive is removed. It’s noteworthy that many of the richest people listed got wealthy by making desired products less expensive and more reliable. Gates - computers, Rockefeller - gasoline, Musk - rocket ships, etc.
What is most frustrating about these envious idiots is they think Musk has a “counting house” where he sits like Scrooge McDuck counting his gold coins.
They don’t realize that if he had to liquidate 5% of his wealth every year, thousands would lose their jobs and millions would see the hit in their retirement accounts.
Plus they don’t seem to realize that a wealth tax is unconstitutional.
These people are lazy and greedy.
Yossie invented the grievance but never got paid for it.
He also isn’t investing in fusion. I hope he’s wrong about that one.
Liberals just can’t stand to see an African American make it on his own.
I couldn’t help but notice that neither of you two came up with any counter-arguments for any of my points.
So, do you:
1. Love Diwali but hate Christmas? Because now in my town in the Silicon Valley, Diwali is celebrated more than Christmas, thanks to all the Indian H-1Bs that Elon loves. (And that pad his bottom line.)
And Americans have been flushed out, it’s impossible to get a job, because Indians - who now absolutely control the semiconductor industry - only hire their own. Does that put a smile on your face?
2. Are you willing to give your daughters up to be members of Elon’s harem, so your grandsons and granddaughters can become one of Elon’s many, many bastard children? Or is it all just really cool, because it’s your hero Elon, and maybe there’s good money in it?
3. Or do you just love his promises, because a fraction of them do get realized, maybe, years or close to a decade after he promises them? After you paid him?
Look, I love self-landing rockets, I want DOGE cuts, and I was interested in electric cars, until the makers of them insisted the rest of us had to pay for them via huge subsidies.
But “the rise of the Tech Bros”? I’ve seen the mayhem they created here in the Silicon Valley: the flushing out of American values, and the literal flushing out of Americans.
The juice isn’t worth the squeeze.
Your post is just balderdascious drivel
John Jacob Astor, America’s first plutocrat, added immensely to his fortune by trafficking opium in China.
Elon Musk is already one of America’s greatest industrialists.
He outshines all of those on which the article raises up in comparison
Buy Tesla while it’s cheap
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.