Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 02/05/2026 7:06:07 PM PST by Angelino97
Here we go again.
President Donald Trump says he wants to make a deal with Iran and avoid war. And he’s sending negotiators to Oman for talks with Iranian diplomats on Friday. Sound familiar?
Ahead of scheduled U.S.–Iranian talks in Oman last June, Israel launched a surprise attack on Iran, instigating a war that Trump later briefly joined with a bombing raid on Tehran’s main nuclear facilities.
Not quite eight months later, the world anxiously waits to see if recent history will repeat itself, this time with America leading the charge.
Israel, of course, is worried that Trump won’t attack. “It’s really the Israelis who want a strike,” a U.S. official told Axios. “The president is just not there.” If Trump strikes Iran rather than negotiating a deal, that will mean Israel got its way.
If you pay close attention to Mideast issues—or if you’re just a sentient human being—the Axios reporting should come as no surprise. Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been pushing a U.S. war on Iran for decades, and until Trump’s second term, American presidents had told him thanks, but no thanks.
But even Trump didn’t give Netanyahu everything he wanted in June, authorizing a highly limited attack and then getting Iran and Israel to cease fire.
It could’ve been worse, much worse—and it likely will be if Trump strikes again. This time, judging from the buildup of assets in the Persian Gulf region, the Trump administration appears to be planning large-scale strikes. Moreover, experts have assessed for months that the Iranian government sees a need to hit back harder if the U.S. and Israel attack again, to restore deterrence. It looks like the experts are right. “They should know that if they start a war this time, it will be a regional war,” Iran’s supreme leader said on Sunday.
Sounds bad, but you can’t exactly blame Tehran for threatening to set the Middle East ablaze. Trump has demonstrated a strong preference for military action to be quick and achieve specific objectives so he can avoid American casualties and long, chaotic wars. The Iranians know this, and their provocative rhetoric is meant to prevent another attack on their country, not to antagonize Washington.
But Tehran’s threats are credible. Iran has ramped up its manufacture of ballistic missiles since the June war (though questions persist about how many missile launchers are ready to fire them). And the Islamic Republic may have no choice but to assume that any future attack poses an existential threat, given the escalating rhetorical belligerence of Israel and its American supporters.
As Tehran suppressed mass protests last month, pro-Israel voices like Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) intensified their pressure on Trump to topple the Iranian regime. “Make Iran Great Again,” became a favorite catchphrase of Graham, who never misses a chance to coopt the MAGA movement. The president seemed on the verge of giving the war hawks what they wanted, but he pulled back.
Trump judged that the U.S. military wasn’t prepared to intercept large-scale retaliation against Israel, Arab partners, and American forces in the region. So he sent an “armada” to the Middle East, including the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier and its strike group. But by the time the assets arrived, Iran had squashed the protests, and it was even less clear than before what U.S. strikes could achieve.
Trump had another good reason to think twice: Striking Iran doesn’t pass the cost–benefit test for America. Simply put, the American people don’t stand to benefit from another war of choice in the Middle East, and the Iraq War showed how costly such a war can be.
The Iranian opposition too is unlikely to benefit from U.S. strikes. “Another Israeli or U.S. attack out of the blue risks helping the Iranian regime politically by enabling it to appeal to patriotic and nationalist sentiment,” writes Paul Pillar, former national intelligence officer for the Near East and South Asia, in Responsible Statecraft. A war on Iran could also harm the protesters by, well, killing a lot of them and unleashing mayhem.
There’s no way around it: The looming U.S. war on Iran, if it occurs, probably won’t serve the interests of America or anti-government Iranians. But it would serve the interests of Israel.
Like America, Israel wants to prevent the Islamic Republic from developing nuclear weapons, but it perceives an additional interest: regime change or state collapse in Iran. American interests can be achieved via diplomacy—and indeed were achieved under the Iran nuclear deal that Trump exited in 2018—but Israel sees U.S. diplomacy with Iran as threatening.
The divergence of interests makes sense. Just look at a map and any list ranking the world powers. A middle power on the other side of the world, Iran poses no military threat to America; for Israel, it’s the chief adversary. And Netanyahu tends to trust only one tool for dealing with regional foes: brute force.
But Iran’s too big a dog for Israel to put down without help from its superpower patron. A lot of help. Israel would have suffered catastrophic damage last June had the U.S. not shielded it from Iranian missiles, and a successful regime change would require America to do the heavy lifting. Trump’s limited strikes on Iran were a poor alternative to negotiations, but at least they targeted Tehran’s nuclear program rather than its regime. Similarly, his military raid in Venezuela last month achieved U.S. interests, albeit ones that diplomacy could have achieved with less risk. And while I oppose Trump’s push to acquire Greenland, I concede that doing so would bring strategic benefits for America (though outweighed, in my analysis, by the costs).
But an attack on Iran’s regime is a very different animal. Trump faces a clear choice: Launch another war for Israel or make peace for America. His choice is a test case for commentators trying to make sense of this administration: Does Trump’s Iran policy serve America or a foreign nation?
I predict Trump attacks by mid-February. I hope he proves me wrong.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Oh...more of this nonsense.
how many damn stupid “it’s the jooooooooooos” effin articles have you posted here?
so ignorant it hurts
This article is nutty.
Iran has been at war against the US since the Islamist regime was put in power by Jimmy Carter in 1979. Iran is our deadly enemy.
Some people--such as, apparently, Andrew Day, whoever he is--just can't stand the Jee-ooz, and also can't stop talking about it.
This is ridiculous. Only a TDS anti semite would post this.
The article's main thesis is not "It's the Joooooooos," but rather that Israel has long pressured the U.S. to take out Iran, and is currently pressuring Trump to do so.
What about that isn't true?
Back in 2002, Netanyahu was lobbying the U.S. to attack Iraq. (Thanks, Bibi!) And after the Iraq War, Israel next wanted us to take out Iran.
These are simple facts.
If you're only response is "It's the Jooooooooos" than you really haven't any response.
Nuts.
Trump was not hoodwinked into attacking Iran by Israel.
Trump was planning with Netanyahu for many months in advance all the targets and staging.
This is not the Israeli tail wagging Trump. To say so ignores everything we know about Trump.
Do YOU believe Trump is an Israeli stooge? Or are you just finding any way to foment anti-Jew sentiment?
Israel wants to unload the radical muslims onto us expendable goyim
Israeli lawmakers urge the West to accept refugees from Gaza, in WSJ op-ed
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4197820/posts
Netanyahu Says He Rejects Donald Trump’s Remarks Against Muslims
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3370369/posts
mitchjackson1972
Since Nov 5, 2025
Hardspunned, is that you?
The jihadi regime in Iran has killed and wounded thousands of American servicemen since the Islamic revolution began in 1979, and they tried to assassinate Trump before the 2024 election. Yet you nutcases think it’s all about Israel and Jews. Give it a rest.
My response isn’t it’s the Jews, my response is that you are a tiresome bore.
Sorry, was that meant to disprove the valid links to actual news posted from other users here, because you got an F on your report if so
I don’t follow.
And your tagline is disconcerting.
So I don’t understand your points, perspective, or much of anything yet.
Why would this guy even bother to write an article?
“Trump’s limited strikes on Iran were a 🤡poor alternative to negotiations,🤡 but at least they targeted Tehran’s nuclear program rather than its regime. Similarly, his military raid in Venezuela last month achieved U.S. interests, albeit ones that😩 diplomacy could have achieved with less risk😓” He spent too much time in library getting PhD; watched “negotiations” do nothing for decades.
Then Israel attacked Iran. I think Bibi lied when he publicly claimed that Trump had secretly planned the attack with Israel, negotiating in bad faith with Iran to give them into a false sense of security.
Bibi essentially called Trump a liar, saying that Trump negotiates in bad faith. I say Bibi is the liar, Trump negotiated in good faith.
Bibi's lie painted Trump into a corner. If Trump contradicted Bibi, it would have isolated Israel and angered the Israel lobby.
It would also have required punishment from the U.S. (a cutoff in aid?), absent which Trump would have appeared weak before Israel. You can't call out Israel for lying about you, and for sabotaging your talks, without doing something about it.
But if Trump agreed with Bibi, it would weaken the U.S. position globally. In future, any nation negotiating with the U.S. would recall that the U.S. sometimes fakes a negotiation.
Trump chose this latter path.
Now, Trump is again negotiating with Iran. But considering Bibi's past statement, how likely are the Iranian to believe anything Trump says?
There can be no negotiations for America, any opponent knows they just have to wait for Democrats to get back in power and they will be richly rewarded.
Iran is absolutely no threat to citizens in this country. There is no reason whatsoever for us to go to war with Iran.
“ think that last year, Trump was negotiating with Iran in good faith.
Then Israel attacked Iran”
That is false.
Many news sources discussed the deep coordination in advance. There were coordinated cover stories Trump and Netanyahu invented to keep the Iranians thinking the attack wouldn’t come ON EXACTLY THE DAY TRUMP PROMISED.
You live with your head buried so far up your backside you make up things that never happened just to indict a Jew.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.