Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top secret war document reveals China would crush the US and 'destroy' the world's largest aircraft carrier
The Daily Mail ^ | 12/10/2025 | Nick Allen

Posted on 12/10/2025 7:12:52 PM PST by thegagline

The United States would suffer a devasting defeat and lose its biggest aircraft carrier if it tried to stop China invading Taiwan, according to a top secret Pentagon report.

War games showed the U.S. would be overwhelmed by China's arsenal of around 600 hypersonic weapons, along with missiles and nuclear submarines.

The grim assessment, revealed by the New York Times, confirmed the conclusions of previous war games, but it also highlighted wider concerns about the future direction of the U.S. military and its continued reliance on outdated methods. ***

Ships like the $13 billion USS Gerald R. Ford - the largest aircraft carrier in the world - were often destroyed in scenarios gamed out for a U.S. defense of Taiwan.

*** The war in Ukraine has shown the fading power of traditional weapons including tanks, they will suggest.

The latest bombshell for the Pentagon comes after President Xi Jinping ordered his generals to be prepared for a possible invasion of Taiwan as early as 2027. ***

With the U.S. set to defend Taiwan, China could launch cyber attacks against American power and water networks. *** Secretary of War Pete Hegseth has previously said that 'we lose every time' in Pentagon simulations of a Taiwan conflict

Earlier this year, he said China is 'rehearsing for the real deal' and added: 'We are not going to sugarcoat it, the threat China poses is real and it could be imminent.'

*** A total of 26 war games scenarios were played out by CSIS.

In the worst-case scenario, busting the blockade cost the U.S. 21,000 casualties, 45 ships, an aircraft carrier, two submarines and over 1,000 aircraft.

China suffered 13,000 casualties and lost 42 submarines, nearly 100 ships and around 1,000 aircraft. ***

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: China; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 50centarmy; anonymoussource; bemorelikechina; chicoms; chicomtrolls; china; chinahashealthcare; chinaisnotourenemy; chinesearesmarter; concerntroll; concerntrolling; concerntrolls; dailywail; fiftycentarmy; frracists; hegemony; hollow; ibtz; nickallen; notsecretanymore; redchina; socialismworks; tds; tiptopsecret; usnavy; zot

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last
The COVID “crisis,” TikTok, the free flow of fentany, transgender Maoism, unrelenting purchases of land near military bases, DEI, the incessant cyber attacks on our energy infrastructure, water, and pipelines (see Volt Typhoon), our compromised leadership (mass migration, giving China access to Nvidia’s H200 chips, allowing 600,000 Chinese “students” into our universities etc) China is already on the road to winning the war.
1 posted on 12/10/2025 7:12:52 PM PST by thegagline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thegagline

And would the world come to our rescue??


2 posted on 12/10/2025 7:15:08 PM PST by airborne (Thank you Rush for helping me find FreeRepublic! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

I know they’re saying China has a lot of weapons. But frankly, the source for the weapons type and amount is coming straight from the Chinese. And they wouldn’t lie, would they?

CC


3 posted on 12/10/2025 7:16:05 PM PST by Celtic Conservative (Heghlu'meH QaQ jajvam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

Can we tow Taiwan further from China? /Hank Johnson


4 posted on 12/10/2025 7:17:02 PM PST by gundog (The ends justify the mean tweets. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

Not by destroying our aircraft carriers when they can’t even float ONE of theirs. They are a copycat thieving deceptive population of grifters. Remember melamine? And they think they can get revenge on their own Opium addiction which led to a “Boxer Rebellion” which failed from insistence on taels of silver to balance the opium vs. tea trade for the then English Empire.

A lot more to this story then simply listing their attempts. The right person/people can dismantle their crap with proper focus and determination. The world is not their oyster, their population is one of oysters.

See: Gordon Chang. The paper wall panel and fakirism that is China’s “economy”. Paper burns well, just as tungsten does not sell as “gold”..


5 posted on 12/10/2025 7:18:42 PM PST by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Conservative

“China suffered 13,000 casualties and lost 42 submarines, nearly 100 ships and around 1,000 aircraft ....and one big F’n Dam.


6 posted on 12/10/2025 7:19:06 PM PST by wetgundog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

Is this from War thunder?


7 posted on 12/10/2025 7:19:23 PM PST by Karliner (Heb 4:12 Rom 8:28 Rev 3, "...This is the end of the beginning." Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gundog
Can we tow Taiwan further from China? /Hank Johnson

Might tip over if we did. 🤡

8 posted on 12/10/2025 7:19:53 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (I have no answers. Only questions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

What would happen then? That would be the end of China’s trade with the US, Japan, and probably the rest of the Anglosphere as well as Europe. That would mean utter economic ruin for them.


9 posted on 12/10/2025 7:21:43 PM PST by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Conservative

Yes-— a “Top Secret” Pentagon report.... which isn’t either one of the description. No puzzlement to the “you rikee speechee” crap coming out of Xi-land. In fact, Xi may no longer be around, even if he’s photo’d. The number one weakness of their “system”-— hordes of deceptive deviant wannabeew within their military hierarchy alone. Mao was a learning curve they never beat, apparently.

People are bugs in that “society”— and worth even less unless they are food which they were in the not too distant past.

Just learning about the former head of the Sturmabteilung’s ouster from the SA by Hitler- Stennes. He escaped to be military advisor to Chiang Kai Chek (amazing a Nazi German as Chiang’s aide de camp).


10 posted on 12/10/2025 7:24:26 PM PST by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

“In the worst-case scenario, busting the blockade cost the U.S. 21,000 casualties, 45 ships, an aircraft carrier, two submarines and over 1,000 aircraft.

China suffered 13,000 casualties and lost 42 submarines, nearly 100 ships and around 1,000 aircraft. ***”

But the blockade was busted and China defeated.

Even in the worst case scenario.


11 posted on 12/10/2025 7:25:17 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

12 posted on 12/10/2025 7:25:39 PM PST by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

Don’t think it’s too Top Secret if the Daily Mail has it.


13 posted on 12/10/2025 7:28:41 PM PST by VanShuyten ("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

We only defeated Imperial Japan because it was a relatively small country and an island that could be easily blockaded.

China would be a much tougher nut to crack.

Sometimes I wonder if we should have been more accomodating to Imperial Japan, before the hardliners, like Tojo, took control of the government. But hindsight is 20/20.

But even during the war, it was pretty much accepted that ultimately Mao would prevail over Chiang Kai-Shek.


14 posted on 12/10/2025 7:29:03 PM PST by dfwgator ("I am Charlie Kirk!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gundog
Can we tow Taiwan further from China? /Hank Johnson

LOL

15 posted on 12/10/2025 7:30:13 PM PST by thegagline (Sic semper tyrannis! Trump & Vance, 2024! (Formerly) Goldwater & Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

That was the plan. Put the US too deep in debt to build infrastructure, while build up China.

The 20th century was about allowing the socialist systems compete against each other to see who could win and China beat them all.


16 posted on 12/10/2025 7:31:28 PM PST by Jonty30 (The next time I go to Communion, I think I will dip the wafer into the wine to improve the flavour.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegagline
Who gave the New York Times and the Daily Mail a "top secret Pentagon report"?!?

Are such reports now the "Surprise" in a Cracker Jack box?


17 posted on 12/10/2025 7:34:19 PM PST by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegagline
Secretary of War Pete Hegseth has previously said that 'we lose every time' in Pentagon simulations of a Taiwan conflict

Lets explore this, shall we?

Purely from a theoretical perspective, if the simulation showed that we WIN every time, that would mean less basis for more money for weapons, soldiers, R&D, etc.

This, hypothetically of course, would mean that the Pentagon has an incentive to create simulation where they LOSE.

Again…this is purely hypothetical. No government agency would rig a test to get more money. That would be unprecedented.

Do I really need the /sarc?

18 posted on 12/10/2025 7:34:27 PM PST by DoodleBob (Gravity's waiting period is about 9.8 m/s²)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

The Ukes have shown that surface drones beat large surface ships of all kinds.

Add in supersonic missiles and there is no further reason to build Capital Ships.


19 posted on 12/10/2025 7:38:03 PM PST by Paladin2 (YMMV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Thank God our carriers weren’t at Pearl on December 7th.


20 posted on 12/10/2025 7:39:33 PM PST by dfwgator ("I am Charlie Kirk!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson