Posted on 11/03/2025 5:27:59 PM PST by xxqqzz
One week after King Charles III initiated the formal process to remove the style, titles and honors of Prince Andrew, his brother's name was notably missing from the royal website.
Buckingham Palace confirmed the former prince will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, in a statement published Oct. 30.
"His lease on Royal Lodge has, to date, provided him with legal protection to continue in residence," according to the statement. "Formal notice has now been served to surrender the lease, and he will move to alternative private accommodation."
Prince Andrew's biography was removed from the royal website after King Charles III initiated the process to strip his brother of honors and titles.
The palace said the censures "are deemed necessary, notwithstanding the fact that he continues to deny the allegations against him."
By Monday, Nov. 3, Andrew's inclusion on the website appeared to be completely removed. People magazine reported that the former royal's biography once included notes on his service in the Royal Navy, in addition to his history as the third child of Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Is Randy Andy still Randy?
He’s the Andrew formerly known as Prince.
Charles does not impress me.
He seems petty and arrogant. But that’s just a perception.
Didn’t he at one point publically abdicate his right to the thrown?
Andrew has too much of an inner
“Caligua” to make a good leader over an extended period.
He seems extremely self centered and pompous, even for a Prince.
“It’s great to be King”! ( Mel Brooks for those of a certain age)
I think Charles has done well as King, especially considering his health issues.
His mother was a very hard act to follow, but I have hopes that William will do very well.
There is someone here at FR who knows King Charles and I think has served with him. Hopefully he will chime in here.
I truly think he wronged his mother by doing this.
That’s juts nuts, nvts, nuts.
just
> I think Charles has done well as King… <
I respectfully disagree. Charles has said nothing about the horrific Muslim grooming gangs that have raped English girls. And nothing about the waves of illegal immigrants that will eventually bring his country down.
I get that the British monarch reigns, but does not rule.
But if a king dare not speak about such serious issues, then what good is a king?
That’s naturalman1975. He posts infrequently these days, and I believe he is properly circumspect in his comments now that his friend is actually the King.
Why would he also this to Andrew? What’s the back story?
To the contrary, this occasion highlights a show of strength on the part of King Charles, part and a glimmer of integrity that even his late mother refrained from expressing.
Shakespeare wrote about these people like a depraved soap opera in the Elizabethan era. Elizabeth I
Why anyone thinks they are any different now, blood related or not, is beyond my comprehension
What impact would this ever have to anyone? England has turned into a complete mess with its own police force and government turning on its own population. The English really need to cull the herds and political scum currently running roughshod over them or they are done as a nation.
Princess Diana fan here.
And I pray for full justice for all victims of Epstein.
Yes, it was naturalman. I hope he is still posting here and will post again.
He’s not permitted to enter political issues in a public way.
He stands as a cultural and historical symbol, an ‘embodiment’. He’s not a politician.
At any rate, what we may think about this doesn’t matter at all. The majority of the Brits seem to want to keep the monarchy. If they didn’t, the monarchy would have been done away with, and the Royals would have folded their tents and slipped away.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.