Skip to comments.
'He’s micro-managing phenomenally': How Trump grabbed all the levers in Washington
Politico ^
| 10/19/2025 06:55 AM EDT
| Brendan Bordelon, Amanda Chu and Caitlin Oprysko
Posted on 10/19/2025 6:01:21 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
The president's one-man-show approach to policy has sidelined Congress, agencies — and a whole K Street culture.
Intel Corp. looked like a winner in the Washington lobbying game at the start of 2025.
The federal government was set to funnel more than $10 billion to the American microchip giant, thanks to a long influence campaign by the company’s executives and hired Washington hands, who spent three painstaking years lobbying Congress, federal agencies and White House advisers.
Just a few months later, when a political controversy over the CEO’s links to Chinese companies put Intel’s deal with Washington in jeopardy, the whole drama was resolved in two weeks. And this time, the company’s path ran through just one person: President Donald Trump.
The sharp change in how Intel navigated Washington is being replicated across industries in Trump’s second term — by pharmaceutical companies cutting drug pricing deals with the White House, tech giants hoping to sell regulated equipment to China and energy firms that want looser environmental and permitting restrictions.
After decades of revolving-door culture, Washington is grappling with a new normal for how influence works in the capital. POLITICO spoke with several dozen lobbyists, industry officials and public relations professionals who revealed a transformation far more disruptive than the
typical churn that comes with a new administration.
In Trump 2.0, American policy influence has shifted from its previous channels — agency officials, top lawmakers and staffers on key congressional committees — to a new reality where change comes suddenly from the top.
The president and a handful of lieutenants have seized full control over policies once considered the remit of Congress and experts at agencies, including hyperspecific issues like tariff rates, high-skilled visa fees and funding freezes. Trump’s gravitational pull has forced CEOs to act as their companies’ top lobbyists, plying the president with gifts...
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: amandachu; brendanbordelon; caitlinoprysko; dc; politico; pollutico; trump
I voted for this.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Thank you for posting this thread.
2
posted on
10/19/2025 6:11:00 PM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
(Sailing the Sea of Ignorance on a Ship named Free Republic)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
"experts at agencies" It seems to me that those experts almost never have any idea how to do their job. It shouldn't even be a surprise that some real estate guy from NYC can run rings around the "experts at agencies".
3
posted on
10/19/2025 6:13:03 PM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(Democrats seek power through cheating and assassination. They are sociopaths. They just want power.)
To: UCANSEE2
Especially coming from a rabid leftist Politico. Amazing.
4
posted on
10/19/2025 6:21:47 PM PDT
by
Fungi
To: E. Pluribus Unum
"The party's over. I'm going to clean up Washington."
President-elect Donald Trump
2016
5
posted on
10/19/2025 6:26:23 PM PDT
by
Savage Beast
("Break free from the temptations and shackles of this world." Erika Kirk, September 21, 2025)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Personally? I think President Trump is doing just fine.
The FECKLESS Quisling RINOS in Congress are the PROBLEM; have always been, will always be!
6
posted on
10/19/2025 6:32:33 PM PDT
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have, 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
'He’s micro-managing phenomenally'Jimmy Carter personally set the White House tennis court schedule.
7
posted on
10/19/2025 6:41:42 PM PDT
by
Hebrews 11:6
(“…all who were appointed for eternal life believed.” Acts 13:48)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
President Kamala could work tirelessly like this for the American people.
Sure.
...BWAHAHAHAHA
There are not enough words in the English language for what an incompetent, abject loser she is, compared to him.
8
posted on
10/19/2025 6:46:33 PM PDT
by
simpson96
To: ClearCase_guy
And exactly why another 1,000,000 Fed leeches need to get fired.
Start with ‘Education’ as no such word is in the Constitution.
9
posted on
10/19/2025 6:47:39 PM PDT
by
quantim
(Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
FECKLESS Quisling RINOS Truer words were never said.
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Cannot disagree even the slightest with your comment. Been saying same or similar for decades - why PDJT is such a damn RUSH to watch!
To: E. Pluribus Unum
12
posted on
10/19/2025 7:10:49 PM PDT
by
Thud
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; cardinal4; ...
13
posted on
10/19/2025 7:23:46 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(NeverTrumpin' -- it's not just for DNC shills anymore -- oh, wait, yeah it is.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The president's one-man-show approach to policy has sidelined Congress, agencies — and a whole K Street culture. Congress has been give their powers to the president for over a century.
The agencies fall under the power of the president and always have.
K Street is an abomination.
I see no problems here.
I voted for this.
Yep.
Is it how things should be run if we were to go by all the original rules? No.
But they tore up that rule book long ago. This is the rule book they wanted and so now they are getting it.
14
posted on
10/19/2025 7:27:24 PM PDT
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(It's like somebody just put the Constitution up on a wall …. and shot the First Amendment -Mike Rowe)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Hey, if Congress chooses to delegate authority to the Executive Branch, then they've handed that power to the President and to nobody else. The days of "independent" commissions wielding executive power are grinding to a halt. Thankfully.
Now, if Congress ever decides to do its job by itself and not delegate authority to the Executive Branch or its agencies, they're fully entitled to keep that authority for themselves. But until then...they're the ones who gave it away.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
It shows vision. Any organization should follow its vision, formulated by the leader(s). You cannot have action or rules that are against the vision.
16
posted on
10/19/2025 10:16:06 PM PDT
by
paudio
(Charlie Kirk is this era's MLK)
To: quantim
I’ve been an advocate for starting there with massive Federal budget cuts since the 90s.
17
posted on
10/20/2025 12:25:40 AM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(Islam delenda est)
It’s called Article II of the Constitution, which intentionally comes before Article III which outlays the judicial branch.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I voted for it too.
@politico
If the Dems hadn’t abdicated their duties, Trump wouldn’t have such free rein - I voted for this.....
19
posted on
10/20/2025 5:41:22 AM PDT
by
trebb
(So many fools - so little time...)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson