| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
| Locked on 09/18/2025 6:39:10 AM PDT by Sidebar Moderator, reason: |
Posted on 09/18/2025 4:35:07 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
Emmanuel Macron and his wife, Brigitte, are planning to present photographic and scientific evidence to a US court to prove Mrs Macron is a woman.
Their lawyer says the French president and Mrs Macron will present the documentation in a defamation suit they have taken against the right-wing influencer Candace Owens after she promoted her belief that Brigitte Macron was born male.
Ms Owens' lawyers have responded with a motion to dismiss the claim.
Speaking to the BBC's Fame Under Fire podcast, the Macrons' lawyer in the case, Tom Clare, said Mrs Macron had found the claims "incredibly upsetting" and they were a "distraction" to the French president.
Mr Clare said there would be "expert testimony that will come out that will be scientific in nature" and while he would not reveal, at this stage, its exact nature, he said the couple were prepared to demonstrate fully "both generically and specifically" that the allegations are false.
"It is incredibly upsetting to think that you have to go and subject yourself, to put this type of proof forward," he said.
"It is a process that she will have to subject herself to in a very public way. But she's willing to do it. She is firmly resolved to do what it takes to set the record straight.
"If that unpleasantness and that discomfort that she has of opening herself up in that way is what it takes to set a record straight and stop this, she's 100% ready to meet that burden."
(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.com ...
A cheek swab would be enough.
If he’s a woman, that would do it.
Benji Brown on the SCOTUS is going to blow this for the Macrons. She hasn’t a clue what a woman is.
People argue over the dumbest things for clicks. But clicks = cash.
Didn’t a French author write about this? Why isn’t he being sued?
In the grand scheme of things I rate this as a boring distraction unworthy of attention. Having said that, the Macron’s seem to be bluffing. A cheek swab is all that’s necessary and hardly embarrassingly invasive. It’s a bluff designed to garner sympathy and spark a backlash.
Please God. Keep her clothes on. đ©
I have to agree with Candice here.
Typical venue shopping by the plaintiff.
A foreign national should not be able to select a venue to gain advantage over a US citizen and inflict financial burden.
Am I the only one here that thinks this entire question is funnier than hell.
An American personality has gotten so far under Macron’s skin they offer evidence in court.
It would be far easier to say that Macron NEVER out grew his adolescent fixation with the Oedipal stage. He in fact did marry a woman 24yrs older, who could have been his mommy. Either way it’s France,câest la vie.
“Didnât a French author write about this? Why isnât he being sued?”
Yep, while Candace did a lot of research, the French dude did the original work and Candace rightly gives him the credit that’s due.
Yup, bendover and swab between those cheeks
OhâŠnot what you meant?
This wholly case is embarrassing. Barbra Streisand syndrome.
Video on this topic—interesting for sure:
Don't go around suing people and you won't have this problem.
If you look at the video on post 14 the lawsuit starts to make sense.
This has been a red hot issue in France—and journalists there have been harassed for trying to investigate it.
The Macrons are acting as if they are guilty.
That proves nothing—but makes the case more interesting than it appears at first glance.
They are stooping towards the insanity. All this deviation is subterfuge and by a design from the “powers in the air.”
This could be absolute nonsense and much ado about nothing.
On the other hand it could expose the global elites as sick perverts.
The stakes may be higher than it appears.
“It is incredibly upsetting to think that you have to go and subject yourself, to put this type of proof forward,”
The Macronâs chose to do this. And what if the âphotographic evidenceâ is a stunt double? I donât know how you say âshow me the beaverâ in French? Visage le beaver? Le va-jay-jay se vou plait? There will be unanswered questions that only the court of public opinion can truly solve. Maybe send Geraldo Rivera in there to see whatâs what, or to see twats what? Or not.
The fact that this Napoleon without the funny hat is allowing this rumor to crawl under his skin is hysterical.
“A cheek swab would be enough.
If heâs a woman, that would do it.”
SMH so would a finger wave... Zeig Heil
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.