Posted on 08/18/2025 7:07:12 PM PDT by lasereye
- Markets had been nearly certain the Fed would cut rates in September, but fresh producer price data are weakening those odds ahead of Chair Jerome Powell’s Jackson Hole speech. While investors still see an 85% chance of a cut, Bank of America now expects rates to hold, warning tariffs and sticky inflation could keep policy tighter for longer. Analysts will be eyeing the back end of this week for the market-moving news.
Analysts have long priced in a number of cuts to the base rate in 2025. With just a handful of meetings left to go this year, September has been widely identified as the month when the interest rate will finally be reduced.
Markets were hoping for a further signal of their estimations this week, at the Jackson Hole Symposium held by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. Jackson Hole has previously been the site of tidal changes in monetary policy, with spectators widely expecting Chair Jerome Powell to keep up the tradition at the end of the week.
But as the summit draws closer, the data is only shifting further away from a rate-cut scenario, and the likelihood of a lower cut is more tenuous.
A week ago, the chance of a September cut was being priced in at more than 95% by the market. At the start of a week that might otherwise have solidified that belief, the odds are lower. According to CME’s FedWatch, the chance of the base rate being lower by one click to between 4% and 4.25% now stands at a little under 85%, with a 15.2% chance of a hold.
Markets are flat this morning as the events of late last week (namely, President Trump’s meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin) didn’t do enough to shift the dial on prospects for better or worse. Before the bell, the S&P 500 is down 0.3%, the Nasdaq is down 0.4%, and the Dow is up a minor 0.08%. S&P futures are down 0.08%.
In Europe the FTSE 100 is flat, Germany’s DAX is down 0.3%, and the French CAC is down 0.6%. In Asia the Nikkei 225 is up 0.77%, the SSE is up 0.85%, and the Hang Seng Index is down 0.37%.
Markets have good precedent to be looking toward the end of the week (the symposium is held from Thursday to Sunday) for major economic headlines. As Deutsche Bank noted to clients this morning: “The Fed chair’s speech at Jackson Hole has often been used to send important policy signals, and it was last year that Powell said the ‘time has come for policy to adjust’ before they then cut rates at the next meeting for the first time since the pandemic. This time around, we don’t have the full agenda yet, but the subtitle for Powell’s speech on the Fed’s website says, ‘Economic Outlook and Framework Review,’ so we can expect some insight on those topics.”
The notice of framework review is particularly of interest to Henry Allen, a macro strategist at Deutsche. The last time such a framework concluded was in 2020 and resulted in a shift toward average inflation targeting. Essentially, the Fed would look at periods where inflation had been persistently lower than 2% (across the span of the 2010s, for example) and would allow for policy that supported inflation above the 2% target to counteract the timing overall.
“The Fed also reinterpreted their approach to full employment, in that a tight labor market alone wasn’t a reason to raise rates. So that implied a move away from the preemptive approach whereby the Fed would tighten policy to get ahead of future inflation as the labor market tightened,” Allen wrote. “Of course, we now know that shortly after the framework review, there was then a major burst of inflation, and although it had many drivers, our U.S. economists concluded in a Friday note that the new framework was a contributor to that overshoot.
“So this time around, they expect Powell’s speech to call for rolling back the 2020 modifications and restoring a primary role for preemption.”
If the Fed does decide to take a longer-term view on inflation, those hoping for a cut may be disappointed. Since 2021, inflation has stayed persistently above the target of 2%, with analysts suggesting further pressures are coming down the pike courtesy of President Trump’s tariff plan.
Not even a week ago, the likes of Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent were not only confident of a September cut but also questioned whether a larger cut could be justified. The pressure for a cut came from a shock jobs report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which revealed the employment market has been in far worse shape this summer than previously expected.
The market’s surety of a cut grew as a result, expecting the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) to rush to the aid of the maximum employment side of its dual mandate. A better-than-expected consumer inflation report added to confidence—though most conveniently overlooked the fact core inflation has now inched over 3%.
However, July’s producer price index (PPI) poured a little cold water on the excitement, showing the fastest increase since March 2022 and hinting that while tariff pass-through hasn’t yet fully hit consumers, it’s bleeding into the domestic economy.
Indeed, the data has been enough to push Bank of America to side with the minority: that Powell will announce no change to the base rate next month.
Global economists Claudio Irigoyen and Antonio Gabriel wrote Friday: “With inflation essentially stuck over the past year, the tariff pass-through that we still expect, and the labor supply story keeping the unemployment rate historically low, we still think there is a strong case for the Fed to remain on hold. We will see next week if Powell holds the line or not, and then focus will shift to the next jobs report.”
My take is that while tariffs appear to be creating inflationary pressure, it's not the Fed's job to do anything about that. Their job is to ensure that excessive monetary growth is not pushing prices up. If inflation is caused by anything else, they have no tools to do anything about that - other than deliberately throwing the economy into a recession, which is idiotic.
Another point is that higher prices due to tariffs will not be ongoing. It will be a one-time event. It's not the Fed's job to prevent that.
Since Powell is incompetent, he thinks the Fed can somehow prevent tariffs from pushing some prices higher. It can't, other than causing a recession. Some of the people advising him may understand that. Powell's not an economist. He almost certainly is doing what somebody is telling him to do.
Since Powell is incompetent,
IMPROVED.
If you look carefully, you’ll see your quip wasn’t quite the flex you thought it was...
I think Bank savings accounts should be paying 3% plus the current Rate of Inflation.
But it's the thought that counts !
Aye...FReegards.
He’s a rat saboteur
How the heck can the Treasury fund the deficit spending with Treasury bonds not selling well at 5%?
If economy is getting weaker that will INCREASE the deficits and Treasury will need to sell more bonds!
Trump needs to fire him and to hell with the reaction from the markets, whatever the reaction is it will be short term!! Powell has completely mismanaged the renovation of the Fed building and if he can’t manage a renovation he certainly can’t manage the damn banking system!!
There are 12 FED governors. Vote Powell down.
U.S. Treasury rates are higher today than they were on January 1st — for every maturity ranging from 30 days to 30 years. The 30-year Treasury bill issued today is posting a rate of almost 5%. You can’t reduce rates in this environment. Investors are losing confidence in the U.S. dollar.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.