Posted on 07/25/2025 6:34:39 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
The administration’s claims are overblown, but newly declassified information provides some messy details about a January 2017 intelligence assessment of Moscow’s election interference.
The assessment said that President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia had ordered a multifaceted information operation targeting the U.S. presidential election, including by hacking and releasing Democratic emails and by seeding social media with messages promoting Mr. Trump and denigrating his rival, Hillary Clinton.
The assessment also attributed three motivations to Mr. Putin. Two have not been seriously challenged: He wanted to undermine public faith in democracy and to damage Mrs. Clinton, who until election night was...
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Nothing to see here Move along Back to EPSTEIN EPSTEIN EPSTEIN.
Needs Barf Alert
NY Times?.....not worth the paper it’s used to be printed on,even the puppy trainers have moved on.
Russian spent like 100k on Election interference, and that’s on the high side.
They spend more than that in 3 mins in Ukraine.
Obama brought in Billions. You couldn’t get a picture with Obama for the total amount Comey and Strzok claims Russia spent.
They had all Hillary’s info, her accounts were hacked.
They still havent given back the Pulitzer Prize award for outstanding journalism given to their lying drunk reporter Walter Duranty who claimed there was no communist-induced famine in Ukraine that caused 8 million murders from deliberate starvation.
These are not the droids you are looking for.
My understanding was that the Russians tried to hack both parties, but the Democrat’s security was lax, so they succeeded there when they couldn’t with the Republicans.
XLNT Point.
The New Jerk ButtSlimes weighs in for the Derp State...
Someone needs to post that chart of the progression from “This is a conspiracy theory!” to “Something did happen but it wasn’t this.” to “Well it did happen but it’s not as bad they make it out” to “Okay, yes, it’s true.”
Does the NY Times have a Pulitzer to defend?
The NYT reflexively covering for the Obama Coup Crew once again. Still they are denying that Obama, in any way, shape, form, or manner, ever, EVER could have organized a campaign to drive Trump from office in ignominy and disgrace, and follow with persecutions and harassments even after departure from the Oval Office. But the record is showing what is there, with even more substantiation to come as more and more background is uncovered and released.
NYT is the center of all propaganda from Obama Brennan Clapper Comey.
“They were involved in the scam.”
Yes, exactly. The NYTimes is getting shriller and shriller, trying to keep all eyes on Epstein, and away from Obama’s Russia-hoax (which the NYTimes abetted).
They must be worried.
The opposite of journalism.
“Yeah, Trump is the real liar here, not Brennan under oath in front of Congress, not Comey, swearing out bogus FISA warrants.
It’s just standard gaslighting bulls**t.
E. pluribus has a love affair going with the NY times. He posts almost all of their drivel here.
You left out “That’s old news.”
“It provides some messy details . . . “
Very messy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.