Skip to comments.
Supreme Court Lets Trump Fire Consumer Product Safety Regulators
The New York Times ^
| July 23, 2025Updated 5:55 p.m. ET
| Adam Liptak and Zach Montague
Posted on 07/23/2025 3:49:07 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
The court’s order was the latest in a series of emergency rulings on the scope of the president’s power over independent agencies.
The Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed President Trump to fire the three Democratic members of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, a five-member group that monitors the safety of items like toys, cribs and electronics.
The court’s brief order was unsigned, which is typical when the justices act on emergency applications, though the court’s three liberal justices dissented. The order cited as its reasoning a
previous decision involving the leaders of two other independent agencies, who the court ruled in May could be removed by Mr. Trump in a similar fashion, at least temporarily.
The order is not the last word in the case, which is pending in an appeals court and may return to the justices.
In a series of rulings since the start of Mr. Trump’s second term, the Supreme Court has almost without exception given him broad leeway to exercise control over the executive branch, including by firing officials despite a federal law limiting his authority to do so.
The Supreme Court has been chipping away at a 90-year-old precedent that allowed Congress to shield the leaders of independent agencies from politics by making it hard to fire them. In response to an emergency application in late May, the Supreme Court
let Mr. Trump remove, for now, the leaders of two other agencies:
Cathy A. Harris, a member of the Merit Systems Protection Board, and
Gwynne A. Wilcox, a member of the National Labor Relations Board.
The order on Wednesday echoed what the majority concluded then: that Mr. Trump could remove officials who exercised power on his behalf “because the Constitution vests the executive...”
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cpsc; democrats; productsafety; scotus
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Oh, Boy! Here we go!
Enemy Media reporting on babies in non-fire-retardant ‘Onesies’ going up in flames in...3...2...1!
*SMIRK*
2
posted on
07/23/2025 3:52:14 PM PDT
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have, 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The Supreme Court lets…[the President do something he was elected to do under his authority as President. An equal branch]
The NYT is crazy
3
posted on
07/23/2025 3:52:34 PM PDT
by
stanne
(Because they were mesmerized by Obama, the man for whom this was named, whose name they left out of )
To: E. Pluribus Unum
4
posted on
07/23/2025 3:54:38 PM PDT
by
JZelle
To: E. Pluribus Unum
In a series of rulings since the start of Mr. Trump’s second term,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
" MR. " Trump???????
How disrepectful! SAY PRESIDENT Trump you filthy Journalists!!!!!!!
5
posted on
07/23/2025 4:03:58 PM PDT
by
pollywog
(" O thou who changest not....ABIDE with me")
To: E. Pluribus Unum
May be an oversimplification on my part but I think all persons in the executive branch ultimately report to the Chief Executive Officer per the United States Constitution. And I don’t think the government can pass a ‘Federal law’ to change that. Independent agency, my arse.
6
posted on
07/23/2025 4:23:30 PM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
7
posted on
07/23/2025 4:32:04 PM PDT
by
PGalt
(Past Peak Civilization?)
To: stanne
You silly. It’s right there in the article: the U.S. government has four branches - The Legislative Branch, the Judicial Branch, the Exectuive Branch, and “Independent Agencies” Branch
8
posted on
07/23/2025 4:35:14 PM PDT
by
j.havenfarm
(24 years on Free Republic, 12/10/24! More than 10,500 replies and still not shutting up!)
To: stanne
Better title?
“Supreme Court Blocks Federal Judge, Clears Way for Trump to Fire 3 Democrats from Consumer Product Safety Commission”
9
posted on
07/23/2025 4:48:15 PM PDT
by
TheDon
(Remember the J6 political prisoners! Remember Ashli Babbitt!)
To: Jim Robinson
10
posted on
07/23/2025 4:49:29 PM PDT
by
Texas Fossil
(Texas is not about where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind and Attitude.)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
If the other side did this and that resulted such onesies fire would be written of as Kate term abortions.
11
posted on
07/23/2025 4:50:39 PM PDT
by
JohnBovenmyer
(History rhymes, not repeats: Trump defends the legacy of Ft Sutter)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
It took some searching, because the Slimes didn't say, but all three were Biden appointees.
12
posted on
07/23/2025 4:50:42 PM PDT
by
airborne
(Thank you Rush for helping me find FreeRepublic! )
To: Texas Fossil
13
posted on
07/23/2025 5:09:22 PM PDT
by
No name given
( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)
To: stanne
The Supreme Court lets...I thought the same when I saw it. The old grey whore just can't help itself and the garbage that works there show their bias in everything they write.
As an aside I really hope they enjoy their lives in "the city" under their logical candidate for mayor, Commie Mamdani.
Escape from New York might turn out to be prophetic.
14
posted on
07/23/2025 5:13:13 PM PDT
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy - EVs a solution for which there is no problem)
To: TheDon
Supreme Court Blocks Federal JudgeSupreme Court Blocks Rogue Federal Judge
15
posted on
07/23/2025 5:15:58 PM PDT
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy - EVs a solution for which there is no problem)
To: JohnBovenmyer
16
posted on
07/23/2025 6:32:01 PM PDT
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have, 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
More accurately:
"Supreme Court Lets Trump Replace Consumer Product Safety Regulators With Americans"
17
posted on
07/23/2025 7:57:44 PM PDT
by
SuperLuminal
(Where is rabble-rising Sam Adams now that we need him? Is his name Trump, now?)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
What were the current ones doing to get fired? It shouldn’t be political, would not surprise me if the people fired made it that way.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Lets?
19
posted on
07/24/2025 7:57:14 AM PDT
by
Elsie
( Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson