Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal judges want to build a force of armed private security under wild plan to take on Trump
Daily Mail ^ | May 25, 2025 | Rachal Bowman

Posted on 05/26/2025 10:01:04 AM PDT by Macho MAGA Man

Federal judges are considering hiring armed private security forces amid fears that US Marshals will not protect them because they work for Donald Trump.

The judiciary has been dealing with rising number of threats against magistrates who have ruled against the Trump administration's agenda.

.... Snip....

Some judges are concerned the security provided by the Marshals Service will not be enough to protect them, or that the White House will revoke their services as retaliation for their rulings.

The idea for private security came up in a series of closed-door meetings in March, when a group of roughly 50 judges met in Washington for a semiannual meeting of the Judicial Conference, a policymaking body for the federal judiciary, reported The Wall Street Journal.

Even Chief Justice John Roberts heard concerns from judges over a breakfast in a meeting room in the Supreme Court.

While the Supreme Court has its own police force, other federal judges are protected by the Marshals Service, which reports to Attorney General Pam Bondi.

On Thursday, Senate Democrats introduce legislation to transfer control of the Marshals Service to the judiciary, reported CBS News.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banglist; enemycombatants; federaljudges; judgearmy; judgewatch; judicialcoup; judicialinsurrection; judicialsedition; praetorianguard; rachalbowman; trump; usmarshals

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
The federal judiciary is implementing a coup against the executive office (Trump) and his MAGA agenda.
1 posted on 05/26/2025 10:01:04 AM PDT by Macho MAGA Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Daily Fail. Probably fake.

But I hope it’s true.


2 posted on 05/26/2025 10:03:00 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (Nobody elected Elon Musk? Well nobody elected the Deep State either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

0bama wanted his own private army too. Dictators need muscle.


3 posted on 05/26/2025 10:03:54 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

“Even Chief Justice John Roberts heard concerns from judges over a breakfast in a meeting room in the Supreme Court. “


Yet the prior four years it was well documented the left was targeting Clarence Thomas and Sam Alito- did Roberts do anything about it???


4 posted on 05/26/2025 10:04:41 AM PDT by God luvs America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

“The federal judiciary is implementing a coup against the executive office (Trump) and his MAGA agenda.”

It does seem that they’re getting ready to start a civil war. Problem is that they’ll lose.


5 posted on 05/26/2025 10:04:59 AM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man
Federal judges want to build a force of armed private security under wild plan to take on Trump

I suppose that would be OK, if the Federal "Judges" would change their titles to Federal Warlords.

6 posted on 05/26/2025 10:09:04 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (President Trump Decisively Won Popular & E.C., Celebrate Recivilization!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Crazy lefties show up at your house and make threats are no problem, but Bad Man Orange, that’s the problem! Give me a break!


7 posted on 05/26/2025 10:09:26 AM PDT by Lockbox (politicians, they all seemed like game show host to me.... Sting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

John Roberts is the Judicial Supremacist the Founders warned us about.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4316216/posts


8 posted on 05/26/2025 10:10:00 AM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Makes J-6 look like pokers eh?


9 posted on 05/26/2025 10:12:04 AM PDT by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this💩? 🚫💉! 🇮🇱👍!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Private meaning - where will they get the funds to pay for it?


10 posted on 05/26/2025 10:14:26 AM PDT by SkyDancer ( ~ Am Yisrael Chai ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Judiciary issuing nationwide injunctions and de facto usurping Article I and II powers unto itself.

Judiciary now seeking to have its own private Army.

But hey, Harvard is offering a free course on how to recognize a dictatorship. Good thing that we will all be able to take a Harvard course for free to indoctrinate, I mean educate us, on how Trump is a threat to democracy.

And if you don’t want to take it?

I am sure some Federal Judge will be happy to order you to do it and will soon have a private Army to back it up.

“Our Democracy” means “Their Democracy” and in their democracy, you white and obey or else!!


11 posted on 05/26/2025 10:15:19 AM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

why would you want security of judges transferred out of DOJ?


12 posted on 05/26/2025 10:15:44 AM PDT by RWGinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Old thinking: “These judges cannot enforce their partisan rulings. They have no army.”

New thinking: “The judges have an army.”


13 posted on 05/26/2025 10:17:12 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

My gut instinct just reading the headline was the judges were wanting to assemble an army to go storm the White House.

Having read the remainder of the article I’m still not totally convinced that’s not the case.


14 posted on 05/26/2025 10:17:35 AM PDT by cross_bearer_02
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlipWilson

Meant you shut up and obey or else.


15 posted on 05/26/2025 10:17:36 AM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man
With what money?
The House will not approve such a measure.
Meanwhile Trump should withdraw Federal marshals from rogue corrupt judges.
16 posted on 05/26/2025 10:18:30 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Title
The doctrine of judicial supremacy.
Names: Bonney, Charles Carroll, 1831-1903.
Created / Published
Philadelphia, Press of G.S. Harris & sons, 1883.
Headings- Courts—United States
Notes
- Also available in digital form. Library of Congress Control Number 18009178


17 posted on 05/26/2025 10:20:32 AM PDT by Bookshelf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

I think you mean pikers.


18 posted on 05/26/2025 10:22:27 AM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Always remember, the democrats believe that all power lies in whatever they control.

They don’t control the House. If they did, it would be the most important branch ever. It’s power sacrosanct.

They don’t control the Senate. Ditto above if they did.

Their bureaucratic allies are being wiped out.

Ah ha, liberal judges. All power must lie with them!! They rule!! Therefore they need an Army since liberal judges (not the entire judiciary, mind you) rule!!

Our democracy = their democracy = they are just in charge, no matter what and you obey.


19 posted on 05/26/2025 10:22:48 AM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Sounds insurrectiony.


20 posted on 05/26/2025 10:24:47 AM PDT by Sirius Lee ("Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson