Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Speaker Johnson: ‘States are not properly administering’ SNAP payments
The Hill ^ | 05/25/25 4:37 PM ET | by Elizabeth Crisp

Posted on 05/25/2025 11:12:34 PM PDT by RandFan

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) defended the House GOP’s proposed changes to the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) on Sunday, arguing that states will better administer food stamp benefits if they have to shoulder more of the costs.

“The states are not properly administering this because they don’t have enough skin in the game,” Johnson told CBS’s Margaret Brennan in an interview on “Face the Nation.”

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which the GOP-controlled House narrowly passed early Thursday morning after an overnight session, calls for the federal share of SNAP costs to drop from the current 100 percent level to 95 percent in 2028.

States could be forced to pick up more of the tab after that based on their payment error rates.

“We are not cutting SNAP,” Johnson said. “We’re working in the elements of fraud, waste and abuse.”

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), which oversees the nation’s largest nutrition assistance program, reported last year that nearly 11.7 percent of states’ payments were miscalculated. Alaska, New Jersey and South Carolina reported the most frequent overpayment error rates in 2023, USDA data shows.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alaska; ebt; newjersey; northcarolina; snap; usda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 05/25/2025 11:12:34 PM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RandFan

You put up big piles of unattended money and it attracts maggots. It’s not rocket science.


2 posted on 05/25/2025 11:20:29 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Democrats are the Party of anger, hate and violence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan
“....calls for the federal share of SNAP costs to drop from the current 100 percent level to 95 percent in 2028.

States could be forced to pick up more of the tab after that based on their payment error rates.

“We are not cutting SNAP,” Johnson said. “We're working in the elements of fraud, waste and abuse.”

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), which oversees the nation's largest nutrition assistance program, reported last year that nearly 11.7 percent of states’ payments were miscalculated. Alaska, New Jersey and South Carolina reported the most frequent overpayment error rates in 2023, USDA data shows....”

Wait a minute “last year 11.7 percent miscalculated payments” and certain states had “overpayment errors in 2023” 2023 and last year were part of the Biden Administration. So the fraud (or waste if you want to be enabling) were discovered by the Biden Administration and the Trump and House are trying to correct the situation.

Doesn't sound like the feds are “cutting SNAP” to starve people, it sounds like they are pushing the States to get their act together in administering federal funds. But that might be the problem is that states are incapable of administering federal funds without waste and fraud.

3 posted on 05/26/2025 12:15:04 AM PDT by Robert357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

100% to 95%?? That’s what the left is screaming about? Jeez.


4 posted on 05/26/2025 3:45:50 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

It should be called “The One Big Beautiful GOPe Porkfest Bill Act.” Granted the bill has much of President Trump’s agenda in it and that’s a good thing but it still piles on the national debt as it is loaded with pork projects and giveaways. In addition it raises the national debt ceiling by trillions, it is what the GOPe/RINOs do best. Doubtful the senate will chop it much and the congress will lose next year like it always does, folks just will not turn out to vote for these proven uniparty types.


5 posted on 05/26/2025 3:47:52 AM PDT by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

>>>100% to 95%?? That’s what the left is screaming about? Jeez.

The Left would scream regardless. We should have gone bigger, 50% at least.


6 posted on 05/26/2025 3:55:16 AM PDT by vikingd00d (chown -R us ~you/base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Yeah, that 5% contribution three years from now will change everything!


7 posted on 05/26/2025 3:58:03 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

And not just amounts, some blue States are approving them for folks who do no even qualify. They are handing them out like candy at a parade...


8 posted on 05/26/2025 4:01:32 AM PDT by Openurmind (AI - An Illusion for Aptitude Intrusion to Alter Intellect. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker; Openurmind

It’s a rounding error

I bet you can’t believe the suposedly esteemed Speaker goes on TV and champions this.

They’re utterly deluded and will never propose serious cuts

US will have to default first or have some sort of major crisis.

They have chosen this path through their inertia.


9 posted on 05/26/2025 4:06:09 AM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

It’s definitely not a good sign or direction. More every year of what they’ve been dishing out for decades now.


10 posted on 05/26/2025 4:07:01 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RandFan
“The states are not properly administering this because they don’t have enough skin in the game,” Johnson told CBS’s Margaret Brennan in an interview on “Face the Nation.”

Nope, it's because they're corrupt leftists who are using programs like that to buy votes to stay in power.

11 posted on 05/26/2025 4:11:57 AM PDT by metmom ( He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesus.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

There are 3rd and 4th generation of leeches on Snap. Reevaluate and cut those off that have received forever.


12 posted on 05/26/2025 4:28:04 AM PDT by albie (U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

They carefully watch snap for any abuse, they carefully avoid ending the taxes on Social Security. Hurricane wipe out your state or a city in Hawaii burns down…. Eff you, you measly American people. Write DOGE cuts into law? FU.

But if Ukraine wants something, money is no object. No accounting needed. Golden dome, how much do you need? Foreign aid to Taiwan, money for Gaza and Syria… how much you want?


13 posted on 05/26/2025 4:35:34 AM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2025... RETURN OF THE JEDI...Low IQ morons also have t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

What a genius. I knew that and I am just a peon.


14 posted on 05/26/2025 4:40:31 AM PDT by Hyman Roth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Congress has not properly structured SNAP. Reduce it to a limited supply of healthy basics and the cost per person covered could easily be a fraction of what it is.


15 posted on 05/26/2025 5:03:51 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

The “Act ... calls for the federal share of SNAP costs to drop from the current 100 percent level to 95 percent in 2028.”

The feral government should not be involved in welfare programs at all. That should be left up to each state government (several of which have balanced budget amendments in their constitutions).


16 posted on 05/26/2025 5:12:49 AM PDT by SharpRightTurn (“Giving money & power to government is like giving whiskey & car keys to teenage boys” P.J. O’Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

I agree. it should be a state program.


17 posted on 05/26/2025 5:30:15 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
"You put up big piles of unattended money and it attracts maggots."

That's a very accurate description.

18 posted on 05/26/2025 5:42:32 AM PDT by Dalberg-Acton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

GO TO www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4255795/posts

Post #34.
SEE the top of the receipt shown there.
SEE HOW MUCH $$$$$$$ INVADERS ARE GETTING FROM YOUR TAXES


19 posted on 05/26/2025 6:47:06 AM PDT by ridesthemiles (not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Over 1100 pages. The more things change, the more they stay the same.


20 posted on 05/26/2025 6:52:03 AM PDT by shooter223 (the government should fear the citizens......not the other way around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson