Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ex-FBI agent and Pentagon contractor sues over secret recording showing him criticizing Trump
AP News ^ | Updated 6:06 PM CDT, May 14, 2025 | Eric Tucker

Posted on 05/14/2025 7:49:12 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

WASHINGTON (AP) — A former FBI agent and Pentagon contractor has sued the founder of a conservative nonprofit known for its hidden camera stings over secretly recorded videos showing the contractor criticizing President Donald Trump to a woman he thought he had taken on a date.

Jamie Mannina says in his lawsuit that he was misled by a woman he met on a dating website who held herself out as a politically liberal nurse but who was actually working with the conservative activist James O’Keefe in a sting operation designed to induce Mannina into making “inflammatory and damaging” remarks that could be recorded, “manipulated” and posted online.

Clips from their January conversations were spliced together to make it appear that Mannina was “essentially attempting to launch an unlawful coup against President Trump,” and articles released online with the videos defamed Mannina by painting him as part of a “deep state” effort with senior military officials to undermine Trump’s presidency, according to the lawsuit filed Wednesday in federal court in Washington.

Mannina does not deny in the lawsuit making the comments but says his words were taken out of context, edited and pieced together in a manner designed to paint him in a false light, including in a written description on YouTube that accompanied the publication of one of the recordings.

O’Keefe founded Project Veritas in 2010 but was removed from the organization in 2023 amid allegations that he mistreated workers and misspent funds. He has continued to employ similar hidden camera stings as part of a new organization he established, O’Keefe Media Group, which also is named in the lawsuit along with the woman who pretended to be on dates with Mannina. Her identity is not known, the lawsuit says.

O’Keefe told The Associated...

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2010; destroyjamiemannina; enemycombatant; fbi; fbisedition; hangthistraitor; insurrection; insurrectionist; jamiemannina; mannina; okeefe; okeefemediagroup; omg; projectveritas; sedition; seditionist; traitorexposed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
I wonder who is paying for his attorney?
1 posted on 05/14/2025 7:49:12 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Yes, that would be good to know.

I hope O’Keefe has the unedited video so he can prove that the clips he aired were not edited or “taken out of context”. I don’t know what additional words this guy thinks he said that would negate what he clearly said in the video that was posted.

And I hope that O’Keefe is able to get compensation for his costs to defend himself when this is found to be a frivolous lawsuit. AND I hope the court lets him receive punitive damages for it as well.


2 posted on 05/14/2025 7:53:25 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Members of the Uniparty are the scummiest grifters on the face of the Earth.


3 posted on 05/14/2025 7:54:29 PM PDT by kiryandil (No one in AZ that voted for Trump voted for Gallego )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Mannina does not deny in the lawsuit making the comments but says his words were taken out of context, edited and pieced together in a manner designed to paint him in a false light...

Isn't that what SeeBS/60 Minutes did with their Kamala interview?

4 posted on 05/14/2025 7:56:37 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Democrats are the Party of anger, hate and violence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
I wonder who is paying for his attorney?

Deep State. He was a VERY high level contractor who alleged knowledge of a coup against Trump among "generals."

5 posted on 05/14/2025 7:58:02 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I mean, is he gonna claim that right after he said what he’s on video saying, he said, “Just kidding.”?

Or maybe he’s gonna claim he had his fingers crossed behind his back...

He needs to say exactly what else he said that negates or “puts into correct context” what he is on tape saying. If he’s gonna make the claim that O’Keefe left out something important, then he needs to say exactly what it was that O’Keefe left out. If not, this lawsuit is simply libel against O’Keefe, and I hope O’Keefe countersues - and that the court uses this opportunity to make an example out of anybody who would lie to the court in order to make the court complicit in libel.


6 posted on 05/14/2025 7:58:17 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

I hope Kash and Bondi are getting subpoenas and warrants so they can follow the money on this. If it is Deep State, their tracks should be possible to follow, if investigators are proactively looking.


7 posted on 05/14/2025 8:00:59 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

“I hope Kash and Bondi are getting subpoenas and warrants so they can follow the money on this.“

Don’t hold your breath on that one


8 posted on 05/14/2025 8:08:59 PM PDT by iamgalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

This is entrapment.


9 posted on 05/14/2025 8:09:20 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (Nobody elected Elon Musk? Well nobody elected the Deep State either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Defamation is about false statements of fact that damage a person’s reputation, while false light focuses on portraying someone in a misleading way, even if the portrayal isn’t technically false. False light can also protect a person’s emotional well-being.
Unless O’Keefe did a 60 Minutes hatchet job (’SEE: ‘Ambush At Fort Bragg’ by Tom Wolfe),i.e. selective editing, this Strzok fellow traveler(?) may be looking at a QBVII (Leon Uris)-type judgment: &1.00. Legally in DC, O’Keefe did nothing wrong in recording him.


10 posted on 05/14/2025 8:09:53 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

The sooner arrests are made the better.


11 posted on 05/14/2025 8:10:02 PM PDT by No name given ( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I’m betting the world enslavement forum.


12 posted on 05/14/2025 8:10:28 PM PDT by No name given ( Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

If he wants to talk badly about Trump to others, he should just own up to it and tread more lightly next time he tries to impress a girl.


13 posted on 05/14/2025 8:15:06 PM PDT by KittyKares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
This is entrapment.

Nobody forced him to say anything. He was flapping his gums to get laid.


14 posted on 05/14/2025 8:20:47 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Democrats are the Party of anger, hate and violence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

He apparently revealed and celebrated a criminal conspiracy against the elected President of the U.S. That does not sound very smart for a guy out on a date.

Betrayal is its own punishment. Once you are seen as a traitor, nobody on any side will ever trust you.


15 posted on 05/14/2025 8:22:19 PM PDT by Gnome1949
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Yes, because if O’Keefe were caught editing video deceptively, it would be the end of his career as a journalist, and I don’t think he would ever risk that.


16 posted on 05/14/2025 8:26:07 PM PDT by bigbob (Yes. We ARE going back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
This is entrapment.

They were not law enforcement agents and AFAIK he is not being prosecuted for a crime.
17 posted on 05/14/2025 8:29:03 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 ( The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

He should be prosecuted for sedition and treason.


18 posted on 05/14/2025 8:41:02 PM PDT by FlyingEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I wonder who is paying for his attorney?

Xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Reid Hoffman picks up a lotta tabs for stuff that’s damaging to trump


19 posted on 05/14/2025 8:41:19 PM PDT by thinden (Buckle Up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
I wonder who is paying for his attorney?

You are exactly correct. This suit is without merit and the person suing and his lawyers know this. The person or organization will incur great expense in defending the suit. This is law fare. Use the court system to bankrupt your opponent by suits you know you will lose.

20 posted on 05/14/2025 8:42:20 PM PDT by cpdiii (cane cutter, deckhand, oilfield roughneck, drilling fluid tech, geologist, pilot, pharmacist ,MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson