Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North Carolina Supreme Court Race in Turmoil: Democrat’s 700-Vote Victory Now in Jeopardy as 65,000 Voters Ordered to Prove Eligibility or Be Removed from Count
Gateway Pundit, ^ | Apr. 4, 2025 | Jim Hᴏft

Posted on 04/04/2025 12:06:29 PM PDT by george76

What was hailed by Democrats as a narrow 734-vote victory for Allison Riggs in the 2024 North Carolina Supreme Court race is now spiraling into electoral chaos, as a court ruling has cast doubt over tens of thousands of ballots that could flip the outcome in favor of conservative challenger Judge Jefferson Griffin.

In a stunning decision filed Thursday, the North Carolina Court of Appeals ruled that approximately 65,000 ballots—cast by voters with incomplete registration information, missing photo identification, or submitted by individuals who have never lived in North Carolina—may be invalid under state and federal election law.

The 2-1 decision was authored by Judges John Tyson and Fred Gore, both registered Republicans. Judge Tobias Hampson, a Democrat, dissented from the majority opinion.

The court ordered election officials across the state’s 100 counties to notify affected voters, giving them 15 business days to prove they are legally eligible to vote, or their ballots could be tossed out, handing conservatives a chance to reclaim a critical seat on the state’s highest court.

Democrat Allison Riggs was declared the winner in November by just 734 votes—garnering 2,770,412 votes (50.01%) to Griffin’s 2,769,678 (49.99%).

The race went to a recount since the vote difference was fewer than 10,000 votes. Republican Griffin was leading the race until Democrat Riggs overcame her opponent weeks after the election.

But Griffin immediately filed protests, arguing that unlawful ballots had tainted the outcome.

Judge Griffin argued that thousands of votes were cast by individuals who never completed their registration by providing a valid driver’s license or the last four digits of their Social Security number, as required under state law since 2004.

Others allegedly failed to include a copy of their photo ID—another legal requirement—and some were cast by “Never Residents,” overseas voters who have never lived in North Carolina but claimed eligibility through a parent.

In its 37-page opinion, the court blasted the North Carolina State Board of Elections for failing to uphold election laws. In fact, the Board itself had used QR codes and mass mailings to communicate with voters—then rejected Griffin’s use of similar methods to notify challenged voters.

The court ruled that the Board’s internal procedures could not override state law, which clearly requires all voters to provide proper registration information and comply with photo ID laws. It also stated that the Board had no authority to “exempt” military and overseas voters from these legal requirements.

In a direct rebuke to the Board’s handling, the court wrote, “To condemn a non-statutory and voluntary method of notice and means to seek additional information, which the Board has repeatedly used, is essentially throwing stones while sitting inside a glass house.”

The State Board of Elections must now notify the 65,000 affected voters, giving them 15 business days to verify their eligibility. If they fail to do so, their ballots will be removed from the final count.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: North Carolina; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: electionfraud; electionintegrity; electoralchaos; fraud; gayblog; hoftisafairy; northcarolina; riggedelection; stolenelection; supremecourt; votefraud; voterfraud; voterid; votingfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

1 posted on 04/04/2025 12:06:29 PM PDT by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: george76

Wait! What?

We aren’t allowed to cheat?

When did that happen?


2 posted on 04/04/2025 12:08:15 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Democrats are the Party of anger, hate and violence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Your sarcasm is right on. Agree totally.


3 posted on 04/04/2025 12:10:30 PM PDT by john drake (Lucius Accius-Roman,170 BC - "oderint dum metuant" translated "Let them hate so long as they fear")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: george76

How do they know whose ballots belong to whom?


4 posted on 04/04/2025 12:10:44 PM PDT by pgyanke (Republicans get in trouble when not living up to their principles. Democrats... when they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

“But Griffin immediately filed protests, arguing that unlawful ballots had tainted the outcome.”

Finally a Republican contests something.


5 posted on 04/04/2025 12:12:19 PM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Would be nice to see this approach in Wisconsin as well...


6 posted on 04/04/2025 12:12:20 PM PDT by woweeitsme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

DOnt’ worry - it will be consdiered a Civil Rights action to be judged upon by a Federal Court and throwing out the review by the state. I wonder if they are subject to Civil Rights review of voting as most Southern States have been and still suffer


7 posted on 04/04/2025 12:12:45 PM PDT by linedrive ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Winning!!!


8 posted on 04/04/2025 12:12:52 PM PDT by Wpin ("I Have Sworn Upon the Altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

” overseas voters who have never lived in North Carolina but claimed eligibility through a parent.”

What?


9 posted on 04/04/2025 12:13:09 PM PDT by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

The present hairball election systems of mail-in voting, ballot harvesting, signature matching, instant registration, no ID voting - whether found in NC or elsewhere - is an inherently fragile and corrupt system which will necessarily produce conflict and chaos.

The sooner they crash and burn, the better.


10 posted on 04/04/2025 12:13:31 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linedrive

No, no and no!
Next?


11 posted on 04/04/2025 12:14:38 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dljordan
Finally a Republican contests something.

Doesn't matter. The courts ruled Trump had "no standing" to contest election results. The same playbook is still in effect.

12 posted on 04/04/2025 12:16:06 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Democrats are the Party of anger, hate and violence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: george76
Allison Riggs

Her surname is the hint.

13 posted on 04/04/2025 12:18:27 PM PDT by Major Matt Mason (Everyone that voted Trump/R in '24 needs to show up in '26.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dljordan

” overseas voters who have never lived in North Carolina but claimed eligibility through a parent.”

Yeah, uh...shouldn’t they be arrested for voter fraud?


14 posted on 04/04/2025 12:18:29 PM PDT by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: george76
the Board itself had used QR codes and mass mailings to communicate with voters—then rejected Griffin’s use of similar methods to notify challenged voters

This used to be called an "Overt Act" in furtherance of a Criminal Conspiracy to commit Election Fraud.
15 posted on 04/04/2025 12:19:25 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

This court has ruled differently.


16 posted on 04/04/2025 12:19:27 PM PDT by philippa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: george76

Take that commieRATs!


17 posted on 04/04/2025 12:20:04 PM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery, wildlife and climbing, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
When did that happen?

Don't you have to tell them before they rig the election?

18 posted on 04/04/2025 12:21:50 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: george76
Waiting for a Hawaiian judge to step in and stop this base on some sort of tortured reading (or non-reading likely) of the Constitution.

I know its a state issue but that has never stopped them previously.

19 posted on 04/04/2025 12:22:20 PM PDT by frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Now we know what happened in the 2020 Presidential Election.


20 posted on 04/04/2025 12:24:43 PM PDT by Ponyexpress9790 (Every one that votes democrat is your enemy, there is no co-existing with traitors and terrorists. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson