Posted on 01/30/2025 11:13:35 AM PST by bitt
Housing and land use experts say a Los Angeles city law could require the Pacific Palisades to include “affordable” housing to replace older buildings.
Housing and land use experts say a Los Angeles city law could require the Pacific Palisades to include “affordable” housing to replace older buildings, and for new buildings where owners cannot definitively prove that their rental apartments had no low-income renters in the past five years.
The new Resident Protections Ordinance taking effect soon requires that “In Higher Opportunity Areas and Moderate Opportunity Areas, units deemed or presumed to be occupied by persons or families above the lower income category shall be replaced with low income units.” The RPO applies to units “subject to a form of rent or price control through a local government’s valid exercise of its police power.”
In the city of Los Angeles, which includes the Pacific Palisades — a “High Opportunity Area" — all apartment buildings built before October 1978 are subject to the city’s rent control ordinance, which means all units in such buildings would need to be replaced with units “affordable” to lower-income renters even if the existing tenants were high income.
For buildings after October 1978, owners must be able to prove that in the last five years before the fire that the tenants were all higher income, or the city will automatically apply “the percentage of Extremely Low Income, Very Low Income and Low Income Households in the same proportion as their share of all renter households within the City of Los Angeles,” which would result in requiring proportional replacement with extremely low, very low, and low income housing if owners do not have complete records for the past five years.
(Excerpt) Read more at justthenews.com ...
Section Eight housing, which brings DEI from lower income areas into elite communities. Social engineering.
Burn it down and then drive it down with stack and pack ghetto housing.
Good. 80% of the Palisades vote Democrat, let them live under the principles they voted for, which typically is applied in low and middle income areas. Now they will get a taste of excessive bureaucracy. I feel sorry for the 20% who did not go along with the Group Think.
“Secure your elections before it’s too late.”
It’s too late for California. The socialists have taken control and they will never have another fair election that isn’t overseen by the Trump DOJ.
But of course...
When will the populace learn?
Vote these people out!
So, Pacific Palisades will become a mixed dwelling anthill. How nice for all the clever prosperous liberals who lived there and voted blue every time. California— living the dream.
Mayjor dumBass
No, it doesn't.
Well, what'll it be MUST or COULD?
And just how many of THESE were there?
Don’t know. It’s the orig8nal qualifying number that is used. Knowing the “Affordable Housing” lobbying group, thre don’t care if the income level changes.
The ones who get voted into office by ‘low income’ folks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.