Posted on 12/24/2024 8:50:15 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27
The debate around the value of flexible work for government workers has intensified, not only at the federal level but also in state government, with certain legislators adamant about mandating a return to traditional office settings.
In Wisconsin, this has come to a head, with Gov. Tony Evers (D) threatening to veto any state budget that contains return-to-office mandates for state employees.
Using Wisconsin as a lens, it is evident that pushing government employees back into the office en masse is not only counterproductive but also short-sighted, ignoring the realities of modern work dynamics and evidence supporting flexible arrangements.
Wisconsin’s experience demonstrates that remote work enhances both productivity and equity.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
Get your lazy a**es back to work, in the office, unless you have some provable medical condition that prevents you from doing so.
NUKE THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL PORTION OF THE FEDERAL GOV'T!!!!
“Wisconsin’s experience demonstrates that remote work enhances both productivity and equity.” As a business owner what is equity?
Headline is Bab Bee worthy.
Wisconsin’s experience demonstrates that remote work enhances both productivity and equity.
Most work should be remote, and government buildings turned into housing. the problem is that much of remote work is fraudulent and not tracked properly.
Even the dairy farmers have to get dressed and walk to the barn to work. This article just delivered another 50,000 republican votes, and yet made Madison giddy with what they falsely see as support for the government couch worker class.
Government workers should all wear body cams so that their supervisor can watch them “work from home”.
I have to agree, we get plenty of exposure to the leftist media. We don’t need that crap soiling FR.
Or it could skyrocket efficiency!
These publications just want to hate Trump no matter what. See Tagline.
Or it could skyrocket efficiency!
“Wisconsin experience” proves nothing at all. If “work from home” has not impacted the overall productivity as compared to having all the employees on-site and bent over their desks, then the agency has employed far too many employees for the workload.
Be sure the employees are goofing off just as much while they are physically present as they are while they are “working remotely”.
In general, I think you nailed it, I think it’s much more cost effective to have people work from home if their role is suitable, but I think we should use the unused office space to detain illegals awaiting court dates.
Musk should do this with all of the unused office space the Federal unions just opened up.
As for tracking remote work, IMHO you shouldn't hire people if you can't trust them to work unsupervised, remote or not.
I primarily work remotely, and I will let my boss know if things come up at home (repairs, internet outage, etc) which interfere with my workload, but I am salaried.
What a bunch of liberal hogwash.
Bureaucracy is the most efficient way to demonstrate maximum inefficacy.
Article:
“equity” = anti-white hate.
I guess you can do that remotely or in the office.
Lol.
Fatter pensions and sweeter benefits....oh, and you can’t get fired.
Sexual harassment and violations of social policy are not happening when workers aren’t in the same building.
Government Bureaucracies are totally dedicated to the Maynard G. Krebs work ethic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.