Posted on 10/09/2024 12:51:02 PM PDT by libstripper
Last week a judge unsealed a 165-page legal brief with damaging new revelations about Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
The revelations have been widely discussed and debated — but the timing of the release should receive more scrutiny, because the Department of Justice should not have allowed the information to be disclosed so close to Election Day. This event is the latest of many examples of Biden administration officials paying insufficient public attention to executive branch rules that are designed to ensure that prosecutions are, in appearance and reality, conducted fairly and apolitically.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
" Jack Goldsmith (@jacklgoldsmith) is a law professor at Harvard, a nonresident senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and a former assistant attorney general. He is a co-author of “After Trump: Reconstructing the Presidency.”
If anyone has trouble with the NYT paywall, here's an article that summarizes the column and links it:
https://www.breitbart.com/2024-election/2024/10/09/ny-times-op-ed-jack-smith-abused-power-interfering-in-election/
A legal beagle said the usual for this type of submittal is 40 pages...not 165.
Yeah boot jack smith’s got some splaing to do now that it’s being reported his wife & MIL are on soroz open society payrolls
My dear Professor Goldsmith,
Jack Smith’s mission is not to be fair or objective. His mission is to get Trump, one way or another. Policy can change on a dime. Elections be damned. In fact, the more damage, the better. This has nothing to do with justice, fairness or even moral obligations. It is purely and simply ‘politics’........
Sincerely,
Red Badger
Goldsmith?
Why...he’s a Japhethite dgoo.
#ashkenazi
#khazarian
With Smith’s original grand theater prosection thrown out of Federal Court - and now that he has come back with a ridiculous re-hash of political charges that is floundering - is the deep-state throwing Jack Smith under the bus to preserve its own reputation?
“If the facts are against you, argue the law. If the law is against you, argue the facts. If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell”
― Carl Sandburg
Too wimpy to pound the table and yell... drop a pile of BS on the bench.
Could have fooled me since I don't even see Leftists trumpeting this "report". This was a nothingburger.
Simply paste the URL at the link:
Sometimes there is an “I’m human test”, that will exclude some.
Simple and easy, works well.
The New York Times knows more than one way to lie
Behind The Curtain: How The New York Times Manufactures Lies For Democrats To Attack Their Opponents
He owes us a refund for prosecuting cases he has no court standing with, having been illegally appointed special prosecutor.
Time to put Smith’s *** on a slow boat to China. We don’t need America haters here.
This was in the NY Times?
A good explanation from Jack Smith would be a lengthy jail sentence for him.
“If the law and the facts are against you, pound the table and yell like hell”
Or continue to beat a dead horse.
According to Forbes Magazine as of March of this year he’s cost us $35 million.
Imagine how many student loans...
Jerk Smith is the same corrupt prosecutor who went after Bob McDonnell on a legal theory he knew or should have known was bogus.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.