Posted on 09/28/2024 1:10:06 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Vice President Kamala Harris’s approval rating curiously increased after she entered the presidential race in July, an NBC News poll found this week, causing political pundits to question why.
Before Harris joined the race, she held the lowest net negative rating (-17) for a vice president in U.S. history. Her approval rating was only 28 percent in January 2024, and it only improved to 32 percent in July, the month President Joe Biden stepped aside. Harris’s approval rating is now 48 percent, an increase of 16 points in just two months.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Just goes to show that people are sheep..they pretend like they dont believe what the media says but in reality they do, every single word..so yes the commie media is powerful
The effort to indoctrinate worked. The media is more powerful than ever, in spite of the access to alternative information sources.
Stop it with this polling! Other polls keep showing Trump is more likeable, in the lead, etc.
Agree. However....Don't get sick, get even.
We have less than 6 weeks to bring out the truth about her. We need whistleblowers and TV ads showing her nasty side that made 94% staff turnover a reality. Hopefully some audio of her disdaining the little morons who she leads.
NBC News poll
**************
Consider the source. Likely oversampled and worded to elicit pro-Harris response.
She’s about as likeable as herpes.
Calling BS on this “poll”.
The stunts and sockcuckers of the media have put the pedal to the metal in promoting Kamala. I have lost any confidence that I once had in the MSM.
After people said to me “no one watches TV news any more so your arguments about them influencing anyone are useless.”-—paraphrase.
Just heard someone from Media Research Center say the regular TV news shows are the number one source of news to form opinions by voters. Number one, despite declines.
Horrifying to think Nicole Williams and Michael Steele on MSNBC sway people.
They have to artificially pump up her numbers so the steal looks believable.
I’m everywhere on social media and in real life telling lefties that they are supporting a manufactured candidate that they neither wanted nor voted for. Also, I make sure to tell them the democrat party appreciates them doing as they’re told, getting in line, and voting as they’re told.
Note well: Congress allocated $90 million tax dollars (that we know of) to the US Postal Service to compensate them for services rendered to voters living abeoad.
Citizens living overseas, including members of the armed forces, are allowed by law to vote absentee in elections. In Montana, a functioning absentee system allows them to vote starting 45 days until Election Day.
But this past August, we learned that Democrats have gone global, committing $300,000 to register and influence 9 million overseas voters — even though the federal government says only 2.4 million legal voters live in other countries. That’s 6.4 million votes that Democrats want to find...that don’t exist. The group financing the efforts——Democrats Abroad—— told CBS News that the ballots are “likely to favor Kamala Harris.”
Contact the RNC
310 1st St SE
Washington, DC 20003
(202) 863-8500
I bet this is especially true with the political apathetic. They don't really care, so they'll tune in to find out the "latest".
NBC - NOTHING BUT CRAP NETWORK
I’ll repeat this from an earlier thread. I was in the media for 40 years, and it happened EVERY election, in nearly EVERY race, from dogcatcher to President:
At this point in every campaign for decades, the media’s pollsters make it look close so BOTH SIDES continue buying up advertising. Political season is Christmas for media outlets, particularly since candidates must pay for their advertising UP FRONT.
So look for pollsters to portray this race and other races to be tight, neck-and-neck, until the day before Election Day, when the real numbers will be reported to shore up what is left of the pollsters’ credibility.
The polls right now are all about advertising dollars for the media, not political reality.
Tainted polling...
Both the media and totally controlling and dominating the air war/living room campaign do indeed have an effect.
In plain English, "Follow the money."
(literally translated: to whose good?)
Nothing artificial about it - the media coverage has been overwhelmingly positive.
And she has also dominated and controlled the advertising on most media outlets with biographical sketches. She defined herself.
There’s nothing artificial - positive media coverage and aggressive advertising and marketing do indeed shape public perception.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.