Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Finds RFK Jr. Can Bring Censorship Lawsuit Against Biden Admin After Supreme Court Rejects States’ Challenge
Daily Caller ^ | 8/22/24 | KATELYNN RICHARDSON

Posted on 08/22/2024 1:50:43 PM PDT by CFW

A federal judge ruled Tuesday that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. can continue to pursue his censorship lawsuit against the Biden administration.

The Supreme Court ruled in June that state and individual plaintiffs who alleged the Biden administration violated their First Amendment rights when it pressured social media companies to suppress speech did not have standing to sue. District Court Judge Terry Doughty found Kennedy meets the standard set by the Supreme Court because there is “ample evidence” to show he has been censored in the past at the direction of government actors and “substantial risk” that the censorship will continue.

Under the Supreme Court’s Murthy v. Missouri ruling, Doughty explained that “a court must make specific findings that a particular defendant pressured a particular platform to censor a particular topic before the platform suppressed a particular plaintiff’s speech on that topic.”

“The Court finds that there is further risk for future risk injury here because Kennedy is a 2024 presidential candidate,” Doughty wrote. “For example, if, hypothetically, the FBI saw a piece of information related to the 2024 presidential election posted by the Kennedy campaign on social media that it deemed to be ‘misinformation,’ then it reached out to CISA, who worked closely with the EIP, who then removed the posts, Kennedy would be censored by the action of one Government Defendant in response to another.”

[snip]

“It is gratifying that Judge Doughty found RFK, Jr. and Children’s Health Defense have standing, even under the draconian requirements the Supreme Court developed in Murthy,” New Civil Liberties Alliance litigation counsel Jenin Younes told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “We are assessing next steps for the Murthy plaintiffs in light of Judge Doughty’s opinion, which will also assist us in crafting discovery requests to ensure we can demonstrate standing going forward.”

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 98to0; bidenadministration; censorship; corruption; jfkjr; nicoleshanahan; rfkjr; robertkennedyjr; terryadoughty; terrydoughty; trumpjudge; wdlouisiana
Good news for the First Amendment!
1 posted on 08/22/2024 1:50:43 PM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Fuzz
Judge Finds RFK Jr. Can Bring Censorship Lawsuit Against Biden Admin After Supreme Court Rejects States’ Challenge

This is another example of how stupid and broken is our idiot court system. *THIS JUDGE* gets it right, but he has only had to act because the *OTHER JUDGES* got it so wrong.

They dismissed for "lack of standing" everyone else's attempts to hold the Biden Administration accountable for pressuring the corrupt big tech companies to censoring his political opponents.

This should have not been dismissed for lack of standing. *EVERYONE* is injured by big tech censorship, so *ANYONE* should be seen as having standing.

Thankfully this one Judge has now opened up a pathway by which this absolutely necessary case may be moved forward.

2 posted on 08/22/2024 2:08:56 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFW

DEMOCRAPS are vampires.


3 posted on 08/22/2024 2:38:55 PM PDT by Mark (DONATE ONCE every 3 months-is that a big deal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

According to many courts (including SCOTUS) American citizens have little “standing” when it comes to their Constitutional rights.


4 posted on 08/22/2024 2:41:35 PM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CFW; DiogenesLamp

It’s incredible the no standing argument

And yes ive seen SCOTUS wheel out that excuse before too.

It’s intolerable and should end


5 posted on 08/23/2024 3:28:32 AM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RandFan; CFW
It’s incredible the no standing argument

And yes ive seen SCOTUS wheel out that excuse before too.

It’s intolerable and should end

Agree.

6 posted on 08/23/2024 11:13:45 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson