Posted on 08/08/2024 11:46:58 PM PDT by mbrfl
Donald Trump did something Kamala Harris has failed to do since she ripped the 2024 Democratic nomination away from Joe Biden: answered questions from the press. The event, held at Mar-a-Lago, featured Trump ripping into Harris’ intelligence, announcing three dates for debates with the vice president, and warning how the nation is on the verge of economic disaster if Kamala wins in November.
The media tried to fact-check the president, and it devolved into such a ticky-tack game of linguistic nonsense that it only served as yet another reminder of why these clowns are mocked and distrusted. First, CNN tried to say that Trump was wrong to say that Kamala Harris failed to pass the bar. Harris did eventually pass—the operative word being eventually. It took Ms. Harris multiple times to pass the bar exam.
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
Your post history indicates you are a polite leftist.
Why are you wasting your life snapping at the ankles of broad shouldered conservitives.
You’re wrong about everything and this lying thing is unbecoming.
In the olden times you would have already been zotted, ozone would have filled the air, but alas we’re in a kinder gentler time.
I think you’d be happier at DU. They lie, you lie, there’s a synergy there.
Trump should add the kicker to his debate offer. He can say with 3 debates if the current candidate does poorly it will leave enough time for the democrats to pick another candidate.
In all fairness, almost all of these politicians graduated from a “national” law school like Harvard, Yale, Columbia, NYU, Cal-Berkley (Hastings), etc. Graduates of national law schools tend to have lower first time bar passage rates than regional law schools because unlike regional law schools, the national law schools do not teach the law of any particular state.
I graduated from a well-respected regional law school (at least it was until it went DEI/Woke), and passed the bar on my first attempt. Although none of the first year courses were state specific, many higher level courses focused on local law.
My law school had a first time pass rate (back then) of about 92% compared to the state average of approximately 70%. That’s why I went there. I needed a law job and couldn’t afford to waste another three months studying for the bar exam, again.
Media soft ball questions will be the norm for Harris & Walz.
Actually... I think he was a RINO.
Was it an oral exam?
That is actually a good point. Kamala and that whackjob Walz aren’t playing the game seriously.
This is how we know that the cheat and fraud is in. Their campaign is a MSM campaign to gaslight voters into believing this race is close.
It is the same technique that was used to snooker Americans into believing Ukraine has been winning for a couple years now. It is all media driven talk and no major media on the ground reporting.
For Trump, this type of deception is difficult to deal with.
The truth is until the RAT convention is over, he has no idea exactly who he is running against.
t took Ms. Harris multiple times to pass the bar exam.
2...
4?
6??
9???
69???
She fell pretty far from this tree for sure!
Thank you!
The media is willingly hiding Kamala because once she starts talking unscripted, it’s game, set and match. Yes, the bar is that low and she can’t jump it..
MSM: go after Trump but ignore Kamala’s ignorance.
Like many California Republicans.
BTTT!
How about, “I know you are, but what am I?”
Ted Kennedy - he never passed a bar...without stopping in for a few pops.
Pete Wilson was a "Republican," but a total RINO.
The operative word being eventually
It’s why she used the same speech 5 times.
Her mind doesn’t remember things very well and her mind doesn’t remember things very well she said.
YOU WIN POST OF THE DAY
Once CA approves reading for the law the bar exam is dead.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.