Posted on 07/31/2024 6:22:49 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg said Wednesday on MSNBC’s “Deadline” that he believed the Republican Party “long ago sacrificed their claim to be the party of family.”
Buttigieg said, “It kind of classic projection, right? The very things he’s talking about, virtue, strength, security, family, those are all things that Trump’s Republican Party has completely abandoned, making any claim to. Virtue, really? In a party led by Donald Trump with the affairs and the porn stars and everything else that is associated with that guy. Security? When we’re talking about a party led by somebody who has been rolled repeatedly by figures like Putin and Xi Jinping. And family? My goodness. This is what I think it really comes down to. A lot of people at home are thinking about their families. I’m thinking about our family and how our family, my husband and the son and daughter that we’re raising, are going to be so much better off if Kamala Harris gets elected, if Democrats win.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Are we on Candid Camera?
I think that Butt guy is just Weird.
Mr Pete lives in some sort of alternate universe.
This clown wants to be Kamala’s VP choice.
That is, if his “ husband “ will allow it.
Stfu buttplug democrats are the party of abortion
Oooh, we are being othered.
Obviously.
Well said.
In a better country, Butt-edge-edge would be imprisoned for sodomy.
Ignore the bobbingheads
The nuclear Democrat family includes one lady and four cats.
Is this the Bee?
Pete can knock it off, he won’t get Kamala’s VP slot unless they plan on losing on purpose.
The fact that our society allows vile scumbags like Pete to be married to a man and have kids only proves that this country has already fallen.
Yeah, one where family values include butchering your own pre-born children.
To some extent this is a strawman being constructed by Mayor Pete. The issue isn’t Trump’s personal family history but Republican policy vs Democrat policy. But the gay mayor does the old switcheroo right in front of your eyes. His initial statement is “The Republican Party long ago sacrificed their claim to be the party of family” then immediately changes the subject to focus on Donald Trump’s personal life. The idea that Republicans support Trump because of his pro-family policies not because of his marital history isn’t even considered.
But even if you accept the gay mayor’s premise that the GOP has sacrificed its claim to being the party of family because its presidential candidate is twice divorced and has had affairs in the past, then why wouldn’t that apply to the Democratic Party as well? I mean if we want to focus on marital infidelities we’re talking about the party of Bill Clinton, aren’t we?
And if the gay mayor really believed that the marital history of a party’s presidential candidate determines whether that party is pro-family or not, and if he were interested in being honest, he would have said something like,
“To the Republican Party’s credit, they are no more pro-family than the Democrat Party. Both have had Presidents with a history of marital infidelity, so we need to focus on areas where we differ from the Republicans not on things we have in common.
While Democrats are sacrificing members of their family.
Didn’t the Dems - including rabid feminists - support the philandering Bill Clinton? Remember, Pete?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.