Rumors saying Weissmann is gay are strongly denied by his supporters, who say that he is married, so that proves it.
Here's a picture of him, and one of his wife. (Not sure what pronouns they use.)
Biden could have avoided all this by simply appointing a current U.S. attorney, as happen Ed with Durham and Hur. But I think they had Garland so it so Trump couldn’t fire him as easily. Which is precisely why it raises a constitutional problem.
Weissmann is clearly a threat to Democracy, and the US Constitution.
The prosecution is welcome to appeal the judge’s ruling. Piss-ants in the left-field bleachers are welcome to shut up.
FU AH
This case is dead, Jim. Fugeddaboutit.
lawfare
Weissman needs to go to prison, he subverted election laws in every state steal the 2020 election
Suck it up Weissmann...you wuss
How many times has he been right?
I don ‘t think Weisman is very bright — corrupt as hell but not bright. My understanding is that the 11th can’t remove Cannon and that she would have to be impeached.
Almost predictable. Anytime the Neo Facist winf of the Democrat party is thwarted their 1st call is to remove the obstruction by force
PURE Fascist wanna be behavior.
When justice is served the stench of a democrat always appears.
Weissmann
https://www.businessinsider.com/the-complete-and-utter-humiliation-of-the-enron-task-force-2009-10
https://nypost.com/2020/09/16/by-destroying-evidence-team-mueller-proved-they-have-a-lot-to-hide/
This guy doesn’t represent justice, he represents personal ambition and a plaque like use of the courts. I am sure his opinion carries a great deal of weight with ‘Trump haters’ but probably not much with the SCOTUS.
Weissman is about 30% of the lawfare strategy aimed at Trump. Norm Eisen is 70%. Both need kind, friendly visits from Patriots ASAP. Enough is enough.
That is not how it works. People used to be hesitate to display their ignorance. How I wish for a return to those simpler times.
While I think that the bulk of the law, the balance of the law is squarely against Judge Cannon, this is something that the 11th Circuit or the Supreme Court can remedy.”
Her decision is firmly within the law.
It obviously isn’t frivolous. Clarence Thomas just wrote an opinion supporting that smith is not duly appointed. So, it’s hardly a frivolous opinion. In essence, she’s saying that smith has no standing to bring anything
Weissmann is such a tool. He states “this is not a decision on the merits itâÂÂs about the procedure that was used”. Isn’t that same argument used by the right in regards to all the fraudulent election cases? Amazing how the left uses both sides of the coin when it suits them.
And....it wasn’t about procedure, it was about the Constitution. He should look into it once in awhile.