Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Trots Biden Out to Screech 'I Dissent' With Supreme Court on Presidential Immunity
Townhall.com ^ | 1 July A.D. 2024 | Reuven Fenton

Posted on 07/01/2024 6:45:56 PM PDT by lightman

On Monday evening, President Joe Biden addressed the nation on Trump v. United States, a 6-3 decision which found that presidents has immunity when acting in what the Court stressed was their official capacity. How did he manage to do so? He spoke for less than four minutes, and left without taking any questions. In case there was any doubt how he felt, the president screeched that he agreed with Justice Sonia Sotomayor's dissent, declaring "I dissent!"

That doesn't mean Biden wasn't prone to some truly hypocritical points in his remarks, which were very clearly prewritten by someone else and which he read directly from as he spoke.

"Today's decision almost certainly means that there are virtually no limits on what a president can do," Biden claimed at the start, lamenting a case which, again, makes clear that the president is only immune when acting in an official capacity. He went on to claim that "the power of the office will no longer be constrained by the law, even and including the Supreme Court of the United States, adding "the only limits will be self imposed by the president alone."

Despite how he only spoke for short a time period, the president still brought up unrelated topics so that he could rant and rave about the Supreme Court. "This decision today has continued the Court's attacks in recent years on a wide range of long established legal principles in our nation, from gutting voting rights and civil rights to taking away a woman's right to choose, to today's decision that undermines the rule the law of this nation." Recommended Did Anyone Catch What This CNN Host Was Doing During the Trump-Biden Debate? Matt Vespa

He also brought up the events of January 6, 2021 to insist "I think it's fair to say is one of the darkest days in the history of America. Now the man who sent that mob to the U.S. Capitol is facing potential criminal conviction," speaking about former and potentially future President Donald Trump.

What Biden left out, though, is how Trump urged those at the Capitol that day to protest peacefully.

The Trump War Room account also posted such reminders while Biden was speaking, as well as reminded how footage was unearthed last month of then Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) taking responsibility for a lack of preparedness on that day.

Biden then went to make the issue about the election between himself and Trump, with the latter continuing to lead in the polls, especially after last Thursday's disastrous debate performance. He spoke specifically about the case brought against Trump by Special Counsel Jack Smith to do with January 6, which faced a major blow with Monday's decision.

"The American people deserve to have an answer in the courts before the upcoming election. The public has a right to know the answer about what happened on January 6 before they are asked to vote again this year. Now, because of today's decision, that is highly, highly unlikely. It's a terrible disservice to the people of this nation," Biden lamented.

"So now, now the American people have to do what the Court should have been willing to do but will not. The American people have to render a judgment about Donald Trump's behavior. The American people must decide whether Donald Trump's assault on our democracy on January 6 makes him unfit for public office, the highest office of the land. The American people must decide if Trump's embrace of violence to preserve his power is acceptable. Perhaps most importantly, the American people must decide if they want to entrust the president, once again, the presidency to Donald Trump, now knowing he'll be more emboldened to do whatever he pleases, whenever he wants to do it."

After bringing President George Washington into this, Biden claimed that after the Trump v. United States decision, "it'll depend on the character of the men and women who hold that presidency that are going to define the limits of the power of the presidency, because the law will no longer do it."

If such points weren't noteworthy enough, Biden, with a serious face, claimed "I know I will respect the limits of the presidential powers that I have for three and a half years," despite how he frequently brags about defying the Supreme Court when it comes to student loan debt.

"But any president, including Donald Trump, will now be free to ignore the law," leaving out the key detail about presidents acting in their official capacity. "I concur with Justice Sotomayor's dissent today," he went on to say, mispronouncing her name so that he was saying "Sotomayer."

As we covered earlier, Sotomayor's dissent was particularly hysterical, and Biden read from one of many outlandish points that she made. "Here's what she said," Biden said, slurring his words as he went on to quote the justice. "She said 'In every use of official power, the President is now a king above the law... With fear for our democracy, I dissent.' End of quote."

"So should the American people dissent! I dissent. May God bless you all and may God help preserve democracy. Thank you. And may God protect our troops," Biden said before walking off. Reporters shouting questions, such as whether Biden will drop out out the race, went ignored.

As Axios' Alex Thompson pointed out, this was the first time since February that Biden addressed the nation publicly for cameras. The president was particularly angry in that instance as he addressed Special Counsel Robert Hur's report released just earlier that day.

Hur decided not to charge the president, characterized an old man with a poor memory. Not helping that view was that while taking questions for that press conference, Biden managed to mix up the foreign leaders of Mexico and Egypt.

Had he spoken any longer or been permitted by his handlers to take any questions, Biden might have short-circuited, considering we're outside the peak hours of when he's "dependently engaged," from 10am-4pm.

Biden was made to come out even after the campaign released a statement.


TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: biden; boden; dissent; fjb; immunity; impairedbiden; j6; jan6; january6; kamala; kamlaharris; lawfare; scotus; speech; supremecourt; teleprompter; teleprompterjoe; trump; whitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last
Best of the embedded X/Tweets:


1 posted on 07/01/2024 6:45:56 PM PDT by lightman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Josef Stolen should be grateful


2 posted on 07/01/2024 6:47:19 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

And once again Napoleon grunts about about the “evils” of Snowball...


3 posted on 07/01/2024 6:47:34 PM PDT by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Surprised Biden’s people haven’t yet nullified the Supreme Court ruling with an Executive Order. After all, why the hell not, who’s going to stop them?


4 posted on 07/01/2024 6:47:57 PM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

They drugged up the senile geezer and managed to get him to say a few words without croaking.

“Our democracy”?

Nope.

Late empire is more like it.


5 posted on 07/01/2024 6:49:40 PM PDT by cgbg ("Our democracy" = Their Kleptocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Why didn’t he thank them for ensuring Obama isn’t charged for murder?


6 posted on 07/01/2024 6:52:27 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

I can’t believe the blind hatred Biden admin has for trump. They are blind to the issue that if a president can be held liable for acts while in office, both he and Obama could be charged with quite a few charges themselves.


7 posted on 07/01/2024 6:53:59 PM PDT by midwest_hiker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lightman

The MSM never describes it as “Biden attacks Supreme Court.”


8 posted on 07/01/2024 6:54:55 PM PDT by alternatives?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: midwest_hiker

It is classic projection—everything they say is actually about them.


9 posted on 07/01/2024 6:55:43 PM PDT by cgbg ("Our democracy" = Their Kleptocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: montag813

So what about the stuff he did as vice president?


10 posted on 07/01/2024 6:56:40 PM PDT by jcon40 (Leftists are usually obnoxious Bullies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lightman
.... Democrats insist on burning down an entire forest to destroy the one red haired tree that they hate ....

.

11 posted on 07/01/2024 6:57:34 PM PDT by R_Kangel ("A nation of sheep will beget a nation ruled by wolves")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Kinda funny, and very ironic, how the liberals are going nuts over the Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity. They refer to a biased MAGA court who is out to make a president king and “above the law” like Hillary, Obama and Biden are. Yet, these fine stewards of Democracy are the same ones who want to expand and stack the Supreme Court with liberals so they always get liberal rulings. Yep, you can’t make this stuff up.


12 posted on 07/01/2024 7:00:25 PM PDT by From The Deer Stand (Mp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

Sleepy Joe best reconsider what he rails against. A ruling in the opposite direction could very well put his ass in a sling at some point in the future.


13 posted on 07/01/2024 7:00:32 PM PDT by technically right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lightman
White House Trots Biden Out to Screech 'I Dissent' With Supreme Court on Presidential Immunity

Gosh, Joe. Think about what you're saying. Shouldn't you be careful what you wish for?

In the next year or two, if you're still above ground, I'm guessing you could be needing every bit of immunity you can muster.

14 posted on 07/01/2024 7:04:47 PM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamuraiScot

Especially since he can’t legally pardon himself and his crime family in advance.

But when has the law ever stopped him?


15 posted on 07/01/2024 7:13:33 PM PDT by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Biden didn’t need a SCOTUS decision to take the law into his own hands. Today’s ruling doesn’t enable lawlessness, it protects a former President from the lawless actions of a sitting President.


16 posted on 07/01/2024 7:26:35 PM PDT by mbrfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
Oh, look!
He spoke after 4:00pm so that should quiet all those nasty reports of him being a 10:00am-4:00pm president.

I'm so glad that is settled. /s
17 posted on 07/01/2024 7:34:43 PM PDT by EliRoom8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lightman

So, uhm, we’re going to be flooded with articles from the likes of NPR, WaPo, et al, declaring these Biden attacks on the top court as undermining the rule of law, right? Will Biden be gagged? Isn’t he endangering the lives of these members of the court? Isn’t this sorta insurrection-y speech? Will he be impeached for this treacherous act against OUR DEMOCRACY? My, oh my. I’m not holding my breath.


18 posted on 07/01/2024 7:40:28 PM PDT by John Robinson (🍺)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

Biden can waive his presidential immunity when his turn comes to be tried for treason.


19 posted on 07/01/2024 7:41:33 PM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Robinson

You know the answer: Rules for thee but not for me.

If we didn’t have double standards we’d have no standards at all.


20 posted on 07/01/2024 7:42:24 PM PDT by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson